WSGR logoWSGR logo
WSGR logo
  • Experience
  • People
  • Insights
  • About Us
  • Careers

  • Practice Areas
  • Industries

  • Corporate
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Patents and Innovations
  • Regulatory
  • Technology Transactions

  • Capital Markets
  • Corporate Governance
  • Corporate Life Sciences
  • Derivatives
  • Emerging Companies and Venture Capital
  • Employee Benefits and Compensation
  • Energy and Climate Solutions
  • Executive Advisory Program
  • Finance and Structured Finance
  • Fund Formation
  • Greater China
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Private Equity
  • Public Company Representation
  • Real Estate
  • Restructuring
  • Shareholder Engagement and Activism
  • Tax
  • U.S. Expansion
  • Wealthtech

  • Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs)

  • Environmental, Social, and Governance

  • AI and Data Center Infrastructure
  • Energy Regulation and Competition
  • Project Development and M&A
  • Project Finance and Tax Credit Transactions
  • Sustainability and Decarbonization
  • Transportation Electrification

  • U.S. Expansion Library and Resources

  • Post-Grant Review
  • Trademark and Advertising

  • Antitrust Litigation
  • Arbitration
  • Board and Internal Investigations
  • Class Action Litigation
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Consumer Litigation
  • Corporate Governance Litigation
  • Employment Litigation
  • Executive Branch Updates
  • Government Investigations
  • Internet Strategy and Litigation
  • Patent Litigation
  • Securities Litigation
  • State Attorneys General
  • Supreme Court and Appellate Practice
  • Trade Secret Litigation
  • Trademark and Copyright Litigation
  • Trial
  • White Collar Crime

  • Advertising, Promotions, and Marketing
  • Antitrust and Competition
  • Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. (CFIUS)
  • Communications
  • Data, Privacy, and Cybersecurity
  • Export Control and Sanctions
  • FCPA and Anti-Corruption
  • FDA Regulatory, Healthcare, and Consumer Products
  • Federal Trade Commission
  • Fintech and Financial Services
  • Government Contracts
  • National Security and Trade
  • Payments
  • State Attorneys General
  • Strategic Risk and Crisis Management
  • Tariffs, Customs, and Import Compliance

  • Antitrust and Intellectual Property
  • Antitrust Civil Enforcement
  • Antitrust Compliance and Business Strategy
  • Antitrust Criminal Enforcement
  • Antitrust Litigation
  • Antitrust Merger Clearance
  • European Competition Law
  • Third-Party Merger and Non-Merger Antitrust Representation

  • Anti-Money Laundering
  • Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence (FOCI)
  • Team Telecom

  • AI in Healthcare
  • Animal Health
  • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
  • Aviation
  • Biotech
  • Blockchain and Cryptocurrency
  • Clean Energy
  • Climate and Clean Technologies
  • Communications and Networking
  • Consumer Products and Services
  • Data Storage and Cloud
  • Defense Tech
  • Diagnostics, Life Science Tools, and Deep Tech
  • Digital Health
  • Digital Media and Entertainment
  • Electronic Gaming
  • Fintech and Financial Services
  • FoodTech and AgTech
  • Global Generics
  • Internet
  • Life Sciences
  • Medical Devices
  • Mobile Devices
  • Mobility
  • NewSpace
  • Quantum Computing
  • Semiconductors
  • Software

  • Offices
  • Country Desks
  • Events
  • Community
  • Our Diversity
  • Sustainability
  • Our Values
  • Board of Directors
  • Management Team

  • Austin
  • Boston
  • Boulder
  • Brussels
  • Century City
  • Hong Kong
  • London
  • Los Angeles
  • New York
  • Palo Alto
  • Salt Lake City
  • San Diego
  • San Francisco
  • Seattle
  • Shanghai
  • Washington, D.C.
  • Wilmington, DE

  • Law Students
  • Judicial Clerks
  • Experienced Attorneys
  • Patent Agents
  • Business Professionals
  • Alternative Legal Careers
  • Contact Recruiting

Arbitration

Open PDF
  • A Track Record of Success

    Wilson Sonsini has handled hundreds of arbitration matters and helped clients secure awards and settlements leading to the recovery of over $1 billion; likewise, the firm has successfully defended clients against claims worth at least this amount.

  • Experience Before Key Arbitral Bodies

    Our attorneys represent clients in ad hoc arbitrations and matters administered by the American Arbitration Association, JAMS, and the International Institute for Conflict Prevention & Resolution, as well as in international arbitration administered by the International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR), the International Court of Arbitration of the ICC, and the Hong Kong International Arbitration Center (HKIAC), among others.

  • Arbitration Experience Across Key Areas of Practice

    Wilson Sonsini's experience largely includes intellectual property and technology-focused disputes; claims related to commercial and technology transactions, including M&A and joint ventures; and employment matters.

Wilson Sonsini's domestic and international arbitration practice has earned a reputation for excellence through its successful representation of groundbreaking technology, energy, and pharmaceutical industry leaders. The firm's arbitration practice has grown substantially over the past several decades, particularly as Wilson Sonsini's clients matured and increasingly became ensnared in legal disputes. Backed by the resources of a highly regarded, international law firm, Wilson Sonsini's arbitration attorneys represent companies and individuals in high-profile cases that have potentially profound ramifications for each client.

As arbitrations have become increasingly common means of resolving business disputes, the firm has amassed experience representing clients before key arbitral bodies both within the U.S. and abroad. For example, in addition to providing representation in a diverse range of proceedings held in the U.S., including in ad hoc arbitrations and matters administered by the American Arbitration Association (AAA), JAMS, and the International Institute for Conflict Prevention & Resolution (CPR), Wilson Sonsini has experience representing clients in international arbitration administered by:

  • The American Arbitration Association's International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR)
  • The International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce
  • Hong Kong International Arbitration Center (HKIAC)
  • The Grand Court of the Cayman Islands
  • London Arbitration Center
  • Singapore International Arbitration Centre
  • World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Arbitration and Mediation Center

Wilson Sonsini's arbitration experience dates back to the firm's early representation of clients in voluntary and required arbitrations, mediations, and other agreed-upon alternatives to traditional litigation proceedings. To date, Wilson Sonsini has handled hundreds of arbitration matters and has helped clients secure awards and settlements leading to the recovery of over a billion dollars. Likewise, Wilson Sonsini has succeeded in defending clients against claims worth at least this amount.

The scope of our relevant experience includes disputes commonly associated with arbitration, particularly intellectual property and technology-focused disputes; claims related to commercial and technology transactions, including M&A and joint ventures; and employment matters.

By way of example, Wilson Sonsini's arbitration experience includes:

  • Helping a publicly traded Indian company specializing in protocol stack software solutions recover nearly $100 million in a dispute over royalties for sales of baseband processor chipsets by a licensee
  • Successfully defending a U.S.-based Fortune 500 pharmaceutical company against claims for breach of contract brought by a former supply chain partner before the ICDR
  • Persuading an international arbitration tribunal to reject claims brought by a major Korean telecommunications company that it held a continuing license to technology owned by a telecommunications client
  • Assisting a U.S.-based technology developer to recover hundreds of millions of dollars in royalties from major handset manufacturers in disputes over 2G, 3G, and 4G wireless technologies
  • Representing a leading supplier of network security solutions software in a baseball-type arbitration proceeding to resolve claims of patent infringement
  • Obtaining an award in favor of a leading software products and services provider faced with a claim of improper termination of a partnership agreement, prevailing on every issue and entitling the client to recover attorneys' fees
  • Achieving a complete dismissal of claims on behalf of a multi-national healthcare company in a dispute over delays in cancer drug development
  • Successfully representing members of a consulting company in an arbitrated dispute regarding tens of millions of dollars of unpaid equity-based compensation
  • Representing the selling shareholders in a dispute over earn-out payments under an M&A sale agreement claimed to be owed from the acquiring corporation; obtained a successful result following a four-week hearing
  • Overcoming claims against a global electronics manufacturing services provider brought by a former executive arising from an alleged breach of an employment agreement and prevailing on client's cross-claim
  • Successfully defended a private equity consortium in the first expedited hearing process brought under the HKIAC; obtained a complete victory for the client, including dismissal of all claims and an award of substantial costs and fees

Our arbitration attorneys are fully coordinated across the firm's 17 offices in key markets in the U.S., Greater China, and Europe. Depending on each client's needs, our attorneys can rapidly scale and draw from a wealth of industry knowledge, language fluencies, and other resources.

Overview

Wilson Sonsini's domestic and international arbitration practice has earned a reputation for excellence through its successful representation of groundbreaking technology, energy, and pharmaceutical industry leaders. The firm's arbitration practice has grown substantially over the past several decades, particularly as Wilson Sonsini's clients matured and increasingly became ensnared in legal disputes. Backed by the resources of a highly regarded, international law firm, Wilson Sonsini's arbitration attorneys represent companies and individuals in high-profile cases that have potentially profound ramifications for each client.

As arbitrations have become increasingly common means of resolving business disputes, the firm has amassed experience representing clients before key arbitral bodies both within the U.S. and abroad. For example, in addition to providing representation in a diverse range of proceedings held in the U.S., including in ad hoc arbitrations and matters administered by the American Arbitration Association (AAA), JAMS, and the International Institute for Conflict Prevention & Resolution (CPR), Wilson Sonsini has experience representing clients in international arbitration administered by:

  • The American Arbitration Association's International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR)
  • The International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce
  • Hong Kong International Arbitration Center (HKIAC)
  • The Grand Court of the Cayman Islands
  • London Arbitration Center
  • Singapore International Arbitration Centre
  • World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Arbitration and Mediation Center

Wilson Sonsini's arbitration experience dates back to the firm's early representation of clients in voluntary and required arbitrations, mediations, and other agreed-upon alternatives to traditional litigation proceedings. To date, Wilson Sonsini has handled hundreds of arbitration matters and has helped clients secure awards and settlements leading to the recovery of over a billion dollars. Likewise, Wilson Sonsini has succeeded in defending clients against claims worth at least this amount.

The scope of our relevant experience includes disputes commonly associated with arbitration, particularly intellectual property and technology-focused disputes; claims related to commercial and technology transactions, including M&A and joint ventures; and employment matters.

By way of example, Wilson Sonsini's arbitration experience includes:

  • Helping a publicly traded Indian company specializing in protocol stack software solutions recover nearly $100 million in a dispute over royalties for sales of baseband processor chipsets by a licensee
  • Successfully defending a U.S.-based Fortune 500 pharmaceutical company against claims for breach of contract brought by a former supply chain partner before the ICDR
  • Persuading an international arbitration tribunal to reject claims brought by a major Korean telecommunications company that it held a continuing license to technology owned by a telecommunications client
  • Assisting a U.S.-based technology developer to recover hundreds of millions of dollars in royalties from major handset manufacturers in disputes over 2G, 3G, and 4G wireless technologies
  • Representing a leading supplier of network security solutions software in a baseball-type arbitration proceeding to resolve claims of patent infringement
  • Obtaining an award in favor of a leading software products and services provider faced with a claim of improper termination of a partnership agreement, prevailing on every issue and entitling the client to recover attorneys' fees
  • Achieving a complete dismissal of claims on behalf of a multi-national healthcare company in a dispute over delays in cancer drug development
  • Successfully representing members of a consulting company in an arbitrated dispute regarding tens of millions of dollars of unpaid equity-based compensation
  • Representing the selling shareholders in a dispute over earn-out payments under an M&A sale agreement claimed to be owed from the acquiring corporation; obtained a successful result following a four-week hearing
  • Overcoming claims against a global electronics manufacturing services provider brought by a former executive arising from an alleged breach of an employment agreement and prevailing on client's cross-claim
  • Successfully defended a private equity consortium in the first expedited hearing process brought under the HKIAC; obtained a complete victory for the client, including dismissal of all claims and an award of substantial costs and fees

Our arbitration attorneys are fully coordinated across the firm's 17 offices in key markets in the U.S., Greater China, and Europe. Depending on each client's needs, our attorneys can rapidly scale and draw from a wealth of industry knowledge, language fluencies, and other resources.

Client Highlights
Wilson Sonsini Secures HKIAC Arbitration Victory for Clients
On February 6, 2026, the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC) issued a partial award (the Partial Award) in a dispute between Leed Education Holding Limited, National Education Holding Limited, and Hyde Education Holding Limited (collectively, the Claimants) and Minsheng Vocational Education Company Limited (the Respondent), a subsidiary of Minsheng Education Group Company Limited (Minsheng Education). Wilson Sonsini represents the Claimants in the arbitration.
Alerts
SEC Issues Policy Statement Clarifying View on Mandatory Arbitration Provisions
On September 17, 2025, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC or Commission) approved a Policy Statement clarifying the SEC’s position on accelerating the effective date of registration statements for the offer and sale of securities under the Securities Act filed by companies that have mandatory arbitration provisions in their governing documents. The Policy Statement represents a significant development in the SEC’s approach to filings by companies with mandatory arbitration provisions applicable to claims under the federal securities laws—and potentially other governance claims as well. The Policy Statement also comes at a time of growing debate over the proper role of stockholder litigation as a policy matter and the optimal approach to such matters under state corporate law.
Client Highlights
Wilson Sonsini Defeats $341 Million Arbitration Claim Against Aadi Bioscience
On September 26, 2024, an international arbitration tribunal delivered a unanimous award in favor of Wilson Sonsini’s client, Aadi Bioscience, Inc., and decisively rejected the claimant’s multimillion-dollar demand for damages.
Client Highlights
Cayman Court of Appeal Dismisses Appeal Against Interim Quia Timet Injunction Granted Pursuant to Section 54 of Arbitration Act
The Court of Appeal of the Cayman Islands Reaffirms Ruling of the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands and Provides Further Guidance on the Interpretation of Section 54 of the Arbitration Act
Alerts
Seventh Circuit Hears Oral Argument About Mass Arbitration and Class Action Waivers
In the latest development regarding so-called mass arbitrations, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit recently heard argument in a case that any company with consumer-facing terms should be following. In Wallrich v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc., No. 23-2842 (7th Cir. Nov. 8, 2023), Samsung was the target of a mass-arbitration campaign, i.e., a coordinated effort where plaintiffs lawyers line up thousands of individual claimants and file identical arbitration demands for them in order to force the company (here, Samsung) to pay millions of dollars in arbitration filing fees having nothing to do with the merits of the claims.  
Client Highlights
Cayman Court Interprets Section 54 of Arbitration Act for Interim Quia Timet Injunction
Order Marks First Time the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands Has Interpreted Section 54 of Arbitration Act
View All
Insights
Client Highlights
Wilson Sonsini Secures HKIAC Arbitration Victory for Clients
On February 6, 2026, the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC) issued a partial award (the Partial Award) in a dispute between Leed Education Holding Limited, National Education Holding Limited, and Hyde Education Holding Limited (collectively, the Claimants) and Minsheng Vocational Education Company Limited (the Respondent), a subsidiary of Minsheng Education Group Company Limited (Minsheng Education). Wilson Sonsini represents the Claimants in the arbitration.
Alerts
SEC Issues Policy Statement Clarifying View on Mandatory Arbitration Provisions
On September 17, 2025, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC or Commission) approved a Policy Statement clarifying the SEC’s position on accelerating the effective date of registration statements for the offer and sale of securities under the Securities Act filed by companies that have mandatory arbitration provisions in their governing documents. The Policy Statement represents a significant development in the SEC’s approach to filings by companies with mandatory arbitration provisions applicable to claims under the federal securities laws—and potentially other governance claims as well. The Policy Statement also comes at a time of growing debate over the proper role of stockholder litigation as a policy matter and the optimal approach to such matters under state corporate law.
Client Highlights
Wilson Sonsini Defeats $341 Million Arbitration Claim Against Aadi Bioscience
On September 26, 2024, an international arbitration tribunal delivered a unanimous award in favor of Wilson Sonsini’s client, Aadi Bioscience, Inc., and decisively rejected the claimant’s multimillion-dollar demand for damages.
Client Highlights
Cayman Court of Appeal Dismisses Appeal Against Interim Quia Timet Injunction Granted Pursuant to Section 54 of Arbitration Act
The Court of Appeal of the Cayman Islands Reaffirms Ruling of the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands and Provides Further Guidance on the Interpretation of Section 54 of the Arbitration Act
Alerts
Seventh Circuit Hears Oral Argument About Mass Arbitration and Class Action Waivers
In the latest development regarding so-called mass arbitrations, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit recently heard argument in a case that any company with consumer-facing terms should be following. In Wallrich v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc., No. 23-2842 (7th Cir. Nov. 8, 2023), Samsung was the target of a mass-arbitration campaign, i.e., a coordinated effort where plaintiffs lawyers line up thousands of individual claimants and file identical arbitration demands for them in order to force the company (here, Samsung) to pay millions of dollars in arbitration filing fees having nothing to do with the merits of the claims.  
Client Highlights
Cayman Court Interprets Section 54 of Arbitration Act for Interim Quia Timet Injunction
Order Marks First Time the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands Has Interpreted Section 54 of Arbitration Act
View All
Speaking Engagements
MassArbCon Tech Legal 2023
MassArbCon is a comprehensive two-day summit to discuss strategies and trends regarding mass action arbitration. The conference brings subject matter and legal experts involved in different aspects of the law to help attorneys learn about the intricacies of mass actions — from client intake to management, mediations, negotiation, administration, business development, and how law firms can implement technology and automation to lead to digital transformation. Over the past two years, MassArbCon has created a community that celebrates diversity, fosters inclusion, and upholds civility in the legal industry by blending technology and legal expertise.
Events
Speaking Engagements
MassArbCon Tech Legal 2023
MassArbCon is a comprehensive two-day summit to discuss strategies and trends regarding mass action arbitration. The conference brings subject matter and legal experts involved in different aspects of the law to help attorneys learn about the intricacies of mass actions — from client intake to management, mediations, negotiation, administration, business development, and how law firms can implement technology and automation to lead to digital transformation. Over the past two years, MassArbCon has created a community that celebrates diversity, fosters inclusion, and upholds civility in the legal industry by blending technology and legal expertise.
David J. Berger
Partner
Palo Alto
David is an expert in and leader of the corporate governance and shareholder activism practices.
  • Litigation
View Profile
William B. Chandler III
Partner
Wilmington, DE
Mr. Chandler represents clients in governance matters, committee assignments, internal investigations, and transactional matters.
  • Litigation
View Profile
Weiheng Chen
Partner
Hong Kong
Weiheng leads Wilson Sonsini's Greater China practice and he focuses on capital markets, M&A, and private equity transactions.
  • Corporate
View Profile
Leo Cunningham
Partner
Palo Alto
Leo is a former federal prosecutor who represents clients in sensitive litigation matters, including federal and state court trials.
  • Litigation
View Profile
Katherine L. Henderson
Partner
San Francisco
Katherine represents companies and their officers and directors in stockholder class actions, derivative suits, and complex commercial litigation.
  • Litigation
View Profile
Michael B. Levin
Partner
Palo Alto
Michael Levin focuses on IP litigation and counseling for tech companies with an emphasis on patent litigation.
  • Litigation
View Profile
Matthew R. Reed
Partner
Palo Alto
Matt practices in the areas of technology-focused international and domestic arbitration and intellectual property litigation, including patent litigation in U.S. district courts and the ITC, and trade secret disputes in state and federal court.
  • Litigation
View Profile
Maura L. Rees
Partner
Palo Alto
Maura is an experienced litigator who represents clients in complex commercial litigation and IP-related disputes, including copyright, trademark, patent, and antitrust matters, as well as consumer class actions.
  • Litigation
View Profile
Eli B. Richlin
Partner
New York
Eli Richlin practices in the New York office of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, where he maintains a broad practice focused on litigation pending in New York federal and state courts covering general commercial matters, intellectual property disputes, white collar criminal defense and internal investigations, and government and regulatory enforcement proceedings.
  • Litigation
View Profile
Joseph R. Slights III
Partner
Wilmington, DE
Joseph R. Slights III, a former Vice Chancellor of the Delaware Court of Chancery, is a partner in Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati's litigation department, where his practice focuses on corporate governance counseling and litigation. He was sworn in as Vice Chancellor of the Court of Chancery in 2016 after he was nominated by then-Governor Jack Markell and unanimously confirmed by the state senate.
  • Litigation
View Profile
View All
People
David J. Berger
Partner
Palo Alto
David is an expert in and leader of the corporate governance and shareholder activism practices.
  • Litigation
View Profile
William B. Chandler III
Partner
Wilmington, DE
Mr. Chandler represents clients in governance matters, committee assignments, internal investigations, and transactional matters.
  • Litigation
View Profile
Weiheng Chen
Partner
Hong Kong
Weiheng leads Wilson Sonsini's Greater China practice and he focuses on capital markets, M&A, and private equity transactions.
  • Corporate
View Profile
Leo Cunningham
Partner
Palo Alto
Leo is a former federal prosecutor who represents clients in sensitive litigation matters, including federal and state court trials.
  • Litigation
View Profile
Katherine L. Henderson
Partner
San Francisco
Katherine represents companies and their officers and directors in stockholder class actions, derivative suits, and complex commercial litigation.
  • Litigation
View Profile
Michael B. Levin
Partner
Palo Alto
Michael Levin focuses on IP litigation and counseling for tech companies with an emphasis on patent litigation.
  • Litigation
View Profile
Matthew R. Reed
Partner
Palo Alto
Matt practices in the areas of technology-focused international and domestic arbitration and intellectual property litigation, including patent litigation in U.S. district courts and the ITC, and trade secret disputes in state and federal court.
  • Litigation
View Profile
Maura L. Rees
Partner
Palo Alto
Maura is an experienced litigator who represents clients in complex commercial litigation and IP-related disputes, including copyright, trademark, patent, and antitrust matters, as well as consumer class actions.
  • Litigation
View Profile
Eli B. Richlin
Partner
New York
Eli Richlin practices in the New York office of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, where he maintains a broad practice focused on litigation pending in New York federal and state courts covering general commercial matters, intellectual property disputes, white collar criminal defense and internal investigations, and government and regulatory enforcement proceedings.
  • Litigation
View Profile
Joseph R. Slights III
Partner
Wilmington, DE
Joseph R. Slights III, a former Vice Chancellor of the Delaware Court of Chancery, is a partner in Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati's litigation department, where his practice focuses on corporate governance counseling and litigation. He was sworn in as Vice Chancellor of the Court of Chancery in 2016 after he was nominated by then-Governor Jack Markell and unanimously confirmed by the state senate.
  • Litigation
View Profile
View All
Related Practices
  • Litigation
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Employment Litigation
Recent Insights
Client Highlights
Wilson Sonsini Secures HKIAC Arbitration Victory for Clients
On February 6, 2026, the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC) issued a partial award (the Partial Award) in a dispute between Leed Education Holding Limited, National Education Holding Limited, and Hyde Education Holding Limited (collectively, the Claimants) and Minsheng Vocational Education Company Limited (the Respondent), a subsidiary of Minsheng Education Group Company Limited (Minsheng Education). Wilson Sonsini represents the Claimants in the arbitration.
Learn More
Alerts
SEC Issues Policy Statement Clarifying View on Mandatory Arbitration Provisions
On September 17, 2025, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC or Commission) approved a Policy Statement clarifying the SEC’s position on accelerating the effective date of registration statements for the offer and sale of securities under the Securities Act filed by companies that have mandatory arbitration provisions in their governing documents. The Policy Statement represents a significant development in the SEC’s approach to filings by companies with mandatory arbitration provisions applicable to claims under the federal securities laws—and potentially other governance claims as well. The Policy Statement also comes at a time of growing debate over the proper role of stockholder litigation as a policy matter and the optimal approach to such matters under state corporate law.
Learn More
View All
Recent Events
Speaking Engagements
MassArbCon Tech Legal 2023
MassArbCon is a comprehensive two-day summit to discuss strategies and trends regarding mass action arbitration. The conference brings subject matter and legal experts involved in different aspects of the law to help attorneys learn about the intricacies of mass actions — from client intake to management, mediations, negotiation, administration, business development, and how law firms can implement technology and automation to lead to digital transformation. Over the past two years, MassArbCon has created a community that celebrates diversity, fosters inclusion, and upholds civility in the legal industry by blending technology and legal expertise.
Learn More
  • people
  • insights
  • about us
  • careers
  • Binder
  • Alumni
  • Mailing List Signup
  • Client FTP Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Accessibility
WSGR logo
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Instagram
Youtube
Copyright © 2026 Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati. All Rights Reserved.