WSGR logoWSGR logo
WSGR logo
  • Experience
  • People
  • Insights
  • About Us
  • Careers

  • Practice Areas
  • Industries

  • Corporate
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Patents and Innovations
  • Regulatory
  • Technology Transactions

  • Capital Markets
  • Corporate Governance
  • Corporate Life Sciences
  • Derivatives
  • Emerging Companies and Venture Capital
  • Employee Benefits and Compensation
  • Energy and Climate Solutions
  • Executive Advisory Program
  • Finance and Structured Finance
  • Fund Formation
  • Greater China
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Private Equity
  • Public Company Representation
  • Real Estate
  • Restructuring
  • Shareholder Engagement and Activism
  • Tax
  • U.S. Expansion
  • Wealthtech

  • Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs)

  • Environmental, Social, and Governance

  • AI and Data Center Infrastructure
  • Energy Regulation and Competition
  • Project Development and M&A
  • Project Finance and Tax Credit Transactions
  • Sustainability and Decarbonization
  • Transportation Electrification

  • U.S. Expansion Library and Resources

  • Post-Grant Review
  • Trademark and Advertising

  • Antitrust Litigation
  • Arbitration
  • Board and Internal Investigations
  • Class Action Litigation
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Consumer Litigation
  • Corporate Governance Litigation
  • Employment Litigation
  • Executive Branch Updates
  • Government Investigations
  • Internet Strategy and Litigation
  • Patent Litigation
  • Securities Litigation
  • State Attorneys General
  • Supreme Court and Appellate Practice
  • Trade Secret Litigation
  • Trademark and Copyright Litigation
  • Trial
  • White Collar Crime

  • Advertising, Promotions, and Marketing
  • Antitrust and Competition
  • Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. (CFIUS)
  • Communications
  • Data, Privacy, and Cybersecurity
  • Export Control and Sanctions
  • FCPA and Anti-Corruption
  • FDA Regulatory, Healthcare, and Consumer Products
  • Federal Trade Commission
  • Fintech and Financial Services
  • Government Contracts
  • National Security and Trade
  • Payments
  • State Attorneys General
  • Strategic Risk and Crisis Management
  • Tariffs, Customs, and Import Compliance

  • Antitrust and Intellectual Property
  • Antitrust Civil Enforcement
  • Antitrust Compliance and Business Strategy
  • Antitrust Criminal Enforcement
  • Antitrust Litigation
  • Antitrust Merger Clearance
  • European Competition Law
  • Third-Party Merger and Non-Merger Antitrust Representation

  • Anti-Money Laundering
  • Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence (FOCI)
  • Team Telecom

  • AI in Healthcare
  • Animal Health
  • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
  • Aviation
  • Biotech
  • Blockchain and Cryptocurrency
  • Clean Energy
  • Climate and Clean Technologies
  • Communications and Networking
  • Consumer Products and Services
  • Data Storage and Cloud
  • Defense Tech
  • Diagnostics, Life Science Tools, and Deep Tech
  • Digital Health
  • Digital Media and Entertainment
  • Electronic Gaming
  • Fintech and Financial Services
  • FoodTech and AgTech
  • Global Generics
  • Internet
  • Life Sciences
  • Medical Devices
  • Mobile Devices
  • Mobility
  • NewSpace
  • Quantum Computing
  • Semiconductors
  • Software

  • Offices
  • Country Desks
  • Events
  • Community
  • Our Diversity
  • Sustainability
  • Our Values
  • Board of Directors
  • Management Team

  • Austin
  • Boston
  • Boulder
  • Brussels
  • Century City
  • Hong Kong
  • London
  • Los Angeles
  • New York
  • Palo Alto
  • Salt Lake City
  • San Diego
  • San Francisco
  • Seattle
  • Shanghai
  • Washington, D.C.
  • Wilmington, DE

  • Law Students
  • Judicial Clerks
  • Experienced Attorneys
  • Patent Agents
  • Business Professionals
  • Alternative Legal Careers
  • Contact Recruiting
Celine Liu
Senior Counsel
Litigation
Washington, D.C.
celine.liu@wsgr.com

D202-791-8026

Download vCard
Open PDF

Celine Liu is senior counsel in the Washington, D.C., office of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, where she focuses on intellectual property litigation and counseling. Celine has litigated more than 30 cases before federal district courts, state courts, and the U.S. International Trade Commission concerning patent, trade secret, and licensing disputes. She has represented clients in litigation involving semiconductor technologies, mobile communications devices, wireless network communications products, LED lighting products, consumer electronics, computer cooling products, pharmaceuticals, and rare-earth products.

Celine has been involved in patent cases in court and administrative proceedings that occur outside of the U.S. She has also arbitrated cases overseas involving contract and commercial disputes.

Celine frequently speaks on matters related to U.S. patent law and litigation at conferences and panels. She is fluent in Mandarin.

Experience

Celine Liu is senior counsel in the Washington, D.C., office of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, where she focuses on intellectual property litigation and counseling. Celine has litigated more than 30 cases before federal district courts, state courts, and the U.S. International Trade Commission concerning patent, trade secret, and licensing disputes. She has represented clients in litigation involving semiconductor technologies, mobile communications devices, wireless network communications products, LED lighting products, consumer electronics, computer cooling products, pharmaceuticals, and rare-earth products.

Celine has been involved in patent cases in court and administrative proceedings that occur outside of the U.S. She has also arbitrated cases overseas involving contract and commercial disputes.

Celine frequently speaks on matters related to U.S. patent law and litigation at conferences and panels. She is fluent in Mandarin.

Education
  • J.D., University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law
  • M.A., Economics, Duke University
  • B.S., Industrial Engineering and Management, National Chiao Tung University
Admissions
  • Bar of the District of Columbia
  • State Bar of California
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
  • U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
  • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
  • U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas
Credentials
Education
  • J.D., University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law
  • M.A., Economics, Duke University
  • B.S., Industrial Engineering and Management, National Chiao Tung University
Admissions
  • Bar of the District of Columbia
  • State Bar of California
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
  • U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
  • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
  • U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas

Select District Court Matters

  • ReactX LLC v. Google LLC, No. 18STCV09674 (Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles); representing defendant Google.
  • Wirtgen America, Inc. v. Caterpillar Inc., No. 1:17-cv-00770 (D. Del.); representing defendant Caterpillar.
  • SZ DJI Technology Co. Ltd. v. Textron Specialized Vehicles, Inc. et al., No. 1:23-cv-00055 (D. Del.) and SZ DJI Technology Co. Ltd. v. Bell Textron Inc. et al., No. 4:23-cv-01025 (N.D. Tex.); representing plaintiff DJI.
  • Gatekeeper Systems, Inc. v. Rocateq USA, LLC et al., No. 8:22-cv-02092 (C.D. Cal.); representing defendants Rocateq.
  • VB Assets, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al., No. 1:19-cv-01410 (D. Del.); representing plaintiff VB Assets.
  • Epistar Corporation v. Lowe’s Home Centers, LLC et al., No. 2:17-cv-03219 (C.D. Cal.); Epistar Corporation v. Lowe’s Home Centers, LLC et al., No. 2:23-cv-07283 (C.D. Cal.); and Epistar Corporation v. Lowe’s Home Centers, LLC et al., No. 6:20-cv-00420 (W.D. Tex.); representing plaintiff Epistar.
  • Cyntec Company, Ltd. v. Chilisin Electronics Corp. et al., No. 5:18-00939 (N.D. Cal.); representing plaintiff Cyntec.
  • Nichia Corporation v. Feit Electric Company, Inc. et al., No. 2:18-cv-01390 (C.D. Cal.). Representing intervenor Unity Microelectronics, Inc.
  • Unity Opto Technology Co. Ltd. v. Lowe's Home Centers LLC, et al., No. 3:18-cv-00027 (W.D.N.C.). Representing plaintiff Unity Opto Technology Co. Ltd.
  • TQ Delta LLC v. ZyXEL Communications Inc., et al., No. 13-cv-02013 (D. Del.). Representing defendants ZyXEL Communications Inc. and ZyXEL Communications Corp.
  • Feit Electric Company Inc. v. Cree Inc., No. 1:15-cv-00535 (M.D.N.C.). Representing intervenor Unity Opto Technology Co. Ltd.
  • Richtek Technology Corp. v. uPI Semiconductor Corp. et al., No. 3:09-cv-05659 (N.D. Cal.). Representing plaintiff Richtek Technology Corporation (parallel state court case: Richtek Technology Corporation, et al. v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation, et al., No. 1-11-cv-192991 (Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara). Representing plaintiffs Richtek Technology Corporation and Richtek USA Inc.
  • CpuMate Inc., et al. v. Cooler Master Co. Ltd. and Cooler Master USA Inc., No. 2:13-cv-00351 (E.D. Tex.). Representing defendants Cooler Master Co. Ltd. and Cooler Master USA Inc.
  • Asetek Holdings Inc., et al. v. Cooler Master Co. Ltd. and Cooler Master USA Inc., No. 13-cv-0457 (N.D. Cal.). Representing defendants Cooler Master Co. Ltd. and Cooler Master USA Inc.
  • Rovi Corporation, et al. v. Haier Group Corp. and Haier America Trading LLC, No. 11-cv-01140 (D. Del.). Representing defendants Haier Group Corp. and Haier America Trading LLC.
  • MOSAID Technologies Inc. v. Realtek Semiconductor Corp., et al., No. 2:11-cv-00179 (E.D. Tex.). Representing defendant Realtek Semiconductor Corp.
  • Best Medical International Inc. v. Accuray Incorporated, et al., No. 2:10-cv-01043 (W.D. Pa.). Representing defendant Accuray Incorporated.
  • Positive Technologies Inc. v. Barnes & Noble Inc., et al., No. 2:10-cv-00263 (N.D. Cal.). Representing defendant Barnes & Noble Inc.
  • Elan Microelectronics Corporation v. Pixcir Microelectronics Co. Ltd., No. 2:10-cv-00014 (D. Nev.). Representing plaintiff Elan Microelectronics Corporation.
  • Elan Microelectronics Corporation v. Apple Inc., No. 5:09-cv-01531 (N.D. Cal.). Representing plaintiff Elan Microelectronics Corporation.


Select ITC 337 Matters

  • Certain Electronic Anti-Theft Shopping Cart Wheels, Components Thereof and Systems Containing the Same, No. 337-TA-1357; representing respondents Rocateq.
  • Certain Hybrid Electric Vehicles and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-1042. Representing respondent Ford Motor Company.
  • Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Products, Inv. No. 337-TA-1002. Representing Jiangsu Shagang Group and Jiangsu Shagang International Trade Co. Ltd.
  • Certain Light-Emitting Diode Products and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-947. Representing respondents Unity Opto Technology Co. Ltd., Unity Microelectronics Inc.
  • Certain Light Reflectors and Components, Packaging, and Related Advertising Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-924. Representing respondents Sinowell (Shanghai) Co. Ltd., Sinohydro Ltd., Groco Enterprises LLC, inSun LLC, Aqua Serene Inc., and Aurora Innovations Inc.
  • Certain Point-To-Point Network Communication Devices and Products Containing Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-892. Representing respondents AmTRAN Technology Co. Ltd. and AmTRAN Logistics Inc.
  • Certain Consumer Electronics with Display and Processing Capabilities, Inv. No. 337-TA-884. Representing respondents AmTRAN Technology Co. Ltd. and AmTRAN Logistics Inc.
  • Certain Sintered Rare Earth Magnets, Methods of Making Same, and Products Containing Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-855. Representing respondents Yantai Zhenghai Magnetic Material Co. Ltd., Ningbo Jinji Strong Magnetic Material Co. Ltd., and Anhui Earth-Panda Advance Magnetic Material Co. Ltd.
  • Certain Products Containing Interactive Program Guide and Parental Controls Technology, Inv. No. 337-TA-820. Representing respondents Haier Group Corp. and Haier America Trading LLC.
  • Certain Electronic Devices with Multi-Touch Enabled Touchpads and Touchscreens, Inv. No. 337-TA-714. Representing complainant Elan Microelectronics Corporation.
  • Certain DC-DC Controllers and Products Containing the Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-698 (Enforcement Proceeding). Representing complainants Richtek Technology Corporation and Richtek USA Inc.
Matters

Select District Court Matters

  • ReactX LLC v. Google LLC, No. 18STCV09674 (Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles); representing defendant Google.
  • Wirtgen America, Inc. v. Caterpillar Inc., No. 1:17-cv-00770 (D. Del.); representing defendant Caterpillar.
  • SZ DJI Technology Co. Ltd. v. Textron Specialized Vehicles, Inc. et al., No. 1:23-cv-00055 (D. Del.) and SZ DJI Technology Co. Ltd. v. Bell Textron Inc. et al., No. 4:23-cv-01025 (N.D. Tex.); representing plaintiff DJI.
  • Gatekeeper Systems, Inc. v. Rocateq USA, LLC et al., No. 8:22-cv-02092 (C.D. Cal.); representing defendants Rocateq.
  • VB Assets, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al., No. 1:19-cv-01410 (D. Del.); representing plaintiff VB Assets.
  • Epistar Corporation v. Lowe’s Home Centers, LLC et al., No. 2:17-cv-03219 (C.D. Cal.); Epistar Corporation v. Lowe’s Home Centers, LLC et al., No. 2:23-cv-07283 (C.D. Cal.); and Epistar Corporation v. Lowe’s Home Centers, LLC et al., No. 6:20-cv-00420 (W.D. Tex.); representing plaintiff Epistar.
  • Cyntec Company, Ltd. v. Chilisin Electronics Corp. et al., No. 5:18-00939 (N.D. Cal.); representing plaintiff Cyntec.
  • Nichia Corporation v. Feit Electric Company, Inc. et al., No. 2:18-cv-01390 (C.D. Cal.). Representing intervenor Unity Microelectronics, Inc.
  • Unity Opto Technology Co. Ltd. v. Lowe's Home Centers LLC, et al., No. 3:18-cv-00027 (W.D.N.C.). Representing plaintiff Unity Opto Technology Co. Ltd.
  • TQ Delta LLC v. ZyXEL Communications Inc., et al., No. 13-cv-02013 (D. Del.). Representing defendants ZyXEL Communications Inc. and ZyXEL Communications Corp.
  • Feit Electric Company Inc. v. Cree Inc., No. 1:15-cv-00535 (M.D.N.C.). Representing intervenor Unity Opto Technology Co. Ltd.
  • Richtek Technology Corp. v. uPI Semiconductor Corp. et al., No. 3:09-cv-05659 (N.D. Cal.). Representing plaintiff Richtek Technology Corporation (parallel state court case: Richtek Technology Corporation, et al. v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation, et al., No. 1-11-cv-192991 (Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara). Representing plaintiffs Richtek Technology Corporation and Richtek USA Inc.
  • CpuMate Inc., et al. v. Cooler Master Co. Ltd. and Cooler Master USA Inc., No. 2:13-cv-00351 (E.D. Tex.). Representing defendants Cooler Master Co. Ltd. and Cooler Master USA Inc.
  • Asetek Holdings Inc., et al. v. Cooler Master Co. Ltd. and Cooler Master USA Inc., No. 13-cv-0457 (N.D. Cal.). Representing defendants Cooler Master Co. Ltd. and Cooler Master USA Inc.
  • Rovi Corporation, et al. v. Haier Group Corp. and Haier America Trading LLC, No. 11-cv-01140 (D. Del.). Representing defendants Haier Group Corp. and Haier America Trading LLC.
  • MOSAID Technologies Inc. v. Realtek Semiconductor Corp., et al., No. 2:11-cv-00179 (E.D. Tex.). Representing defendant Realtek Semiconductor Corp.
  • Best Medical International Inc. v. Accuray Incorporated, et al., No. 2:10-cv-01043 (W.D. Pa.). Representing defendant Accuray Incorporated.
  • Positive Technologies Inc. v. Barnes & Noble Inc., et al., No. 2:10-cv-00263 (N.D. Cal.). Representing defendant Barnes & Noble Inc.
  • Elan Microelectronics Corporation v. Pixcir Microelectronics Co. Ltd., No. 2:10-cv-00014 (D. Nev.). Representing plaintiff Elan Microelectronics Corporation.
  • Elan Microelectronics Corporation v. Apple Inc., No. 5:09-cv-01531 (N.D. Cal.). Representing plaintiff Elan Microelectronics Corporation.


Select ITC 337 Matters

  • Certain Electronic Anti-Theft Shopping Cart Wheels, Components Thereof and Systems Containing the Same, No. 337-TA-1357; representing respondents Rocateq.
  • Certain Hybrid Electric Vehicles and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-1042. Representing respondent Ford Motor Company.
  • Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Products, Inv. No. 337-TA-1002. Representing Jiangsu Shagang Group and Jiangsu Shagang International Trade Co. Ltd.
  • Certain Light-Emitting Diode Products and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-947. Representing respondents Unity Opto Technology Co. Ltd., Unity Microelectronics Inc.
  • Certain Light Reflectors and Components, Packaging, and Related Advertising Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-924. Representing respondents Sinowell (Shanghai) Co. Ltd., Sinohydro Ltd., Groco Enterprises LLC, inSun LLC, Aqua Serene Inc., and Aurora Innovations Inc.
  • Certain Point-To-Point Network Communication Devices and Products Containing Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-892. Representing respondents AmTRAN Technology Co. Ltd. and AmTRAN Logistics Inc.
  • Certain Consumer Electronics with Display and Processing Capabilities, Inv. No. 337-TA-884. Representing respondents AmTRAN Technology Co. Ltd. and AmTRAN Logistics Inc.
  • Certain Sintered Rare Earth Magnets, Methods of Making Same, and Products Containing Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-855. Representing respondents Yantai Zhenghai Magnetic Material Co. Ltd., Ningbo Jinji Strong Magnetic Material Co. Ltd., and Anhui Earth-Panda Advance Magnetic Material Co. Ltd.
  • Certain Products Containing Interactive Program Guide and Parental Controls Technology, Inv. No. 337-TA-820. Representing respondents Haier Group Corp. and Haier America Trading LLC.
  • Certain Electronic Devices with Multi-Touch Enabled Touchpads and Touchscreens, Inv. No. 337-TA-714. Representing complainant Elan Microelectronics Corporation.
  • Certain DC-DC Controllers and Products Containing the Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-698 (Enforcement Proceeding). Representing complainants Richtek Technology Corporation and Richtek USA Inc.
Focus Areas
  • Litigation
  • Patent Litigation
  • Trade Secret Litigation
Recent Insights
Client Highlights
Firm Obtains Complete Jury Victory for Cyntec in Patent Validity Trial
On March 5, 2026, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati secured a complete jury victory in a patent invalidity trial in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on behalf of firm client Cyntec Company, Ltd. Rejecting defendant Chilisin’s arguments on obviousness, the jury found that all asserted claims of Cyntec’s U.S. Patent Nos. 8,922,312 and 9,481,037 were valid. Wilson Sonsini also represented Cyntec in a previous jury trial which had found that Chilisin willfully infringed both patents and imposed a 5 percent royalty. 
Learn More
Client Highlights
Wilson Sonsini Secures Jury Trial Victory for Google in Case Alleging Misuse of Advertising Technology
On June 10, 2025, Wilson Sonsini secured a complete defense verdict from a Los Angeles jury in ReactX LLC v. Google LLC.  ReactX sought $1.3 billion in damages, alleging that Google breached a series of contracts by misusing ReactX’s confidential technology to build two of Google’s most successful digital advertising products. ReactX originally brought the case as one for trade secret misappropriation, but just two weeks before trial, it voluntarily dismissed its trade secret cause of action. The court further trimmed ReactX’s lawsuit in response to nonsuit motions brought by Wilson Sonsini, ruling that Google was bound by only one of the contracts asserted by ReactX and dismissing ReactX’s cause of action for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. After a six-week trial featuring 17 witnesses, the jury completely vindicated Google on ReactX’s remaining cause of action for breach of contract.

The Wilson Sonsini team representing Google in the matter was led by partners Colleen Bal, John Flynn, Tait Graves, Josh Baskin, and Lucy Yen, and included Andrew Alderette, Stephanie Cheng, Kayla Dessel, Katherine Ericson, Celine Liu, Sachli Nayeri, Courtney Reed, Matt Donohue, Doug Brockmeier, Sissel Browder, Shannon Hill, and Pamela Sandillo.
Learn More
View All
  • people
  • insights
  • about us
  • careers
  • Binder
  • Alumni
  • Mailing List Signup
  • Client FTP Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Accessibility
WSGR logo
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Instagram
Youtube
Copyright © 2026 Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati. All Rights Reserved.