WSGR logoWSGR logo
WSGR logo
  • Experience
  • People
  • Insights
  • About Us
  • Careers

  • Practice Areas
  • Industries

  • Corporate
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Patents and Innovations
  • Regulatory
  • Technology Transactions

  • Capital Markets
  • Corporate Governance
  • Corporate Life Sciences
  • Derivatives
  • Emerging Companies and Venture Capital
  • Employee Benefits and Compensation
  • Energy and Climate Solutions
  • Executive Advisory Program
  • Finance and Structured Finance
  • Fund Formation
  • Greater China
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Private Equity
  • Public Company Representation
  • Real Estate
  • Restructuring
  • Shareholder Engagement and Activism
  • Tax
  • U.S. Expansion
  • Wealthtech

  • Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs)

  • Environmental, Social, and Governance

  • AI and Data Center Infrastructure
  • Energy Regulation and Competition
  • Project Development and M&A
  • Project Finance and Tax Credit Transactions
  • Sustainability and Decarbonization
  • Transportation Electrification

  • U.S. Expansion Library and Resources

  • Post-Grant Review
  • Trademark and Advertising

  • Antitrust Litigation
  • Arbitration
  • Board and Internal Investigations
  • Class Action Litigation
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Consumer Litigation
  • Corporate Governance Litigation
  • Employment Litigation
  • Executive Branch Updates
  • Government Investigations
  • Internet Strategy and Litigation
  • Patent Litigation
  • Securities Litigation
  • State Attorneys General
  • Supreme Court and Appellate Practice
  • Trade Secret Litigation
  • Trademark and Copyright Litigation
  • Trial
  • White Collar Crime

  • Advertising, Promotions, and Marketing
  • Antitrust and Competition
  • Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. (CFIUS)
  • Communications
  • Data, Privacy, and Cybersecurity
  • Export Control and Sanctions
  • FCPA and Anti-Corruption
  • FDA Regulatory, Healthcare, and Consumer Products
  • Federal Trade Commission
  • Fintech and Financial Services
  • Government Contracts
  • National Security and Trade
  • Payments
  • State Attorneys General
  • Strategic Risk and Crisis Management
  • Tariffs, Customs, and Import Compliance

  • Antitrust and Intellectual Property
  • Antitrust Civil Enforcement
  • Antitrust Compliance and Business Strategy
  • Antitrust Criminal Enforcement
  • Antitrust Litigation
  • Antitrust Merger Clearance
  • European Competition Law
  • Third-Party Merger and Non-Merger Antitrust Representation

  • Anti-Money Laundering
  • Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence (FOCI)
  • Team Telecom

  • AI in Healthcare
  • Animal Health
  • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
  • Aviation
  • Biotech
  • Blockchain and Cryptocurrency
  • Clean Energy
  • Climate and Clean Technologies
  • Communications and Networking
  • Consumer Products and Services
  • Data Storage and Cloud
  • Defense Tech
  • Diagnostics, Life Science Tools, and Deep Tech
  • Digital Health
  • Digital Media and Entertainment
  • Electronic Gaming
  • Fintech and Financial Services
  • FoodTech and AgTech
  • Global Generics
  • Internet
  • Life Sciences
  • Medical Devices
  • Mobile Devices
  • Mobility
  • NewSpace
  • Quantum Computing
  • Semiconductors
  • Software

  • Offices
  • Country Desks
  • Events
  • Community
  • Our Diversity
  • Sustainability
  • Our Values
  • Board of Directors
  • Management Team

  • Austin
  • Boston
  • Boulder
  • Brussels
  • Century City
  • Hong Kong
  • London
  • Los Angeles
  • New York
  • Palo Alto
  • Salt Lake City
  • San Diego
  • San Francisco
  • Seattle
  • Shanghai
  • Washington, D.C.
  • Wilmington, DE

  • Law Students
  • Judicial Clerks
  • Experienced Attorneys
  • Patent Agents
  • Business Professionals
  • Alternative Legal Careers
  • Contact Recruiting
IRS Issues Interim Guidance on Capitalization and Amortization of Research and Experimental Expenditures Under Section 174 of the Code
Alerts
September 15, 2023

On September 8, 2023, the Department of Treasury (the Treasury) and the Internal Revenue Service (the IRS) released Notice 2023-63 (the Notice), which sets forth the Treasury and the IRS’s intent to issue proposed regulations addressing the application of Section 174.1 In 2017, legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act amended Section 174 to eliminate the option for taxpayers to deduct R&E expenditures and instead to require taxpayers to capitalize and amortize “specified research or experimental” (SRE) expenditures generally over five years for U.S. expenditures and 15 years for non-U.S. expenditures, for tax years beginning after December 31, 2021.

The requirement to capitalize and amortize SRE expenditures has had a significant and often surprising impact on emerging growth and technology companies in research intensive industries, causing such companies to recognize taxable income earlier, and in larger amounts, when compared to book income. In addition, the changes to Section 174 can impact the qualified small business stock (QSBS) eligibility of such companies by increasing their “gross assets,” which generally cannot exceed $50 million at the time of a stock issuance for such stock to qualify as QSBS.2

The Notice provides much needed guidance relating, among others, to the definition of SRE expenditures, the treatment of costs or expenditures incurred by a research provider by contract, the application of Section 174 in the context of a disposition, retirement, or abandonment of property or otherwise in connection with a dissolution of a corporate taxpayer, and the treatment of SRE expenditures under the Section 482 rules applicable to cost sharing arrangements. The Treasury and the IRS have requested written comments on the interim guidance by November 24, 2023. While the Notice is effective for any tax year ending after September 8, 2023, taxpayers can elect to rely on the guidance provided for tax years beginning after December 31, 2021 if the guidance is consistently applied.

Capitalization and amortization of SRE expenditures

Scope of SRE expenditures

The Notice defines SRE expenditures as (i) R&E expenditures that satisfy the requirements of Treasury Regulations Section 1.174-2 and (ii) R&E expenditures that are paid or incurred in connection with the development of computer software, even if they don’t fulfill the requirements of Treasury Regulations Section 1.174-2. The Notice provides a number of illustrative examples of SRE expenditures, including (i) labor costs (including compensation other than severance) of employees and independent contractors who perform, supervise, or directly support SRE activities, (ii) materials, supplies, and non-depreciable tools used or consumed in SRE activities, (iii) depreciation, amortization, or depletion allowances for property used in SRE activities, (iv) costs of obtaining a patent (including attorney’s fees), (v) certain operational costs relating to facilities, equipment, and assets used in performance of SRE activities; and (vi) travel costs for the performance or direct support of SRE activities. Such costs must be allocated among SRE activities on the basis of a cause-and-effect relationship between the costs and the SRE activity, although another relationship can be used if it “reasonably relates the costs to the benefits provided to the SRE activities.” In addition, the basis for allocation can differ among various types of SRE costs so long as the method for each type is applied consistently.

The Notice further clarifies that certain costs, including, among others, G&A costs that indirectly support SRE activities (e.g., salaries of payroll, HR, and accounting personnel), interest on debt taken to finance SRE activities, and costs for website hosting or to register an Internet domain name or trademark, are not to be considered as SRE expenditures.

Wilson Sonsini observation: The explicit exclusion of G&A costs is a helpful clarification in determining what costs are considered SRE expenditures.

Scope of software development

Section 174(c)(3) provides that R&E expenditures include amounts paid or incurred in connection with the development of software. The Notice provides that for this purpose, software development includes planning the development of software (including identification and documentation of requirements), designing and modelling a computer program, writing source code, revising and testing computer software, and producing the product master for software developed for sale or licensing to others. However, at the point at which software is either (i) placed in service for use by the taxpayer in its trade or business or (ii) is ready for sale or third-party licensing, software development ceases, and costs are no longer capitalized under Section 174. Further, in the case of software developed for self-use, any training, maintenance, data conversion, and installation activities are not considered software development, and accordingly any associated costs are not capitalized under Section 174. Finally, costs related to marketing, maintenance, distribution, or customer support activities performed with respect to software developed for third-party use that occurs after such software is ready for licensing or sale, are not software development costs required to be capitalized under Section 174.

Wilson Sonsini observation: Since SRE expenditures are tied to the time at which software is placed in service or is ready for license or sale, clearly documenting this point in time will be important to determine which costs are subject to capitalization under Section 174.

Scope of SRE expenditures under services agreements or other research contracts

The Notice clarifies that costs incurred by a service provider, e.g., under a services agreement or as a contractor, to perform research services with respect to an “SRE product” or develop an “SRE product” for a recipient party are not required to be capitalized under Section 174 unless either (i) the research provider has financial risk if the research fails, or (ii) the research provider has a right to use the SRE product in its trade or business or otherwise exploit the SRE product through sale, lease, or license, unless that right is subject to approval from an entity that is not related to the research provider (as specially defined). An SRE product is defined as a pilot model, process, formula, invention, technique, patent, computer software, or similar property (or a component thereof) that is subject to protection under applicable domestic or foreign law but, importantly, specifically excludes “mere know-how” gained by the service provider in the course of providing services. Accordingly, a research provider that develops and retains know-how (but does not retain an SRE product) is not required to capitalize related costs under Section 174.

Wilson Sonsini observation: This clarification provides helpful guidance to taxpayers that provide services to others under research contracts and/or services arrangements.

Treatment of unamortized SRE expenditures in the event of disposition, retirement, or abandonment of property

The Notice reaffirms the position under the existing regulations that no deduction will be allowed with respect to the capitalized SRE expenditures if the property for which such expenditures were made, is disposed of, retired, or abandoned within the amortization period. Instead, the taxpayer must continue to amortize the expenditures over the remaining amortization period.

If a corporation ceases to exist in a transaction covered under Section 381(a) of the Code (e.g., a tax-free liquidation under Section 332 or a tax-free asset reorganization under Section 368(a)), the Notice provides that the acquiror is required to continue amortizing the unamortized SRE expenditures over the remainder of the five-year amortization period. However, if the transferor corporation ceases to exist in another type of transaction (e.g., a taxable liquidation or winddown of the corporation), the corporation will be allowed to deduct the unamortized SRE expenditures in its final tax year, unless a principal purpose of the transaction is to claim a deduction for SRE expenditures.

Wilson Sonsini observation: While a corporation that sells all of its assets and liquidates in a taxable transaction can generally recover the remaining amortization deductions, a corporation that sells all its assets, including the property giving rise to the SRE expenditures, but that does not liquidate, cannot make such recovery.

Short taxable years

Under Section 174, the amortization of SRE expenditures begins from the midpoint of the tax year in which the expenditures were incurred. The Notice clarified that the midpoint of a tax year generally means the first day of the seventh month of such tax year. However, for a short tax year, the midpoint is determined by the number of months in the short tax year, and the same month will not be counted twice in successive short tax years.

Treatment of SRE expenditures under cost sharing arrangements

Certain companies may have previously entered into a “cost sharing arrangement” to allocate research and development costs between related entities. The current regulations under Section 482 provide only for the allocation of deductible costs. The Notice announced the intent to expand the scope of the Section 482 regulations to include capitalized SRE expenditures as a category of allocable costs for applicable cost sharing arrangements.

If you have any questions about the impact of R&E expenditure capitalization under Section 174 or the guidance set forth in the Notice, please contact Myra Sutanto Shen, Greg Broome, Dave Strong, Derek Wallace, Jonathan Zhu, or any member of the tax practice at Wilson Sonsini.

Anjali Krishnan contributed to the preparation of this report.


[1] All “Section” or “Treasury Regulations Section” references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code, 1986, as amended (the Code) and the Income Tax Treasury Regulations, respectively, as of September 15, 2023.

[2] For more information about QSBS, please see Wilson Sonsini Alert: “Understanding Section 1202: The Qualified Small Business Stock Exemption.”

Contributors

  • Myra A. Sutanto Shen
  • Anjali Krishnan
  • people
  • insights
  • about us
  • careers
  • Binder
  • Alumni
  • Mailing List Signup
  • Client FTP Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Accessibility
WSGR logo
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Instagram
Youtube
Copyright © 2026 Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati. All Rights Reserved.