WSGR logoWSGR logo
U.S.-China Washington Summit 2026: Key Outcomes and Unfinished Business
Alerts
October 21, 2026

Executive Summary

The U.S.-China summit (Summit) held in Washington, D.C., on September 24-26, 2026, yielded three trade-related outcomes:

  1. operationalization of the U.S.-China Board of Trade and Board of Investment;
  2. a two-month extension of the October-November 2025 trade agreement between U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (the Busan agreement) through January 10, 2027; and
  3. a reciprocal “US$30 billion for US$30 billion” tariff reduction framework for selected non-sensitive goods.

Although the Summit appears to signal a shift toward managing U.S.-China trade relations through dedicated bilateral mechanisms, the measures announced address a limited subset of the broader issues affecting U.S.-China trade relations. While the Summit focused on raw economic outcomes through relaxation of tariffs and other measures that may be deemed less sensitive from a national security perspective, many regulatory trade controls related to national security (e.g., restrictions on exports, tariffs on imports) remain firmly in place. Indeed, neither side appears to have scaled back its recent expanded use of many such controls.

In this alert, we examine the key outcomes of the Summit, a number of key national security controls that remain in place on both sides, and how those controls may continue to affect both the strategic decisions and day-to-day operations of multinational corporations.

What Came Out of the Summit?

  1. Institutionalization of Bilateral Trade Relationships

    The Summit saw the launch of several mechanisms for dialogue first agreed to, in principle, during the May 2026 Trump-Xi summit in Beijing. These include the U.S.-China Board of Trade1 and U.S.-China Board of Investment, both part of a broader effort to formally manage U.S.-China trade relations and avoid tit-for-tat trade-restrictive measures.

    • The U.S.-China Board of Trade is intended to serve as the key bilateral mechanism for facilitating bilateral trade and addressing trade-related issues between the two countries. As one of its first initiatives, the Board will oversee the implementation of the “US$30 billion for US$30 billion” reciprocal tariff reduction framework (to be further discussed below). A working group on agriculture has also been established to address agricultural market access issues. The Board will be overseen by He Lifeng, Vice Premier of the State Council, on the People’s Republic of China (PRC) side, and by Scott Bessent, U.S. Secretary of the Treasury, and Jamieson Greer, U.S. Trade Representative, on the U.S. side. Deputy-level officials and working teams are expected to meet regularly, with deputy-level meetings taking place at least quarterly.
    • The U.S.-China Board of Investment is intended to provide a structured channel through which the parties can discuss potential investment opportunities, investment-related impediments, and other commercially meaningful investment-related issues.

    Separately, the parties also agreed to establish a dedicated U.S.-China artificial intelligence (AI) dialogue and communication channel for AI-related incidents, with further discussions expected before the end of November 2026. The White House referred to this mechanism as the U.S.-China Super Intelligence Dialogue.

    Since 2025, the U.S.-China trade relationship has followed a recurring pattern of escalating tension and negotiated reprieve, with successive rounds of trade measures followed by leader-level engagements that produced temporary relief before new restrictions emerged. The creation of formal bilateral institutions and regular mechanisms for dialogue emerging from the Summit may signal a mutual intention to achieve relative stability in bilateral trade relations, at least as regards trade issues with a limited national security nexus.

  2. Extension of the Existing Trade Truce-Related Arrangements

    Another key outcome of the Summit was the preservation and extension of the Busan agreement, the initial trade truce agreed to in October-November 2025. Under the Busan agreement:

    • China agreed to suspend certain rare earth export controls, including licensing controls with extraterritorial effect on overseas-produced items containing specified PRC-origin rare earth materials at a 0.1 percent value threshold, which, if reinstated, could cause significant disruptions to the global supply chain for the production of a broad range of foreign-made magnets and related items; and
    • the U.S. agreed to suspend implementation of the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) Affiliates Rule, which was set to extend export restrictions to unlisted entities that are owned 50 percent or more by restricted parties and could have a material impact on the accessibility of items and technology subject to U.S. export controls.

    An extension of these measures by two months, from the original expiration date of November 10, 2026, through January 10, 2027, was announced. However, neither the White House nor BIS has issued an official statement or rule change confirming the extended suspension of the BIS Affiliates Rule, and some doubt exists as to whether this extension will occur.

    The Summit does little to reduce the near-term risk that companies will again face compliance and supply chain challenges associated with both the U.S. and Chinese controls. Businesses may wish to consider that risk in their long-term planning. Uncertainty remains regarding the scope of the trade relief, and businesses may wish to continue to monitor implementing measures and official guidance as further details emerge.

  3. Tariff Reduction for Non-Sensitive Goods

    The framework for reciprocal tariff reduction represents the latest step in the gradual unwinding of the tariff measures introduced in April 2025, when the U.S. and China each imposed reciprocal and retaliatory tariffs of up to 125 percent. Subsequent negotiations in Geneva and Busan resulted in significant tariff reductions and a series of tariff suspension arrangements. The Summit builds upon this broader process of tariff de-escalation that has been underway since May 2025.

    Under the framework, which will be implemented through the newly established U.S.-China Board of Trade, each side has agreed in principle to provide more favorable tariff treatment for approximately US$30 billion in imports. The framework is primarily focused on non-sensitive goods. Covered U.S. exports include agricultural goods, fish and seafood, logs and wood products, cosmetics, and medical devices, while covered Chinese exports include consumer products such as small appliances, toys, holiday decorations, and children’s car seats. The framework contemplates tariff treatment as set forth in the parties’ respective World Trade Organization (WTO) schedules for more than 90 percent of the affected products, resulting in a return to the application of standard (i.e., WTO-bound) duty rates to included imports. A return to WTO-bound rates could be a significant development.

    The framework suggests that both governments continue to view bilateral trade as economically important and are willing to pursue selective tariff reductions where mutual commercial interests align. Rather than pursuing broad-based tariff liberalization, both countries appear to be interested in adopting a more targeted approach focused on specific product categories that are generally regarded as non-sensitive from a national security perspective. This approach omits out-of-scope items and technology that are at the center of the U.S.-China trade dispute.

What Is Kept Outside the Talks?

Despite the attempts to stabilize the two countries’ trade relationship, many trade controls viewed as matters of national security remain firmly outside the scope of the current U.S.-China trade discussions. Among those untouched controls are the following:

  1. PRC Export Controls Remain Largely Intact

    The rare earth-related export control measures suspended by the trade truce represent a limited subset of China’s broader export controls on critical raw materials that are important to the manufacture of semiconductors, electronics, electric vehicles, defense products, and other advanced technology applications. The only reference in the White House announcement is a brief statement that the parties “continue to work on U.S. concerns regarding supply chain shortages related to rare earths and other critical minerals, with the goal of ensuring shipment levels return to appropriate levels.” By contrast, the PRC announcements (see here and here) contain no reference to rare earth export controls or licensing requirements. The availability of, and the time required to obtain, export licenses are likely to continue to be a source of supply chain uncertainty and disruption. PRC export controls on rare earths are likely to continue to feature prominently in future rounds of bilateral negotiations.

  2. PRC’s National Security Framework Continues to Expand

    In recent years, China has continued to expand and deploy national security measures across a range of areas. Recent developments include:

    China has also imposed targeted sanctions and other restrictive measures on U.S. companies. While trade tensions may be easing in selected areas such as tariffs, which are economic in nature, China’s broader national security toolkit continues to expand and remains an important feature of the regulatory landscape.

  3. U.S. Export Controls on Advanced Technologies Remain Outside the Talks

    Over the past several years, the U.S. has taken measures to limit China’s access to technologies for national security reasons by expanding export controls, particularly in relation to advanced semiconductors, advanced computing, and AI technologies. Following the Summit, Jamieson Greer, the U.S. trade representative, indicated that discussions concerning certain advanced U.S. semiconductors, which he described as being the “crown jewels” of U.S. technology, remained outside the scope of the negotiations.3

  4. Continued Use of Restricted Party Lists for Chinese Companies

    In addition to export controls, the U.S. continues to add Chinese companies to restricted party lists such as the BIS’s Entity List (the Entity List), the Office of Foreign Assets Control’s Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List, the U.S. Department of Defense’s 1260H List (the 1260H List), and the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act Entity List (the UFLPA List). Recent examples include:

    • The June 2026 addition of several Chinese companies to the 1260H List. The 1260H List consists of companies alleged to be “Chinese military companies” operating, directly or indirectly, in the U.S. The continued use of this list underscores the U.S. government’s focus on identifying entities it considers to be associated with or supporting the Chinese military and may have implications under other U.S. national security frameworks, including the BIOSECURE Act.
    • The July 2026 addition of 43 China-based companies to the UFLPA List based on forced labor concerns.
    • Continued additions of Chinese companies to the Entity List. Such designations continue to form an important part of U.S. export control policy and may affect the ability of designated entities to access U.S.-controlled goods, software, and technology.

    These developments illustrate a broader U.S. trend toward using entity-specific restrictions to address China-related concerns. Although directed at specific companies, continuing additions across multiple lists point to a broader and sustained effort to address national security, foreign policy, and related concerns through targeted restrictions. Chinese companies are likely to continue to face increasingly complex trade-related restrictions even as broader trade relations stabilize and selected tariff barriers are reduced.

  5. Spillover Effects of Russia- and Iran-Related Sanctions on China

    Shortly before the Summit, President Trump signed into law the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026 (Act). Among other measures, the Act mandates the imposition of sanctions on foreign persons and vessels engaged in specified Russia-related activities, authorizes sanctions against foreign persons involved in facilitating Russian sanctions evasion, and imposes tariffs of up to 100 percent on major purchasers of Russian oil and natural gas. Given China’s position as one of the largest purchasers of Russian energy exports, these measures may have implications for Chinese companies and other market participants with exposure to Russia-related trade and supply chains and may also serve as additional policy tools with respect to China.

  6. Other U.S. National Security Measures with a Likely Impact on China Continue to Evolve

    In addition to export controls, sanctions, and designation-based restrictions, the U.S. has continued to develop a broader range of national security measures affecting China-related business activities. These measures extend beyond traditional trade controls and increasingly target areas such as biotechnology, data security, and supply chain resilience, as well as imposing inbound and outbound foreign investment controls. Notable developments include:

    • BIOSECURE Act: The BIOSECURE Act, signed into law on December 18, 2025, imposes restrictions on certain U.S. government procurement and contracting relationships involving a “biotechnology company of concern.” Such companies may include entities appearing on the 1260H List or other entities meeting specified statutory criteria, including entities acting on behalf of, or subject to the direction or control of, a foreign adversary government, including the PRC government.
    • Department of Justice (DOJ) Data Security Program: The DOJ’s Data Security Program, which went into effect on April 8, 2025, establishes restrictions to prevent foreign adversaries, which include China, from accessing U.S. government-related data and Americans’ bulk sensitive personal data, addressing national security risks associated with espionage, surveillance, AI development, and other activities.
    • Outbound foreign investment controls—COINS Act: The Comprehensive Outbound Investment National Security Act of 2025 (COINS Act) provides a statutory basis for the existing U.S. Outbound Investment Security Program and requires the U.S. Department of the Treasury to expand the regime through new regulations expected by early 2027. Among other changes, the COINS Act expands the categories of covered technologies, broadens the definition of covered foreign persons, and contemplates additional restrictions on U.S. capital flows into China and other countries of concern.4 
    • Inbound foreign investment controls—CFIUS: The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), a regulatory regime that may apply to any non-U.S. investor, continues to subject transactions involving Chinese investors to heightened scrutiny, particularly where U.S. critical technologies, critical infrastructure, or sensitive personal data are implicated. CFIUS is developing a “Known Investor Program” to facilitate fast-track U.S. allied investments into the U.S. This may further limit both PRC investors’ direct investments in the U.S. and PRC companies’ indirect commercial relationships with parties seeking to participate in the program, as a proposed eligibility criterion requires an applicant to demonstrate “verifiable distance from adversary countries,” which include China.

What Should Businesses Expect Going Forward?

Short-Term Stabilization, Continuing Strategic Constraints

The Summit extended the existing trade truce and created a pathway for further tariff reductions. These developments reduce the immediate risk of renewed tariff escalation and provide limited additional certainty for businesses engaged in bilateral trade.

At the same time, the measures covered by the Summit represent only a relatively narrow subset of the broader range of restrictions that now govern U.S.-China trade relations. While the parties have agreed to establish institutionalized mechanisms such as the U.S.-China Board of Trade and the U.S.-China Board of Investment, the measures announced at the Summit did not address export controls, designation-based restrictions, sanctions, investment restrictions, or other national security tools that continue to shape the regulatory environment in which businesses operate.

The latest developments are therefore perhaps best understood as a short-term effort to manage trade tensions and achieve mutually beneficial economic outcomes, rather than a broader normalization of bilateral economic relations.

National Security Considerations Increasingly Shape the Business Environment

While the Summit may reduce certain trade-related friction, businesses increasingly need to navigate a broader range of measures, including export controls, sanctions and countersanctions regimes, investment screening, supply chain due diligence requirements, outbound investment restrictions, and other national security measures imposed by both governments. National security considerations will continue to influence an expanding range of commercial activities, including trade, foreign investment, technology transfers, supply chains, data flows, and procurement decisions. Businesses may therefore find that planning, compliance, and risk management considerations become increasingly multidisciplinary, and may wish to prepare for a continued increase in the number and complexity of national security-related measures affecting cross-border U.S.-China activities.

For more information, please contact Jocelyn Chow, Joshua Gruenspecht, Ted Posner, Anne Seymour, Grace Chow, Kevin Chan, or any member of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati’s National Security and Trade practice.

[1]  Press Release, The White House, “U.S.-China Board of Trade” (September 27, 2026), https://www.whitehouse.gov/releases/2026/09/u-s-china-board-of-trade/.

[2]  Please see our previous client alert China’s Enhanced National Security “Great Wall”– Supply Chain Security, Red Lines, and Blocking Rules on the Provisions of the State Council on the Security of Industrial and Supply Chains (国务院关于产业链供应链安全的规定), the PRC Regulation on Counteracting Unjustified Extraterritorial Application Imposed by Foreign States (中华人民共和国反外国不当域外管辖条例), and the deployment of blocking orders under China’s broader national security framework.

[3]  Sarah Chan, “US China Trade Talks Details Expected Monday from Greer,” The Hong Kong News (September 25, 2026), https://www.thehk.news/news/politics/us-china-trade-talks-details-expected-monday-from-greer.

[4]  Please see our previous client alert The COINS Act: Outbound Investment Security Re-Programmed.

Contributors

WSGR logo
Copyright © 2026 Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati. All Rights Reserved.