WSGR logoWSGR logo
WSGR logo
  • Experience
  • People
  • Insights
  • About Us
  • Careers

  • Practice Areas
  • Industries

  • Corporate
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Patents and Innovations
  • Regulatory
  • Technology Transactions

  • Capital Markets
  • Corporate Governance
  • Corporate Life Sciences
  • Derivatives
  • Emerging Companies and Venture Capital
  • Employee Benefits and Compensation
  • Energy and Climate Solutions
  • Executive Advisory Program
  • Finance and Structured Finance
  • Fund Formation
  • Greater China
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Private Equity
  • Public Company Representation
  • Real Estate
  • Restructuring
  • Shareholder Engagement and Activism
  • Tax
  • U.S. Expansion
  • Wealthtech

  • Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs)

  • Environmental, Social, and Governance

  • AI and Data Center Infrastructure
  • Energy Regulation and Competition
  • Project Development and M&A
  • Project Finance and Tax Credit Transactions
  • Sustainability and Decarbonization
  • Transportation Electrification

  • U.S. Expansion Library and Resources

  • Post-Grant Review
  • Trademark and Advertising

  • Antitrust Litigation
  • Arbitration
  • Board and Internal Investigations
  • Class Action Litigation
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Consumer Litigation
  • Corporate Governance Litigation
  • Employment Litigation
  • Executive Branch Updates
  • Government Investigations
  • Internet Strategy and Litigation
  • Patent Litigation
  • Securities Litigation
  • State Attorneys General
  • Supreme Court and Appellate Practice
  • Trade Secret Litigation
  • Trademark and Copyright Litigation
  • Trial
  • White Collar Crime

  • Advertising, Promotions, and Marketing
  • Antitrust and Competition
  • Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. (CFIUS)
  • Communications
  • Data, Privacy, and Cybersecurity
  • Export Control and Sanctions
  • FCPA and Anti-Corruption
  • FDA Regulatory, Healthcare, and Consumer Products
  • Federal Trade Commission
  • Fintech and Financial Services
  • Government Contracts
  • National Security and Trade
  • Payments
  • State Attorneys General
  • Strategic Risk and Crisis Management
  • Tariffs, Customs, and Import Compliance

  • Antitrust and Intellectual Property
  • Antitrust Civil Enforcement
  • Antitrust Compliance and Business Strategy
  • Antitrust Criminal Enforcement
  • Antitrust Litigation
  • Antitrust Merger Clearance
  • European Competition Law
  • Third-Party Merger and Non-Merger Antitrust Representation

  • Anti-Money Laundering
  • Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence (FOCI)
  • Team Telecom

  • AI in Healthcare
  • Animal Health
  • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
  • Aviation
  • Biotech
  • Blockchain and Cryptocurrency
  • Clean Energy
  • Climate and Clean Technologies
  • Communications and Networking
  • Consumer Products and Services
  • Data Storage and Cloud
  • Defense Tech
  • Diagnostics, Life Science Tools, and Deep Tech
  • Digital Health
  • Digital Media and Entertainment
  • Electronic Gaming
  • Fintech and Financial Services
  • FoodTech and AgTech
  • Global Generics
  • Internet
  • Life Sciences
  • Medical Devices
  • Mobile Devices
  • Mobility
  • NewSpace
  • Quantum Computing
  • Semiconductors
  • Software

  • Offices
  • Country Desks
  • Events
  • Pro Bono
  • Community
  • Our Diversity
  • Sustainability
  • Our Values
  • Board of Directors
  • Management Team

  • Austin
  • Boston
  • Boulder
  • Brussels
  • Century City
  • Hong Kong
  • London
  • Los Angeles
  • New York
  • Palo Alto
  • Salt Lake City
  • San Diego
  • San Francisco
  • Seattle
  • Shanghai
  • Washington, D.C.
  • Wilmington, DE

  • Law Students
  • Judicial Clerks
  • Experienced Attorneys
  • Patent Agents
  • Business Professionals
  • Alternative Legal Careers
  • Contact Recruiting
FTC Issues Final Rule Banning Fake and Misleading Consumer Reviews and Testimonials
Alerts
August 22, 2024

On August 14, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued a final rule that prohibits publishing or trading in fake or misleading consumer reviews and testimonials, or engaging in other related deceptive promotional tactics. Notably, under the FTC’s new rule, the commission will be authorized to seek civil penalties against violators.

The rule follows the FTC’s November 2022 advance notice of proposed rulemaking and July 2023 notice of proposed rulemaking, which Wilson Sonsini previously issued guidance on last summer. The rule will become effective on October 21, 2024.

The FTC’s final rule includes prohibitions on:

  • Creating, selling, and buying fake or false reviews or testimonials, including AI-generated fake reviews
  • Compensating or incentivizing consumers to write reviews that express a particular sentiment (whether positive or negative)
  • Using insider (i.e., officer, manager, employee, or agent) reviews and testimonials without a clear and conspicuous disclosure of the insider’s relationship to the business
  • Misrepresenting that a company-controlled website or entity provides independent reviews or opinions, other than consumer reviews, about a category of products or services that includes the business’s own products or services
  • Suppressing negative reviews, such as by removing negative reviews or using intimidation or unfounded legal threats to prevent negative reviews
  • Buying or selling fake indicators of social media influence, such as followers or views generated by a bot or hijacked account

The commission’s new rule raises the stakes for companies that solicit or rely on consumer reviews or testimonials. The FTC is now authorized to seek monetary fines of up to nearly $52,000 per violation of the rule (adjusted annually for inflation). Additionally, liability under the FTC’s new rule has been expanded to encompass companies that “knew or should have known” about certain prohibited conduct. For instance, if a business procures or disseminates fake reviews, that company may be in violation of the FTC’s new rule even if it had no actual knowledge that the reviews were inauthentic. As a result, companies may be required to increase monitoring efforts to avoid non-compliance and possible fines. Businesses should take care to closely review their policies and practices regarding the solicitation and management of reviews and testimonials.

Key Takeaways and Best Practices

  1. Solicit Reviews from Actual Consumers. Companies should not request reviews or testimonials from consumers who have not used the product or service. Companies also should not pre-populate or generate draft reviews for customers, including through AI-related technologies.
  2. Make Neutral Requests for Reviews. Companies should not offer consumers incentives for positive reviews. Instead, companies should use neutral language when soliciting reviews from consumers. For example, companies should avoid requests that imply that the consumer had a positive experience (e.g., “Tell us how much you loved our product and get a $10 coupon”) and instead opt for more neutral requests (e.g., “Leave us a review and receive $10 off your next order”).
  3. Approach All Reviews Neutrally. Companies should not hide or otherwise suppress negative reviews from consumers. Additionally, companies should not discourage consumers from posting negative reviews. If a review contains highly problematic content unrelated to sentiment (e.g., publication of trade secrets, inappropriate content, or fake or false reviews), that content may be removed regardless of the review’s positive or negative sentiment. Companies may also still contact customers to resolve reported issues within a review .
  4. Provide Clear and Conspicuous Disclosures. Where disclosures are needed—such as for incentivized or insider reviews or testimonials—companies should ensure that disclosures are “easily noticeable” and “easily understandable” by ordinary consumers. For example, disclosures should not be placed below the fold (e.g., visible only by clicking “more”) or buried within hashtags or links. Instead, businesses must ensure that disclosures stand out from accompanying text or other visual elements so that they are easily noticed, read, and understood.
  5. Conduct Active Monitoring. To ensure the legitimacy of reviews solicited by or posted to a company’s website, businesses should monitor for evidence of fake or false reviews and promptly investigate and remove reviews that appear to lack authenticity. For example, an influx of reviews, unnatural language, reference to a product or service outside a company’s offerings, or use of the wrong business name may indicate that one or more reviews are fake or false. When removing reviews due to concerns regarding their legitimacy, companies should take caution to ensure that they apply the same criterion equally to all reviews, regardless of sentiment.

For more information or advice concerning the FTC’s final rule or general review and testimonial compliance efforts, please contact Aaron Hendelman, Maneesha Mithal, Kelly Singleton, Allie Fellows, Boniface Echols, or another attorney in Wilson Sonsini’s advertising or data, privacy, and cybersecurity practices.

Contributors

  • Allie Huff
  • Aaron D. Hendelman
  • Maneesha Mithal
  • Kelly A. Singleton
  • people
  • insights
  • about us
  • careers
  • Binder
  • Alumni
  • Mailing List Signup
  • Client FTP Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Accessibility
WSGR logo
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Instagram
Youtube
Copyright © 2026 Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati. All Rights Reserved.