WSGR logoWSGR logo
WSGR logo
  • Experience
  • People
  • Insights
  • About Us
  • Careers

  • Practice Areas
  • Industries

  • Corporate
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Patents and Innovations
  • Regulatory
  • Technology Transactions

  • Capital Markets
  • Corporate Governance
  • Corporate Life Sciences
  • Derivatives
  • Emerging Companies and Venture Capital
  • Employee Benefits and Compensation
  • Energy and Climate Solutions
  • Executive Advisory Program
  • Finance and Structured Finance
  • Fund Formation
  • Greater China
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Private Equity
  • Public Company Representation
  • Real Estate
  • Restructuring
  • Shareholder Engagement and Activism
  • Tax
  • U.S. Expansion
  • Wealthtech

  • Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs)

  • Environmental, Social, and Governance

  • AI and Data Center Infrastructure
  • Energy Regulation and Competition
  • Project Development and M&A
  • Project Finance and Tax Credit Transactions
  • Sustainability and Decarbonization
  • Transportation Electrification

  • U.S. Expansion Library and Resources

  • Post-Grant Review
  • Trademark and Advertising

  • Antitrust Litigation
  • Arbitration
  • Board and Internal Investigations
  • Class Action Litigation
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Consumer Litigation
  • Corporate Governance Litigation
  • Employment Litigation
  • Executive Branch Updates
  • Government Investigations
  • Internet Strategy and Litigation
  • Patent Litigation
  • Securities Litigation
  • State Attorneys General
  • Supreme Court and Appellate Practice
  • Trade Secret Litigation
  • Trademark and Copyright Litigation
  • Trial
  • White Collar Crime

  • Advertising, Promotions, and Marketing
  • Antitrust and Competition
  • Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. (CFIUS)
  • Communications
  • Data, Privacy, and Cybersecurity
  • Export Control and Sanctions
  • FCPA and Anti-Corruption
  • FDA Regulatory, Healthcare, and Consumer Products
  • Federal Trade Commission
  • Fintech and Financial Services
  • Government Contracts
  • National Security and Trade
  • Payments
  • State Attorneys General
  • Strategic Risk and Crisis Management
  • Tariffs, Customs, and Import Compliance

  • Antitrust and Intellectual Property
  • Antitrust Civil Enforcement
  • Antitrust Compliance and Business Strategy
  • Antitrust Criminal Enforcement
  • Antitrust Litigation
  • Antitrust Merger Clearance
  • European Competition Law
  • Third-Party Merger and Non-Merger Antitrust Representation

  • Anti-Money Laundering
  • Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence (FOCI)
  • Team Telecom

  • AI in Healthcare
  • Animal Health
  • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
  • Aviation
  • Biotech
  • Blockchain and Cryptocurrency
  • Clean Energy
  • Climate and Clean Technologies
  • Communications and Networking
  • Consumer Products and Services
  • Data Storage and Cloud
  • Defense Tech
  • Diagnostics, Life Science Tools, and Deep Tech
  • Digital Health
  • Digital Media and Entertainment
  • Electronic Gaming
  • Fintech and Financial Services
  • FoodTech and AgTech
  • Global Generics
  • Internet
  • Life Sciences
  • Medical Devices
  • Mobile Devices
  • Mobility
  • NewSpace
  • Quantum Computing
  • Semiconductors
  • Software

  • Offices
  • Country Desks
  • Events
  • Community
  • Our Diversity
  • Sustainability
  • Our Values
  • Board of Directors
  • Management Team

  • Austin
  • Boston
  • Boulder
  • Brussels
  • Century City
  • Hong Kong
  • London
  • Los Angeles
  • New York
  • Palo Alto
  • Salt Lake City
  • San Diego
  • San Francisco
  • Seattle
  • Shanghai
  • Washington, D.C.
  • Wilmington, DE

  • Law Students
  • Judicial Clerks
  • Experienced Attorneys
  • Patent Agents
  • Business Professionals
  • Alternative Legal Careers
  • Contact Recruiting
Insights
Type
People
Practices
Industries
From Date
To Date
Reset Search

Search Results

Alerts

5.07.26

Federal Circuit Provides Path to Written Description and Enablement for Patents Related to Methods of Using a Well-Known Class of Molecules
On April 16, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (the court) issued a precedential decision in Teva Pharmaceuticals International GmbH v. Eli Lily and Company, determining that the claims of Teva’s U.S. Patent Nos. 8,586,045 (the ’045 patent), 9,884,907 (the ’907 patent), and 9,884,908 (the ’908 patent) (collectively, the Headache Patents) relating to methods of reducing headache by administration of humanized anti-CGRP antagonist antibodies are not invalid for lack of written description or enablement. The decision reversed a district court’s judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) decision concluding otherwise, and reinstated the jury’s findings that Eli Lilly’s Emgality® product willfully infringed the Headache Patents.
Client Highlights

4.08.26

Wilson Sonsini Advises Sidewinder Therapeutics on Oversubscribed $137 Million Series B Financing
On April 8, 2026, Sidewinder Therapeutics, a biopharmaceutical company pioneering the development of next-generation bispecific antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) for the treatment of cancer, announced the closing of an oversubscribed $137 million Series B financing. The round was co-led by Frazier Life Sciences and Novartis Venture Fund, with participation from the sole Series A investor OrbiMed, as well as new investors including Life Sciences at Goldman Sachs Alternatives, DCVC Bio, Samsara BioCapital, Longwood Fund, Astellas Venture Management, and Alexandria Venture Investments. Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati advised Sidewinder Therapeutics on the transaction.
Alerts

3.12.26

USPTO Appeals Review Panel Addresses Obviousness-Type Double Patenting
USPTO convenes an Appeals Review Panel and authorizes amicus briefing to consider the basis for rejecting a patent application under the doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting.
Client Highlights

1.12.26

Firm Advises Mirador on Patent Matters Related to $250 Million Series B
On January 12, 2026, Mirador Therapeutics, Inc., a clinical-stage precision medicine company developing next-generation therapies for immune-mediated inflammatory and fibrotic diseases, announced it has closed a $250 million Series B financing, bringing total capital raised to more than $650 million since the company launched in March 2024. The proceeds enable Mirador to deliver proof-of-concept across all current programs and support the development of additional pipeline candidates. Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati has advised Mirador on patent matters since the company’s inception, and counseled Mirador on patent matters related to this latest transaction.
Client Highlights

1.09.26

Wilson Sonsini Advises Link Cell Therapies on Strategic Collaboration with Johnson & Johnson
On January 9, 2026, Link Cell Therapies, an oncology cell therapy company, announced a strategic collaboration with Johnson & Johnson to develop novel logic-gated LINK CAR T therapies. The collaboration follows the recently announced Series A financing in Link that was led by Johnson & Johnson, through its corporate venture capital organization, Johnson & Johnson Innovation - JJDC, Inc., which included participation of additional strategic and financial investors. Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati advised Link Cell Therapies on the matter.
Alerts

12.22.25

Continued Scrutiny of Genus Claims: The Written Description and Enablement Requirements for Broad and Previously Undisclosed Subgenera
Executive Summary
Client Highlights

12.16.25

Wilson Sonsini Advises Link Cell Therapies on Series A Financing
On December 15, 2025, Link Cell Therapies, an oncology cell therapy company, announced its official launch from stealth with a $60 million Series A financing that was led by Johnson & Johnson, through its corporate venture capital organization, Johnson & Johnson Innovation – JJDC, Inc., with participation from founding investors Samsara BioCapital and Sheatree Capital, as well as Wing Venture Capital and other new strategic and financial investors. Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati advised Link Cell Therapies on the transaction.
Alerts

12.10.25

Failure to Provide Correct Inventors to the USPTO Results in Unenforceable Patents
Executive Summary
Alerts

9.26.25

FDA’s Release of Complete Response Letters Raises Questions Related to Intellectual Property
Executive Summary
Alerts

9.26.25

Federal Circuit Issues First Precedent on AIA Derivation Proceedings Regarding Global Health Solutions v. Selner
Executive Summary
Alerts

9.04.25

Inventor’s Failure to Provide Material Information to the USPTO Results in an Unenforceable Patent
On August 20, 2025, the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware (court) found inequitable conduct when Applicant, Lindis Biotech, GMBH (Lindis), relied on data from hastily performed experiments to obtain a patent from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), while withholding from the USPTO more thorough contradictory data.
Alerts

8.14.25

Department of Commerce Initiates Bayh-Dole Compliance Review and Asserts March-In Proceeding Targeting Harvard University Patents
Executive Summary
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • people
  • insights
  • about us
  • careers
  • Binder
  • Alumni
  • Mailing List Signup
  • Client FTP Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Accessibility
WSGR logo
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Instagram
Youtube
Copyright © 2026 Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati. All Rights Reserved.