WSGR logoWSGR logo
WSGR logo
  • Experience
  • People
  • Insights
  • About Us
  • Careers

  • Practice Areas
  • Industries

  • Corporate
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Patents and Innovations
  • Regulatory
  • Technology Transactions

  • Capital Markets
  • Corporate Governance
  • Corporate Life Sciences
  • Derivatives
  • Emerging Companies and Venture Capital
  • Employee Benefits and Compensation
  • Energy and Climate Solutions
  • Executive Advisory Program
  • Finance and Structured Finance
  • Fund Formation
  • Greater China
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Private Equity
  • Public Company Representation
  • Real Estate
  • Restructuring
  • Shareholder Engagement and Activism
  • Tax
  • U.S. Expansion
  • Wealthtech

  • Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs)

  • Environmental, Social, and Governance

  • AI and Data Center Infrastructure
  • Energy Regulation and Competition
  • Project Development and M&A
  • Project Finance and Tax Credit Transactions
  • Sustainability and Decarbonization
  • Transportation Electrification

  • U.S. Expansion Library and Resources

  • Post-Grant Review
  • Trademark and Advertising

  • Antitrust Litigation
  • Arbitration
  • Board and Internal Investigations
  • Class Action Litigation
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Consumer Litigation
  • Corporate Governance Litigation
  • Employment Litigation
  • Executive Branch Updates
  • Government Investigations
  • Internet Strategy and Litigation
  • Patent Litigation
  • Securities Litigation
  • State Attorneys General
  • Supreme Court and Appellate Practice
  • Trade Secret Litigation
  • Trademark and Copyright Litigation
  • Trial
  • White Collar Crime

  • Advertising, Promotions, and Marketing
  • Antitrust and Competition
  • Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. (CFIUS)
  • Communications
  • Data, Privacy, and Cybersecurity
  • Export Control and Sanctions
  • FCPA and Anti-Corruption
  • FDA Regulatory, Healthcare, and Consumer Products
  • Federal Trade Commission
  • Fintech and Financial Services
  • Government Contracts
  • National Security and Trade
  • Payments
  • State Attorneys General
  • Strategic Risk and Crisis Management
  • Tariffs, Customs, and Import Compliance

  • Antitrust and Intellectual Property
  • Antitrust Civil Enforcement
  • Antitrust Compliance and Business Strategy
  • Antitrust Criminal Enforcement
  • Antitrust Litigation
  • Antitrust Merger Clearance
  • European Competition Law
  • Third-Party Merger and Non-Merger Antitrust Representation

  • Anti-Money Laundering
  • Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence (FOCI)
  • Team Telecom

  • AI in Healthcare
  • Animal Health
  • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
  • Aviation
  • Biotech
  • Blockchain and Cryptocurrency
  • Clean Energy
  • Climate and Clean Technologies
  • Communications and Networking
  • Consumer Products and Services
  • Data Storage and Cloud
  • Defense Tech
  • Diagnostics, Life Science Tools, and Deep Tech
  • Digital Health
  • Digital Media and Entertainment
  • Electronic Gaming
  • Fintech and Financial Services
  • FoodTech and AgTech
  • Global Generics
  • Internet
  • Life Sciences
  • Medical Devices
  • Mobile Devices
  • Mobility
  • NewSpace
  • Quantum Computing
  • Semiconductors
  • Software

  • Offices
  • Country Desks
  • Events
  • Community
  • Our Diversity
  • Sustainability
  • Our Values
  • Board of Directors
  • Management Team

  • Austin
  • Boston
  • Boulder
  • Brussels
  • Century City
  • Hong Kong
  • London
  • Los Angeles
  • New York
  • Palo Alto
  • Salt Lake City
  • San Diego
  • San Francisco
  • Seattle
  • Shanghai
  • Washington, D.C.
  • Wilmington, DE

  • Law Students
  • Judicial Clerks
  • Experienced Attorneys
  • Patent Agents
  • Business Professionals
  • Alternative Legal Careers
  • Contact Recruiting
Employee Plans System Update Expands Options for Plan Sponsors
Alerts
May 29, 2019

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) recently expanded self-correction opportunities under its Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System (EPCRS) in Revenue Procedure 2019-19, which was effective as of April 19, 2019. EPCRS permits plan sponsors to correct certain failures in the documentation and operation of qualified retirement plans. There are three methods under EPCRS of correcting plan failures—self-correction by the plan sponsor, requesting approval from the IRS through a submission under the voluntary correction program (VCP), and the audit closing agreement program (Audit CAP), which applies to failures identified by the IRS on audit. Self-correction is preferred as it allows plan sponsors to remedy certain plan failures without the costs, fees, or sanctions associated with VCP and Audit CAP.

This latest revision to EPCRS is welcome news to plan sponsors because it permits self-correction of certain additional--and quite common--failures related to plan loans, documents, and operations. The following is a summary of these additional self-correction opportunities that were not previously available.

Plan Loans Failures

The revised EPCRS expands self-correction of plan loan failures as follows:

  1. Reporting of deemed distributions 

    Deemed distribution may now be reported in the year of correction instead of the year of the failure. This helps plan participants avoid the inconvenience and cost of amending prior tax returns.

  2. Defaulted loan

    When a plan loan is not repaid on a timely basis, it is defaulted and results in the outstanding loan balance being reported as a taxable distribution to the participant. Prior to the expanded EPCRS, plan sponsors had to submit a request to the IRS under VCP to correct the tax implications of a loan default. Now, EPCRS allows the plan sponsor to avoid reporting the loan repayment failure as a taxable distribution by self-correcting the missed plan loan payments by providing a single lump-sum payment, reamortizing the outstanding loan balance, or a combination of the two. However, if the maximum permitted repayment period for the defaulted loan (e.g., five years for general purpose loans) has expired, then self-correction is not available.

    Additionally, the IRS notes that the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) will not issue a “no-action letter” with respect to loan defaults that are self-corrected. Accordingly, plan sponsors concerned with correcting an eligible fiduciary violation resulting from a plan loan failure (e.g., failure by the plan sponsor to properly withhold loan repayments) should still consider correcting through VCP if they wish to take advantage of the DOL’s Voluntary Fiduciary Correction Program.

  3. Failure to obtain spousal consent for a plan loan as required by plan terms

    Some qualified plans require spousal consent be obtained before a participant may elect a plan loan. Where spousal consent was required and not obtained, plan sponsors may self-correct by notifying the affected participant and the participant’s spouse and obtaining spousal consent for the plan loan. If the spouse does not consent, however, then self-correction is not available. 

  4. Number of plan loans to a participant exceeds the number of loans permitted by written plan terms 

    Where a participant was inadvertently permitted to take plan loans that exceed the number of loans allowed by the plan’s terms, the plan sponsor may make a retroactive plan amendment to increase the number of permitted loans. In order to make use of this correction method (i) the amendment must comply with Sections 401(a) and 72(p) of the Internal Revenue Code (the code); and (ii) the plan loans, including those in excess of the plan’s terms, must be available to either all participants or only to one or more non-highly compensated employees.

Plan Document Failures

Plan sponsors can also use self-correction for certain plan document failures, such as a failure to adopt good faith or interim amendments. Self-correction is not permitted for a failure to timely adopt a qualified plan or written 403(b) plan document in the first place. It also does not apply to the failure to adopt a discretionary amendment, for example, an amendment to permit after-tax contributions or to change the definition of deferral compensation.

Self-corrections of plan document failures may be made if the plan has a favorable IRS determination or opinion letter. Furthermore, because a plan document failure is always deemed a significant failure, the corrective plan amendment must be adopted by no later than the last day of the second plan year following the plan year in which the failure occurred.

Operational Failures

Prior to the latest update of EPCRS, plan sponsors were limited in their ability to self-correct operational failures using a retroactive plan amendment to only a handful of specifically enumerated circumstances. Under the expanded program, self-correction can be used to correct operational failures by adopting retroactive plan amendments to conform the plan terms to the plan operations if:

  1. the amendment would result in an increase of a benefit, right, or feature;
  2. the increase is provided to all eligible employees under the plan; and
  3. the increase is permitted under the code and satisfies the general correction principles of EPCRS.

Significance of a Failure

Under EPCRS, whether a failure is deemed significant or not (a fact and circumstances determination) can impact the plan sponsors' ability to self-correct. If a failure is deemed insignificant, the IRS permits self-correction at any time. Significant failures, however, generally must be corrected no later than the end of the second plan year following the plan year in which they occurred. (As noted earlier, plan document failures are deemed significant failures.) The updated EPCRS states that the IRS will make available additional examples illustrating whether a failure is significant or not on its “Correcting Plan Errors” webpage.

More Information

For questions about the EPCRS, or any employee benefits-related matter, please contact any member of WSGR’s employee benefits and compensation practice.

John Aguirre

(650) 565-3603

Jessica Bliss

(650) 849-3470

Madeleine Boshart

(415) 947-2057

Joe Cho

(650) 496-4013

Mark Cornillez-Ty

(650) 849-3384

Brandon Gantus

(415) 947-2138

Ena Kaur

(650) 849-3335

Jamison Klang

(650) 849-3348

Michael Klippert

(650) 849-3276

Sriram Krishnamurthy

(212) 497-7721

Scott McCall

(650) 320-4547

Michael Montfort

(202) 973-8815

Matthew Norgard

(650) 849-3259

David Thomas

(650) 849-3261

Jackie Tokuda

(650) 565-3904

Michelle Wallin

(650) 565-3620

Contributors

  • John Aguirre
  • M. Madeleine Boshart
  • people
  • insights
  • about us
  • careers
  • Binder
  • Alumni
  • Mailing List Signup
  • Client FTP Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Accessibility
WSGR logo
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Instagram
Youtube
Copyright © 2026 Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati. All Rights Reserved.