WSGR logoWSGR logo
WSGR logo
  • Experience
  • People
  • Insights
  • About Us
  • Careers

  • Practice Areas
  • Industries

  • Corporate
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Patents and Innovations
  • Regulatory
  • Technology Transactions

  • Capital Markets
  • Corporate Governance
  • Corporate Life Sciences
  • Derivatives
  • Emerging Companies and Venture Capital
  • Employee Benefits and Compensation
  • Energy and Climate Solutions
  • Executive Advisory Program
  • Finance and Structured Finance
  • Fund Formation
  • Greater China
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Private Equity
  • Public Company Representation
  • Real Estate
  • Restructuring
  • Shareholder Engagement and Activism
  • Tax
  • U.S. Expansion
  • Wealthtech

  • Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs)

  • Environmental, Social, and Governance

  • AI and Data Center Infrastructure
  • Energy Regulation and Competition
  • Project Development and M&A
  • Project Finance and Tax Credit Transactions
  • Sustainability and Decarbonization
  • Transportation Electrification

  • U.S. Expansion Library and Resources

  • Post-Grant Review
  • Trademark and Advertising

  • Antitrust Litigation
  • Arbitration
  • Board and Internal Investigations
  • Class Action Litigation
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Consumer Litigation
  • Corporate Governance Litigation
  • Employment Litigation
  • Executive Branch Updates
  • Government Investigations
  • Internet Strategy and Litigation
  • Patent Litigation
  • Securities Litigation
  • State Attorneys General
  • Supreme Court and Appellate Practice
  • Trade Secret Litigation
  • Trademark and Copyright Litigation
  • Trial
  • White Collar Crime

  • Advertising, Promotions, and Marketing
  • Antitrust and Competition
  • Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. (CFIUS)
  • Communications
  • Data, Privacy, and Cybersecurity
  • Export Control and Sanctions
  • FCPA and Anti-Corruption
  • FDA Regulatory, Healthcare, and Consumer Products
  • Federal Trade Commission
  • Fintech and Financial Services
  • Government Contracts
  • National Security and Trade
  • Payments
  • State Attorneys General
  • Strategic Risk and Crisis Management
  • Tariffs, Customs, and Import Compliance

  • Antitrust and Intellectual Property
  • Antitrust Civil Enforcement
  • Antitrust Compliance and Business Strategy
  • Antitrust Criminal Enforcement
  • Antitrust Litigation
  • Antitrust Merger Clearance
  • European Competition Law
  • Third-Party Merger and Non-Merger Antitrust Representation

  • Anti-Money Laundering
  • Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence (FOCI)
  • Team Telecom

  • AI in Healthcare
  • Animal Health
  • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
  • Aviation
  • Biotech
  • Blockchain and Cryptocurrency
  • Clean Energy
  • Climate and Clean Technologies
  • Communications and Networking
  • Consumer Products and Services
  • Data Storage and Cloud
  • Defense Tech
  • Diagnostics, Life Science Tools, and Deep Tech
  • Digital Health
  • Digital Media and Entertainment
  • Electronic Gaming
  • Fintech and Financial Services
  • FoodTech and AgTech
  • Global Generics
  • Internet
  • Life Sciences
  • Medical Devices
  • Mobile Devices
  • Mobility
  • NewSpace
  • Quantum Computing
  • Semiconductors
  • Software

  • Offices
  • Country Desks
  • Events
  • Community
  • Our Diversity
  • Sustainability
  • Our Values
  • Board of Directors
  • Management Team

  • Austin
  • Boston
  • Boulder
  • Brussels
  • Century City
  • Hong Kong
  • London
  • Los Angeles
  • New York
  • Palo Alto
  • Salt Lake City
  • San Diego
  • San Francisco
  • Seattle
  • Shanghai
  • Washington, D.C.
  • Wilmington, DE

  • Law Students
  • Judicial Clerks
  • Experienced Attorneys
  • Patent Agents
  • Business Professionals
  • Alternative Legal Careers
  • Contact Recruiting
Insights
Type
People
Practices
Industries
From Date
To Date
Reset Search

Search Results

Client Highlights

5.11.26

Wilson Sonsini Advises Odyssey Therapeutics on Patent Matters Related to IPO
On May 7, 2026, Odyssey Therapeutics, a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company seeking to transform the standard of care for patients suffering from autoimmune and inflammatory diseases by developing medicines that are designed to precisely target disease pathology, announced the pricing of its upsized initial public offering of 15,500,000 shares of its common stock at an initial public offering price of $18.00 per share. In addition, Odyssey has granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 2,325,000 shares of common stock at the initial public offering price, less underwriting discounts and commissions. Odyssey’s common stock began trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market on May 8, 2026, under the ticker symbol “ODTX.” The offering closed on May 11, 2026. Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati advised Odyssey on patent matters related to the transaction.
Alerts

5.07.26

Federal Circuit Provides Path to Written Description and Enablement for Patents Related to Methods of Using a Well-Known Class of Molecules
On April 16, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (the court) issued a precedential decision in Teva Pharmaceuticals International GmbH v. Eli Lily and Company, determining that the claims of Teva’s U.S. Patent Nos. 8,586,045 (the ’045 patent), 9,884,907 (the ’907 patent), and 9,884,908 (the ’908 patent) (collectively, the Headache Patents) relating to methods of reducing headache by administration of humanized anti-CGRP antagonist antibodies are not invalid for lack of written description or enablement. The decision reversed a district court’s judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) decision concluding otherwise, and reinstated the jury’s findings that Eli Lilly’s Emgality® product willfully infringed the Headache Patents.
Alerts

3.12.26

USPTO Appeals Review Panel Addresses Obviousness-Type Double Patenting
USPTO convenes an Appeals Review Panel and authorizes amicus briefing to consider the basis for rejecting a patent application under the doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting.
Alerts

12.10.25

Failure to Provide Correct Inventors to the USPTO Results in Unenforceable Patents
Executive Summary
Alerts

11.13.25

FDA Moves to Streamline Biosimilar Development: Implications for Regulatory Strategy and Clinical Study Design
Executive Summary
News Articles

10.01.25

LMG Life Sciences Recognizes Wilson Sonsini, Attorneys in 2025 Guide
On September 30, 2025, LMG Life Sciences announced the 2025 edition of its guide, which identifies and ranks the leading law firms and individuals in the life sciences industry across the United States. The rankings are the result of firm participation in questionnaires, partner interviews to gather market feedback, client surveys, and independent research. LMG Life Sciences has conducted research and published rankings since 2012. This year, six Wilson Sonsini practices and 18 attorneys have been recognized in the guide.
Alerts

9.26.25

FDA’s Release of Complete Response Letters Raises Questions Related to Intellectual Property
Executive Summary
Alerts

9.26.25

Federal Circuit Issues First Precedent on AIA Derivation Proceedings Regarding Global Health Solutions v. Selner
Executive Summary
News Articles

9.04.25

Derrick Rowe Honored Among The National Law Journal’s 2025 D.C. Rising Stars
On September 4, 2025, Wilson Sonsini partner Derrick Rowe was selected among the honorees for “D.C. Rising Stars” during The National Law Journal Legal Awards, which highlight the top work in Washington, D.C. This year’s honorees have wielded influence in their practice areas in the D.C. area and beyond. All of the honorees and finalists will be celebrated at an awards dinner in D.C. on November 5.
Alerts

9.04.25

Inventor’s Failure to Provide Material Information to the USPTO Results in an Unenforceable Patent
On August 20, 2025, the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware (court) found inequitable conduct when Applicant, Lindis Biotech, GMBH (Lindis), relied on data from hastily performed experiments to obtain a patent from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), while withholding from the USPTO more thorough contradictory data.
Alerts

8.14.25

Department of Commerce Initiates Bayh-Dole Compliance Review and Asserts March-In Proceeding Targeting Harvard University Patents
Executive Summary
Alerts

5.01.25

Method of Treatment Claim’s Limiting Preamble Must Satisfy the Written Description Requirement
On March 13, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in the case of In Re: Xencor, Inc.1 In this Appeal from the Appeals Review Panel of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (ARP), with regard to U.S. Application No. 16/803,690 (’690 application), the court held that the preamble of the method of treatment claims at issue is limiting, and thus requires sufficient written description under 35 U.S.C. §112.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • people
  • insights
  • about us
  • careers
  • Binder
  • Alumni
  • Mailing List Signup
  • Client FTP Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Accessibility
WSGR logo
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Instagram
Youtube
Copyright © 2026 Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati. All Rights Reserved.