WSGR logoWSGR logo
WSGR logo
  • Experience
  • People
  • Insights
  • About Us
  • Careers

  • Practice Areas
  • Industries

  • Corporate
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Patents and Innovations
  • Regulatory
  • Technology Transactions

  • Capital Markets
  • Corporate Governance
  • Corporate Life Sciences
  • Derivatives
  • Emerging Companies and Venture Capital
  • Employee Benefits and Compensation
  • Energy and Climate Solutions
  • Executive Advisory Program
  • Finance and Structured Finance
  • Fund Formation
  • Greater China
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Private Equity
  • Public Company Representation
  • Real Estate
  • Restructuring
  • Shareholder Engagement and Activism
  • Tax
  • U.S. Expansion
  • Wealthtech

  • Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs)

  • Environmental, Social, and Governance

  • AI and Data Center Infrastructure
  • Energy Regulation and Competition
  • Project Development and M&A
  • Project Finance and Tax Credit Transactions
  • Sustainability and Decarbonization
  • Transportation Electrification

  • U.S. Expansion Library and Resources

  • Post-Grant Review
  • Trademark and Advertising

  • Antitrust Litigation
  • Arbitration
  • Board and Internal Investigations
  • Class Action Litigation
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Consumer Litigation
  • Corporate Governance Litigation
  • Employment Litigation
  • Executive Branch Updates
  • Government Investigations
  • Internet Strategy and Litigation
  • Patent Litigation
  • Securities Litigation
  • State Attorneys General
  • Supreme Court and Appellate Practice
  • Trade Secret Litigation
  • Trademark and Copyright Litigation
  • Trial
  • White Collar Crime

  • Advertising, Promotions, and Marketing
  • Antitrust and Competition
  • Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. (CFIUS)
  • Communications
  • Data, Privacy, and Cybersecurity
  • Export Control and Sanctions
  • FCPA and Anti-Corruption
  • FDA Regulatory, Healthcare, and Consumer Products
  • Federal Trade Commission
  • Fintech and Financial Services
  • Government Contracts
  • National Security and Trade
  • Payments
  • State Attorneys General
  • Strategic Risk and Crisis Management
  • Tariffs, Customs, and Import Compliance

  • Antitrust and Intellectual Property
  • Antitrust Civil Enforcement
  • Antitrust Compliance and Business Strategy
  • Antitrust Criminal Enforcement
  • Antitrust Litigation
  • Antitrust Merger Clearance
  • European Competition Law
  • Third-Party Merger and Non-Merger Antitrust Representation

  • Anti-Money Laundering
  • Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence (FOCI)
  • Team Telecom

  • AI in Healthcare
  • Animal Health
  • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
  • Aviation
  • Biotech
  • Blockchain and Cryptocurrency
  • Clean Energy
  • Climate and Clean Technologies
  • Communications and Networking
  • Consumer Products and Services
  • Data Storage and Cloud
  • Defense Tech
  • Diagnostics, Life Science Tools, and Deep Tech
  • Digital Health
  • Digital Media and Entertainment
  • Electronic Gaming
  • Fintech and Financial Services
  • FoodTech and AgTech
  • Global Generics
  • Internet
  • Life Sciences
  • Medical Devices
  • Mobile Devices
  • Mobility
  • NewSpace
  • Quantum Computing
  • Semiconductors
  • Software

  • Offices
  • Country Desks
  • Events
  • Pro Bono
  • Community
  • Our Diversity
  • Sustainability
  • Our Values
  • Board of Directors
  • Management Team

  • Austin
  • Boston
  • Boulder
  • Brussels
  • Century City
  • Hong Kong
  • London
  • Los Angeles
  • New York
  • Palo Alto
  • Salt Lake City
  • San Diego
  • San Francisco
  • Seattle
  • Shanghai
  • Washington, D.C.
  • Wilmington, DE

  • Law Students
  • Judicial Clerks
  • Experienced Attorneys
  • Patent Agents
  • Business Professionals
  • Alternative Legal Careers
  • Contact Recruiting
IRS May Relax Collection of Income Prong of Section 355 Active Trade or Business Test for R&D Companies
Alerts
September 27, 2018

On September 25, 2018, the Internal Revenue Service (the IRS) released a statement announcing a study of the "active trade or business" test for tax-free spin-offs under Section 355 (the ATB Test), as applied to entrepreneurial ventures whose activities consist of lengthy phases of research and development.1Importantly, the IRS also indicated that, pending completion of the study, it would entertain requests for private letter rulings from such ventures regarding qualification for the ATB Test. This announcement has potentially significant implications for pre-revenue technology companies that have not previously been able to rely on Section 355.

Section 355 and the ATB Test. Section 355 generally allows a corporation to distribute stock or securities of a controlled subsidiary to its stockholders or security holders on a tax-free basis, provided that a number of requirements, including the ATB Test, are met. Where Section 355 does not apply, a spin-off of a subsidiary may, subject to the availability of net operating losses or other tax attributes, be fully taxable to both the corporation and the stockholders receiving a distribution of stock.

The ATB Test generally requires that, for the five years preceding the spin-off, the distributing corporation and the controlled corporation each are engaged in the active conduct of a trade or business, which "ordinarily must include the collection of income and payment of expenses."2In order to satisfy the ATB Test, each business generally has been required to have revenues throughout the five-year period, except in extraordinary circumstances (for example, when failure to generate revenues in a taxable year was caused by events outside of the corporation's control).3The inability to meet the ATB Test has prevented certain otherwise active technology companies from engaging in tax-free spin-offs because such companies have long lead times to revenue, and in some cases, such as biotech and medical device companies, must navigate complex regulatory processes before revenue is achieved.

The Release. The IRS acknowledged that many entrepreneurial ventures engage in extended periods of research and development, during which they collect little or no income but "nonetheless incur significant financial expenditures and perform day-to-day operational and managerial functions that historically have evidenced 'active' business." In light of the significant rise in these entrepreneurial ventures, the IRS and the Treasury Department are considering guidance regarding whether a business can satisfy the ATB Test if "entrepreneurial activities, as opposed to investment or other non-business activities, take place with the purpose of earning income in the future, but no income has yet been collected." Relaxation of the ATB Test in these situations could greatly benefit technology companies contemplating spin-offs, but that are unable to meet the ATB Test under current law.

Pending completion of the IRS study of the issue, the IRS indicated that it will entertain requests for private letter rulings regarding satisfaction of the ATB Test by corporations that have not collected income, which may indicate that the IRS is inclined to liberalize the ATB Test in a manner that would be beneficial to earlier stage technology companies.

For further information, please contact Greg Broome (gbroome@wsgr.com, 415-947-2139); Myra Sutanto Shen (msutantoshen@wsgr.com, 650-565-3815); Jonathan Zhu (jzhu@wsgr.com, 650-849-3388); or any member of the tax practice at Wilson Sonsini.


1All Section references herein are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code).
2Treas. Reg. § 1.355-3(b)(2)(ii); Rev. Rul. 57-492, 1957-2 C.B. 247.
3See, for example, Rev. Rul. 57-126, 1957-1 C.B. 123; Rev. Rul. 82-219, 1982-2 C.B. 82.

Contributors

  • Myra A. Sutanto Shen
  • people
  • insights
  • about us
  • careers
  • Binder
  • Alumni
  • Mailing List Signup
  • Client FTP Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Accessibility
WSGR logo
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Instagram
Youtube
Copyright © 2026 Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati. All Rights Reserved.