WSGR logoWSGR logo
WSGR logo
  • Experience
  • People
  • Insights
  • About Us
  • Careers

  • Practice Areas
  • Industries

  • Corporate
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Patents and Innovations
  • Regulatory
  • Technology Transactions

  • Broker-Dealer
  • Capital Markets
  • Corporate Governance
  • Corporate Life Sciences
  • Derivatives
  • Emerging Companies
  • Employee Benefits and Compensation
  • Energy and Climate Solutions
  • Executive Advisory Program
  • Finance and Structured Finance
  • Fund Formation
  • Greater China
  • Investment Adviser
  • Israel
  • Latin America
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Private Equity
  • Public Company Representation
  • Real Estate
  • Restructuring
  • Shareholder Engagement and Activism
  • Tax
  • U.S. Expansion

  • Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs)

  • Environmental, Social, and Governance

  • Decarbonization Strategies
  • Energy Regulation and Competition
  • Project Development and Transactions
  • Project Finance and Tax Equity
  • Sustainability and Decarbonization
  • Transportation Electrification

  • U.S. Expansion Library and Resources

  • Post-Grant Review
  • Trademark and Advertising

  • Arbitration
  • Board and Internal Investigations
  • Class Action Litigation
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Consumer Litigation
  • Corporate Governance Litigation
  • Employment Litigation
  • Government Investigations
  • Internet Strategy and Litigation
  • Patent Litigation
  • Securities Litigation
  • Supreme Court and Appellate Practice
  • Trade Secret Litigation
  • Trademark and Copyright Litigation
  • Trial
  • White Collar Crime

  • Advertising, Promotions, and Marketing
  • Antitrust and Competition
  • Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. (CFIUS)
  • Export Control and Sanctions
  • FCPA and Anti-Corruption
  • FDA Regulatory, Healthcare, and Consumer Products
  • Federal Trade Commission
  • Fintech and Financial Services
  • National Security
  • Payments
  • Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • Strategic Risk and Crisis Management

  • Antitrust and Intellectual Property
  • Antitrust Civil Enforcement
  • Antitrust Compliance and Business Strategy
  • Antitrust Criminal Enforcement
  • Antitrust Merger Clearance
  • Antitrust Litigation
  • European Competition Law
  • Third-Party Merger and Non-Merger Antitrust Representation

  • Anti-Money Laundering
  • Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence (FOCI)
  • Team Telecom

  • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
  • Aviation
  • Biotech
  • Blockchain and Cryptocurrency
  • Clean Energy
  • Climate and Clean Technologies
  • Communications and Networking
  • Consumer Products and Services
  • Data Storage and Cloud
  • Digital Health
  • Digital Media and Entertainment
  • Electronic Gaming
  • FoodTech and AgTech
  • Fintech and Financial Services
  • Global Generics
  • Internet
  • Life Sciences
  • Medical Devices
  • Mobile Devices
  • Mobility
  • NewSpace
  • Semiconductors
  • Software

  • Offices
  • Events
  • Pro Bono
  • Community
  • Our Diversity
  • Our Values
  • Board of Directors
  • Management Team

  • Austin
  • Beijing
  • Boston
  • Boulder
  • Brussels
  • Century City
  • Hong Kong
  • London
  • Los Angeles
  • New York
  • Palo Alto
  • Salt Lake City
  • San Diego
  • San Francisco
  • Seattle
  • Shanghai
  • SOMA
  • Washington, D.C.
  • Wilmington, DE

  • Law Students + Recent Graduates
  • Experienced Attorneys
  • Patent Agents
  • Professional Staff
  • Alternative Legal Careers
  • Contact Recruiting

Antitrust Criminal Enforcement

Open PDF
  • Practitioners Skilled in Cartel-Related Matters

    Wilson Sonsini's antitrust team has been involved in some of the largest cartel investigations.

Competition authorities around the globe aggressively investigate and prosecute collusion among competing companies. The U.S. Department of Justice, in particular, prosecutes such conduct criminally.  Indeed, the DOJ has imposed substantial fines and prison sentences against alleged  conspirators, including those located abroad.  

The DOJ's enforcement efforts are often coordinated with other competition authorities, as many investigations are global in scope. The DOJ has also recently initiated the Procurement Collusion Strike Force, which has been active in trying to identify and prosecute criminal antitrust conduct in the government procurement sector.  

With these increased enforcement efforts, companies and their employees need experienced, motivated, and pragmatic criminal antitrust counsel—counsel who can steer them clear of potential criminal sanctions and help them avoid the burdens and potential consequences of a criminal antitrust investigation. 

Our antitrust team has successfully counseled clients on criminal antitrust issues and represented numerous companies and individuals in investigations and grand jury proceedings across a range of industries. Our team has extensive experience dealing with international investigations and has routinely represented foreign companies and executives before the DOJ as well as other competition authorities.  

Our antitrust team members have served as U.S. Attorneys and Department of Justice Antitrust Division prosecutors and senior managers, and have participated on the Antitrust Modernization Commission, which was responsible for overseeing and recommending changes to the criminal antitrust laws and procedures. 

Notably, our attorneys have played key roles in some of the most prominent criminal antitrust investigations in recent years, namely the multi-jurisdictional investigations in the financial services, ocean and air transportation, auto parts, and electronics (e.g., DRAM, capacitors) industries.  

Currently, we are representing a number of companies and individuals in connection with several different ongoing DOJ criminal investigations and counseling clients so that they may avoid potential criminal exposure. Our team handling these matters comprises a deep bench of former antitrust prosecutors and defense counsel. Combined, this team has over 100 years of experience prosecuting or defending criminal antitrust matters.

The antitrust cartel team is led by a former antitrust prosecutor, Mark Rosman, who has 20 years of experience leading some of the largest cartel investigations (marine hose, air transportation) as a lead counsel, trial attorney and prosecutor in the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Justice Department, including as Assistant Chief of the National Criminal Enforcement Section at the DOJ. Global Competition Review referred to Mark as “the real deal,” while Chambers USA described him as a “’top-tier-criminal cartel and investigations specialist” and noted that he is “widely regarded as one of the leading criminal litigators in the antitrust space." He is described by sources as "a very experienced trial attorney.” 

This team at Wilson Sonsini is also fortunate to have Brent Snyder, Wendy Waszmer, Karen Sharp, and Jeff VanHooreweghe, all of whom had significant roles at the U.S. Department of Justice. Before joining Wilson Sonsini, Brent served as Deputy Assistant Attorney General for Criminal Enforcement at the DOJ’s Antitrust Division. He also has more than 10 years' experience investigating and prosecuting criminal antitrust cases as a trial attorney for the Antitrust Division. Most recently, Brent served as CEO of the Hong Kong Competition Commission, Hong Kong’s competition enforcement agency. Additionally, the team added Beau Buffier, former Antitrust Bureau Chief of the New York State Office of the Attorney General, who is experienced in coordinating global antitrust investigations before the UK Competition Authority and the European Commission.

Of course, the best offense is a good defense, and we partner with our clients to ensure that they take steps to avoid the prospect of a damaging criminal investigation. The Antitrust Division recently announced a new policy to incentivize corporate antitrust compliance programs. Going forward, the DOJ will formally consider corporate compliance programs at both the charging and sentencing stages in criminal antitrust prosecutions. We work with our clients to set up compliance programs tailored to their business needs and objectives that will benefit the company under the DOJ’s new policy.  

Overview

Competition authorities around the globe aggressively investigate and prosecute collusion among competing companies. The U.S. Department of Justice, in particular, prosecutes such conduct criminally.  Indeed, the DOJ has imposed substantial fines and prison sentences against alleged  conspirators, including those located abroad.  

The DOJ's enforcement efforts are often coordinated with other competition authorities, as many investigations are global in scope. The DOJ has also recently initiated the Procurement Collusion Strike Force, which has been active in trying to identify and prosecute criminal antitrust conduct in the government procurement sector.  

With these increased enforcement efforts, companies and their employees need experienced, motivated, and pragmatic criminal antitrust counsel—counsel who can steer them clear of potential criminal sanctions and help them avoid the burdens and potential consequences of a criminal antitrust investigation. 

Our antitrust team has successfully counseled clients on criminal antitrust issues and represented numerous companies and individuals in investigations and grand jury proceedings across a range of industries. Our team has extensive experience dealing with international investigations and has routinely represented foreign companies and executives before the DOJ as well as other competition authorities.  

Our antitrust team members have served as U.S. Attorneys and Department of Justice Antitrust Division prosecutors and senior managers, and have participated on the Antitrust Modernization Commission, which was responsible for overseeing and recommending changes to the criminal antitrust laws and procedures. 

Notably, our attorneys have played key roles in some of the most prominent criminal antitrust investigations in recent years, namely the multi-jurisdictional investigations in the financial services, ocean and air transportation, auto parts, and electronics (e.g., DRAM, capacitors) industries.  

Currently, we are representing a number of companies and individuals in connection with several different ongoing DOJ criminal investigations and counseling clients so that they may avoid potential criminal exposure. Our team handling these matters comprises a deep bench of former antitrust prosecutors and defense counsel. Combined, this team has over 100 years of experience prosecuting or defending criminal antitrust matters.

The antitrust cartel team is led by a former antitrust prosecutor, Mark Rosman, who has 20 years of experience leading some of the largest cartel investigations (marine hose, air transportation) as a lead counsel, trial attorney and prosecutor in the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Justice Department, including as Assistant Chief of the National Criminal Enforcement Section at the DOJ. Global Competition Review referred to Mark as “the real deal,” while Chambers USA described him as a “’top-tier-criminal cartel and investigations specialist” and noted that he is “widely regarded as one of the leading criminal litigators in the antitrust space." He is described by sources as "a very experienced trial attorney.” 

This team at Wilson Sonsini is also fortunate to have Brent Snyder, Wendy Waszmer, Karen Sharp, and Jeff VanHooreweghe, all of whom had significant roles at the U.S. Department of Justice. Before joining Wilson Sonsini, Brent served as Deputy Assistant Attorney General for Criminal Enforcement at the DOJ’s Antitrust Division. He also has more than 10 years' experience investigating and prosecuting criminal antitrust cases as a trial attorney for the Antitrust Division. Most recently, Brent served as CEO of the Hong Kong Competition Commission, Hong Kong’s competition enforcement agency. Additionally, the team added Beau Buffier, former Antitrust Bureau Chief of the New York State Office of the Attorney General, who is experienced in coordinating global antitrust investigations before the UK Competition Authority and the European Commission.

Of course, the best offense is a good defense, and we partner with our clients to ensure that they take steps to avoid the prospect of a damaging criminal investigation. The Antitrust Division recently announced a new policy to incentivize corporate antitrust compliance programs. Going forward, the DOJ will formally consider corporate compliance programs at both the charging and sentencing stages in criminal antitrust prosecutions. We work with our clients to set up compliance programs tailored to their business needs and objectives that will benefit the company under the DOJ’s new policy.  

Alerts
Court Dismisses DOJ’s Latest “No-Poach” Case Before Jury Deliberations
In another blow to the U.S. Department of Justice’s (DOJ’s) efforts to criminalize “no-poach” and “wage-fixing” agreements, a federal judge terminated the DOJ’s latest “no-poach” case mid-trial before jury deliberations.
Newsletters
2022 Antitrust Year in Review
We are proud to share the 2022 Antitrust Year in Review, which discusses significant developments in antitrust law, policy, and enforcement over the past year. First, the report spotlights recent outcomes in court for U.S. agency enforcement litigation and discusses major changes in the law that create substantial new antitrust obligations, as well as updated policy and enforcement guidelines. Then, the merger enforcement section describes significant merger control activity by enforcers in the U.S., EU, and UK, and the civil conduct enforcement section outlines enforcer activity in investigating and challenging non-merger conduct. Finally, the report provides an update on global cartel enforcement policy and activity, and concludes with a survey of significant private antitrust litigation in the United States and UK.
Alerts
FTC Reinterprets FTC Act to Include Broad Powers Related to “Interlocking Directorates”
In what might be a further expansion of antitrust enforcement of interlocking directorates, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued a policy statement announcing that it now interprets Section 5 of the FTC Act to grant it authority to take enforcement action against interlocking directorates or officers of competing firms that do not fall within the “literal language of the Clayton Act.”1
Alerts
DOJ Obtains First Criminal Guilty Plea for Monopolization Conduct in Decades
The Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) suggested at the beginning of the year that it would consider criminally prosecuting monopolization conduct—a departure from antitrust enforcement of the past several decades.1 The DOJ has now done so. On October 31, 2022, Nathan Zito, president of Z&Z Asphalt (Z&Z), a paving and asphalt contractor, pleaded guilty to violating Section 2 of the Sherman Act by attempting to monopolize the markets for highway crack-sealing services in Montana and Wyoming.2
Alerts
Seven Directors Resign from Five Public Company Boards
Last month, we reported that the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) had threatened multiple public companies, private equity investors, and individuals with lawsuits for violating the ban on interlocking directorates under Section 8 of the Clayton Act. Section 8 prohibits the same firm or individual from sitting on the boards of competing companies. The DOJ based its claim of alleged violations on information that it gleaned from SEC filings, earnings calls, and other public sources.
Alerts
DOJ Launches Enforcement Initiative Against “Interlocking Directorates”
In what appears to be a significant expansion of its antitrust enforcement efforts, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) issued letters to multiple public companies, investors, and individuals this week, stating it may bring lawsuits against them for maintaining “interlocking directorates” in violation of Section 8 of the Clayton Antitrust Act (15 U.S.C. § 19).
View All
Insights
Alerts
Court Dismisses DOJ’s Latest “No-Poach” Case Before Jury Deliberations
In another blow to the U.S. Department of Justice’s (DOJ’s) efforts to criminalize “no-poach” and “wage-fixing” agreements, a federal judge terminated the DOJ’s latest “no-poach” case mid-trial before jury deliberations.
Newsletters
2022 Antitrust Year in Review
We are proud to share the 2022 Antitrust Year in Review, which discusses significant developments in antitrust law, policy, and enforcement over the past year. First, the report spotlights recent outcomes in court for U.S. agency enforcement litigation and discusses major changes in the law that create substantial new antitrust obligations, as well as updated policy and enforcement guidelines. Then, the merger enforcement section describes significant merger control activity by enforcers in the U.S., EU, and UK, and the civil conduct enforcement section outlines enforcer activity in investigating and challenging non-merger conduct. Finally, the report provides an update on global cartel enforcement policy and activity, and concludes with a survey of significant private antitrust litigation in the United States and UK.
Alerts
FTC Reinterprets FTC Act to Include Broad Powers Related to “Interlocking Directorates”
In what might be a further expansion of antitrust enforcement of interlocking directorates, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued a policy statement announcing that it now interprets Section 5 of the FTC Act to grant it authority to take enforcement action against interlocking directorates or officers of competing firms that do not fall within the “literal language of the Clayton Act.”1
Alerts
DOJ Obtains First Criminal Guilty Plea for Monopolization Conduct in Decades
The Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) suggested at the beginning of the year that it would consider criminally prosecuting monopolization conduct—a departure from antitrust enforcement of the past several decades.1 The DOJ has now done so. On October 31, 2022, Nathan Zito, president of Z&Z Asphalt (Z&Z), a paving and asphalt contractor, pleaded guilty to violating Section 2 of the Sherman Act by attempting to monopolize the markets for highway crack-sealing services in Montana and Wyoming.2
Alerts
Seven Directors Resign from Five Public Company Boards
Last month, we reported that the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) had threatened multiple public companies, private equity investors, and individuals with lawsuits for violating the ban on interlocking directorates under Section 8 of the Clayton Act. Section 8 prohibits the same firm or individual from sitting on the boards of competing companies. The DOJ based its claim of alleged violations on information that it gleaned from SEC filings, earnings calls, and other public sources.
Alerts
DOJ Launches Enforcement Initiative Against “Interlocking Directorates”
In what appears to be a significant expansion of its antitrust enforcement efforts, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) issued letters to multiple public companies, investors, and individuals this week, stating it may bring lawsuits against them for maintaining “interlocking directorates” in violation of Section 8 of the Clayton Antitrust Act (15 U.S.C. § 19).
View All
Speaking Engagements
Future of Antitrust Enforcement in the Biden Administration
Legal Experts and former U.S. government officials discuss what will be the new Administration’s priorities. Join USC Gould for this hour-long online panel conversation.
Events
Speaking Engagements
Future of Antitrust Enforcement in the Biden Administration
Legal Experts and former U.S. government officials discuss what will be the new Administration’s priorities. Join USC Gould for this hour-long online panel conversation.
Jeffrey C. Bank
Partner
Washington, D.C.
Jeff represents companies in antitrust disputes, including multi-district litigations and cartel cases.
  • Antitrust and Competition
View Profile
Beau Buffier
Partner
Boston
Beau Buffier is an antitrust partner in the Boston and New York offices of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, where his practice focuses on defending clients in merger investigations before the Federal Trade Commission and Department of Justice as well as non-U.S. antitrust agencies including the CMA (UK). Beau also represents domestic and foreign clients in connection with various antitrust issues concerning cartel matters, abuse of dominance, joint ventures, distribution arrangements, intellectual property, competitor collaborations and Hart-Scott-Rodino compliance. Beau has defended substantive merger investigations and other civil and criminal investigations involving a wide variety of industries, including semiconductors, telecommunications, enterprise software, internet platforms, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, chemicals, retailing, airlines, automotive parts, and entertainment and ticketing.
  • Antitrust and Competition
View Profile
Jindrich Kloub
Partner
Brussels
Jindrich Kloub is a partner in the Brussels office of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, where he focuses on competition and antitrust matters, including civil and criminal enforcement efforts and investigations.
  • Antitrust and Competition
View Profile
Kenneth O'Rourke
Partner
Washington, D.C.
Ken represents companies in antitrust litigation, including complex cases and high-stakes disputes litigated in the U.S. and abroad.
  • Antitrust and Competition
View Profile
Chul Pak
Partner
New York
Chul represents manufacturers, services companies, and technology firms in antitrust litigation, mergers, and counseling.
  • Antitrust and Competition
View Profile
Mark R. Rosman
Partner
Washington, D.C.
Mark represents clients in antitrust matters, including cartel defense, enforcement investigations, and merger and civil non-merger cases.
  • Antitrust and Competition
View Profile
Brent Snyder
Partner
San Francisco
Brent Snyder is an antitrust partner in the San Francisco office of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, where he leads the firm's regulatory and compliance department. With more than 25 years of civil and criminal litigation and trial experience in both the private and public sectors, Brent is a leading U.S. and internationally recognized antitrust and competition attorney with deep expertise in antitrust cartels and related criminal violations.

Prior to joining the firm, Brent served as chief executive officer of the Hong Kong Competition Commission (HKCC), Hong Kong’s competition enforcement agency, where he had day-to-day responsibility for all aspects of its enforcement, policy, advocacy, and administration functions. During his tenure, which involved overseeing a budget of approximately $15 million, the HKCC set several important litigation precedents; significantly increased the volume, variety, and complexity of its enforcement work; improved its leniency and cooperation incentives; and enhanced its competition policy and advocacy work.
  • Antitrust and Competition
View Profile
Jeff VanHooreweghe
Partner
San Francisco
Jeff represents clients in antitrust matters, including criminal grand jury investigations, civil investigations, private litigation, merger clearance, and compliance counseling.
  • Antitrust and Competition
View Profile
Wendy Huang Waszmer
Partner
New York
Wendy represents companies and individual clients in high-stakes antitrust and other government investigations, federal court litigation, and civil commercial disputes.
  • Antitrust and Competition
View Profile
Stuart M. Chemtob
Senior Of Counsel
Washington, D.C.
Focuses on government conduct investigations, litigation and arbitrations involving antitrust and licensing issues, and global antitrust counseling.
  • Antitrust and Competition
View Profile
View All
People
Jeffrey C. Bank
Partner
Washington, D.C.
Jeff represents companies in antitrust disputes, including multi-district litigations and cartel cases.
  • Antitrust and Competition
View Profile
Beau Buffier
Partner
Boston
Beau Buffier is an antitrust partner in the Boston and New York offices of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, where his practice focuses on defending clients in merger investigations before the Federal Trade Commission and Department of Justice as well as non-U.S. antitrust agencies including the CMA (UK). Beau also represents domestic and foreign clients in connection with various antitrust issues concerning cartel matters, abuse of dominance, joint ventures, distribution arrangements, intellectual property, competitor collaborations and Hart-Scott-Rodino compliance. Beau has defended substantive merger investigations and other civil and criminal investigations involving a wide variety of industries, including semiconductors, telecommunications, enterprise software, internet platforms, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, chemicals, retailing, airlines, automotive parts, and entertainment and ticketing.
  • Antitrust and Competition
View Profile
Jindrich Kloub
Partner
Brussels
Jindrich Kloub is a partner in the Brussels office of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, where he focuses on competition and antitrust matters, including civil and criminal enforcement efforts and investigations.
  • Antitrust and Competition
View Profile
Kenneth O'Rourke
Partner
Washington, D.C.
Ken represents companies in antitrust litigation, including complex cases and high-stakes disputes litigated in the U.S. and abroad.
  • Antitrust and Competition
View Profile
Chul Pak
Partner
New York
Chul represents manufacturers, services companies, and technology firms in antitrust litigation, mergers, and counseling.
  • Antitrust and Competition
View Profile
Mark R. Rosman
Partner
Washington, D.C.
Mark represents clients in antitrust matters, including cartel defense, enforcement investigations, and merger and civil non-merger cases.
  • Antitrust and Competition
View Profile
Brent Snyder
Partner
San Francisco
Brent Snyder is an antitrust partner in the San Francisco office of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, where he leads the firm's regulatory and compliance department. With more than 25 years of civil and criminal litigation and trial experience in both the private and public sectors, Brent is a leading U.S. and internationally recognized antitrust and competition attorney with deep expertise in antitrust cartels and related criminal violations.

Prior to joining the firm, Brent served as chief executive officer of the Hong Kong Competition Commission (HKCC), Hong Kong’s competition enforcement agency, where he had day-to-day responsibility for all aspects of its enforcement, policy, advocacy, and administration functions. During his tenure, which involved overseeing a budget of approximately $15 million, the HKCC set several important litigation precedents; significantly increased the volume, variety, and complexity of its enforcement work; improved its leniency and cooperation incentives; and enhanced its competition policy and advocacy work.
  • Antitrust and Competition
View Profile
Jeff VanHooreweghe
Partner
San Francisco
Jeff represents clients in antitrust matters, including criminal grand jury investigations, civil investigations, private litigation, merger clearance, and compliance counseling.
  • Antitrust and Competition
View Profile
Wendy Huang Waszmer
Partner
New York
Wendy represents companies and individual clients in high-stakes antitrust and other government investigations, federal court litigation, and civil commercial disputes.
  • Antitrust and Competition
View Profile
Stuart M. Chemtob
Senior Of Counsel
Washington, D.C.
Focuses on government conduct investigations, litigation and arbitrations involving antitrust and licensing issues, and global antitrust counseling.
  • Antitrust and Competition
View Profile
View All

Representative Government Criminal Enforcement Matters

Examples of our representations include the following:

  • Represents companies and a high-level executive in DOJ “no poach” investigations of illegal hiring practices 
  • Represents a Korean company and its president in an investigation by the DOJ’s Procurement Collusion Strike Force of bid-rigging in the fuel supply industry 
  • Represents an individual in a multi-jurisdictional investigation by the DOJ’s Procurement Collusion Strike Force of bid-rigging in the security industry 
  • Represents a leading pharmaceutical company in an industry-wide federal grand jury investigation, as well as state investigation 
  • Represents an international supplier of electrical components in a multi-jurisdictional cartel investigation involving price-fixing and market allocation allegations 
  • Represents a financial services company before the DOJ in a cartel (bid-rigging) investigation 
  • Represents an individual in the DOJ’s criminal investigation of a conspiracy to fix prices and rig bids for broiler chicken products 
  • Represented several companies and individuals in the auto parts investigation conducted by multiple antitrust bodies, including the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice, European Commission, and Japan Fair Trade Commission, among others 
  • Represented a company in a multi-jurisdictional investigation involving electronic components, as well as in follow-on class action suits 
  • Represented several individuals in separate multi-jurisdictional and multi-agency investigations involving the financial services industry 
  • Represented a high-level executive in an investigation involving the collegiatemultimedia rights business 
  • Represented a high-level executive in federal and state criminal investigations in the energy industry, as well as follow-on civil litigation
  • Represented a high-level executive of an international ocean carrier in an investigation involving the ocean shipping industry
  • Represented an international air carrier in a multi-year, international price-fixing investigation, as well as in civil follow-on class action suits
  • Represented a leading supplier in the DOJ's DRAM investigation
  • Represented a consumer goods supplier inclosing a criminal investigation conducted by DOJ 
  • Represented an individual in a case involving the transfer of money in Latin America
  • Represented a shipping company seeking immunity from the DOJ under the Shipping Act
  • Represented a company involved in a criminal investigation relating to construction contracts in Egypt
  • Represented a SRAM supplier in connection with litigation derived from the DOJ's investigation into SRAM price-fixing allegations
  • Represented a client in connection with the DOJ's E-Rate investigation relating to bid rigging in the provision of computer supplies to government-funded education programs
  • Represented an angel investor in a DOJ investigation into a potential bid-rigging scheme in the venture capital market
  • Represented a private equity firm in a bid-rigging investigation by the DOJ
  • Assisted an energy company and one of its employees in a bid-rigging investigation
Representative Matters

Representative Government Criminal Enforcement Matters

Examples of our representations include the following:

  • Represents companies and a high-level executive in DOJ “no poach” investigations of illegal hiring practices 
  • Represents a Korean company and its president in an investigation by the DOJ’s Procurement Collusion Strike Force of bid-rigging in the fuel supply industry 
  • Represents an individual in a multi-jurisdictional investigation by the DOJ’s Procurement Collusion Strike Force of bid-rigging in the security industry 
  • Represents a leading pharmaceutical company in an industry-wide federal grand jury investigation, as well as state investigation 
  • Represents an international supplier of electrical components in a multi-jurisdictional cartel investigation involving price-fixing and market allocation allegations 
  • Represents a financial services company before the DOJ in a cartel (bid-rigging) investigation 
  • Represents an individual in the DOJ’s criminal investigation of a conspiracy to fix prices and rig bids for broiler chicken products 
  • Represented several companies and individuals in the auto parts investigation conducted by multiple antitrust bodies, including the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice, European Commission, and Japan Fair Trade Commission, among others 
  • Represented a company in a multi-jurisdictional investigation involving electronic components, as well as in follow-on class action suits 
  • Represented several individuals in separate multi-jurisdictional and multi-agency investigations involving the financial services industry 
  • Represented a high-level executive in an investigation involving the collegiatemultimedia rights business 
  • Represented a high-level executive in federal and state criminal investigations in the energy industry, as well as follow-on civil litigation
  • Represented a high-level executive of an international ocean carrier in an investigation involving the ocean shipping industry
  • Represented an international air carrier in a multi-year, international price-fixing investigation, as well as in civil follow-on class action suits
  • Represented a leading supplier in the DOJ's DRAM investigation
  • Represented a consumer goods supplier inclosing a criminal investigation conducted by DOJ 
  • Represented an individual in a case involving the transfer of money in Latin America
  • Represented a shipping company seeking immunity from the DOJ under the Shipping Act
  • Represented a company involved in a criminal investigation relating to construction contracts in Egypt
  • Represented a SRAM supplier in connection with litigation derived from the DOJ's investigation into SRAM price-fixing allegations
  • Represented a client in connection with the DOJ's E-Rate investigation relating to bid rigging in the provision of computer supplies to government-funded education programs
  • Represented an angel investor in a DOJ investigation into a potential bid-rigging scheme in the venture capital market
  • Represented a private equity firm in a bid-rigging investigation by the DOJ
  • Assisted an energy company and one of its employees in a bid-rigging investigation
Related Practices
  • Antitrust and Competition
Recent Insights
Alerts
Court Dismisses DOJ’s Latest “No-Poach” Case Before Jury Deliberations
In another blow to the U.S. Department of Justice’s (DOJ’s) efforts to criminalize “no-poach” and “wage-fixing” agreements, a federal judge terminated the DOJ’s latest “no-poach” case mid-trial before jury deliberations.
Learn More
Newsletters
2022 Antitrust Year in Review
We are proud to share the 2022 Antitrust Year in Review, which discusses significant developments in antitrust law, policy, and enforcement over the past year. First, the report spotlights recent outcomes in court for U.S. agency enforcement litigation and discusses major changes in the law that create substantial new antitrust obligations, as well as updated policy and enforcement guidelines. Then, the merger enforcement section describes significant merger control activity by enforcers in the U.S., EU, and UK, and the civil conduct enforcement section outlines enforcer activity in investigating and challenging non-merger conduct. Finally, the report provides an update on global cartel enforcement policy and activity, and concludes with a survey of significant private antitrust litigation in the United States and UK.
Learn More
View All
Recent Events
Speaking Engagements
Future of Antitrust Enforcement in the Biden Administration
Legal Experts and former U.S. government officials discuss what will be the new Administration’s priorities. Join USC Gould for this hour-long online panel conversation.
Learn More
Newsletters
2020 Antitrust Year in Review
Our antitrust practice is pleased to present a report summarizing the most significant antitrust matters and developments of the past year. The publication examines the final year of antitrust enforcement under the Trump administration, analyzes actions by U.S. antitrust agencies and enforcers in other jurisdictions worldwide across a range of merger review, civil conduct, and criminal enforcement matters; and highlights new guidance issued by U.S. agencies and developments in the treatment of efficiencies in merger analysis. It also notes areas of cooperation and contention between U.S. agencies, examines the DOJ’s enforcement agenda and leniency program, and offers an update on private antitrust litigation, among other content.
Read the 2020 Antitrust Year in Review
  • people
  • insights
  • about us
  • careers
  • Binder
  • Alumni
  • Mailing List Signup
  • Employee Login
  • Client FTP Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Accessibility
WSGR logo
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Instagram
Youtube
Copyright © 2023 Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati. All Rights Reserved.