WSGR logoWSGR logo
WSGR logo
  • Experience
  • People
  • Insights
  • About Us
  • Careers

  • Practice Areas
  • Industries

  • Corporate
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Patents and Innovations
  • Regulatory
  • Technology Transactions

  • Capital Markets
  • Corporate Governance
  • Corporate Life Sciences
  • Derivatives
  • Emerging Companies and Venture Capital
  • Employee Benefits and Compensation
  • Energy and Climate Solutions
  • Executive Advisory Program
  • Finance and Structured Finance
  • Fund Formation
  • Greater China
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Private Equity
  • Public Company Representation
  • Real Estate
  • Restructuring
  • Shareholder Engagement and Activism
  • Tax
  • U.S. Expansion
  • Wealthtech

  • Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs)

  • Environmental, Social, and Governance

  • AI and Data Center Infrastructure
  • Energy Regulation and Competition
  • Project Development and M&A
  • Project Finance and Tax Credit Transactions
  • Sustainability and Decarbonization
  • Transportation Electrification

  • U.S. Expansion Library and Resources

  • Post-Grant Review
  • Trademark and Advertising

  • Antitrust Litigation
  • Arbitration
  • Board and Internal Investigations
  • Class Action Litigation
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Consumer Litigation
  • Corporate Governance Litigation
  • Employment Litigation
  • Executive Branch Updates
  • Government Investigations
  • Internet Strategy and Litigation
  • Patent Litigation
  • Securities Litigation
  • State Attorneys General
  • Supreme Court and Appellate Practice
  • Trade Secret Litigation
  • Trademark and Copyright Litigation
  • Trial
  • White Collar Crime

  • Advertising, Promotions, and Marketing
  • Antitrust and Competition
  • Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. (CFIUS)
  • Communications
  • Data, Privacy, and Cybersecurity
  • Export Control and Sanctions
  • FCPA and Anti-Corruption
  • FDA Regulatory, Healthcare, and Consumer Products
  • Federal Trade Commission
  • Fintech and Financial Services
  • Government Contracts
  • National Security and Trade
  • Payments
  • State Attorneys General
  • Strategic Risk and Crisis Management
  • Tariffs, Customs, and Import Compliance

  • Antitrust and Intellectual Property
  • Antitrust Civil Enforcement
  • Antitrust Compliance and Business Strategy
  • Antitrust Criminal Enforcement
  • Antitrust Litigation
  • Antitrust Merger Clearance
  • European Competition Law
  • Third-Party Merger and Non-Merger Antitrust Representation

  • Anti-Money Laundering
  • Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence (FOCI)
  • Team Telecom

  • AI in Healthcare
  • Animal Health
  • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
  • Aviation
  • Biotech
  • Blockchain and Cryptocurrency
  • Clean Energy
  • Climate and Clean Technologies
  • Communications and Networking
  • Consumer Products and Services
  • Data Storage and Cloud
  • Defense Tech
  • Diagnostics, Life Science Tools, and Deep Tech
  • Digital Health
  • Digital Media and Entertainment
  • Electronic Gaming
  • Fintech and Financial Services
  • FoodTech and AgTech
  • Global Generics
  • Internet
  • Life Sciences
  • Medical Devices
  • Mobile Devices
  • Mobility
  • NewSpace
  • Quantum Computing
  • Semiconductors
  • Software

  • Offices
  • Country Desks
  • Events
  • Community
  • Our Diversity
  • Sustainability
  • Our Values
  • Board of Directors
  • Management Team

  • Austin
  • Boston
  • Boulder
  • Brussels
  • Century City
  • Hong Kong
  • London
  • Los Angeles
  • New York
  • Palo Alto
  • Salt Lake City
  • San Diego
  • San Francisco
  • Seattle
  • Shanghai
  • Washington, D.C.
  • Wilmington, DE

  • Law Students
  • Judicial Clerks
  • Experienced Attorneys
  • Patent Agents
  • Business Professionals
  • Alternative Legal Careers
  • Contact Recruiting
The Ninth Circuit Stays Enforcement of SB 261
Alerts
November 19, 2025

Key Takeaways

  • SB 261, California’s Climate-Related Financial Risk Act, requires public and private companies with over $500 million in total annual revenue that do business in California to publish a climate-related financial risk report by January 1, 2026, and every two years thereafter, detailing their climate-related financial risks and efforts to reduce and adapt to such risks.
  • On November 18, 2025, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals stayed enforcement of SB 261 while it reviews an appeal to the ongoing litigation challenging SB 261, and SB 253, California’s Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act.
  • Given the uncertainty with respect to when and how the Ninth Circuit will rule, it is prudent for in-scope companies to be prepared to comply with the requirements of SB 261 by the original deadline of January 1, 2026.

On November 18, 2025, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (the Court) granted an injunction that stays enforcement of SB 261 while the Court reviews an appeal related to the ongoing litigation challenging SB 261 and SB 253 on First Amendment grounds. SB 261 requires public and private companies with greater than $500 million in total annual revenue that do business in California to prepare a climate-related financial risk report by January 1, 2026, and every two years thereafter, detailing their climate-related financial risks and efforts to reduce and adapt to such risks. You can find our prior client alerts related to preparation for SB 261 here and here.

The appeal concerns the lower court’s denial of a request for a preliminary injunction against SB 261 and SB 253. Oral arguments on the appeal are currently scheduled for January 9, 2026, but the Court has the ability to determine the case ahead of this date based on the briefing, which is complete. The Court could also hear oral arguments and not issue an order until some unknown later date, extending the duration of the injunction. Given the uncertainty with respect to when and how the Court will rule, it is prudent for in-scope companies to be prepared to comply with the requirements of SB 261 by the original deadline of January 1, 2026. While companies should be prepared to comply by the original deadline, companies need not post anything to their websites or submit anything to the California Air Resources Board (CARB) pending a decision on the appeal.

Additionally, the Court did not grant an injunction related to SB 253, which requires public and private companies with greater than $1 billion in revenue that do business in California to disclose their emissions. As such, in-scope companies should continue preparing for SB 253. CARB has not finalized a compliance deadline for SB 253, but has indicated that it will be in the second half of 2026, and the proposed deadline is August 10, 2026.

For more information on this topic or any related matter, please contact any member of the firm’s Sustainability and ESG Advisory, Corporate, or Litigation practices.

Contributors

  • Amanda N. Urquiza
  • Richard C. Blake
  • Stephen B. Strain
  • Mark R. Yohalem
  • Lisa L. Stimmell
  • people
  • insights
  • about us
  • careers
  • Binder
  • Alumni
  • Mailing List Signup
  • Client FTP Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Accessibility
WSGR logo
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Instagram
Youtube
Copyright © 2026 Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati. All Rights Reserved.