WSGR logoWSGR logo
WSGR logo
  • Experience
  • People
  • Insights
  • About Us
  • Careers

  • Practice Areas
  • Industries

  • Corporate
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Patents and Innovations
  • Regulatory
  • Technology Transactions

  • Capital Markets
  • Corporate Governance
  • Corporate Life Sciences
  • Derivatives
  • Emerging Companies and Venture Capital
  • Employee Benefits and Compensation
  • Energy and Climate Solutions
  • Executive Advisory Program
  • Finance and Structured Finance
  • Fund Formation
  • Greater China
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Private Equity
  • Public Company Representation
  • Real Estate
  • Restructuring
  • Shareholder Engagement and Activism
  • Tax
  • U.S. Expansion
  • Wealthtech

  • Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs)

  • Environmental, Social, and Governance

  • AI and Data Center Infrastructure
  • Energy Regulation and Competition
  • Project Development and M&A
  • Project Finance and Tax Credit Transactions
  • Sustainability and Decarbonization
  • Transportation Electrification

  • U.S. Expansion Library and Resources

  • Post-Grant Review
  • Trademark and Advertising

  • Antitrust Litigation
  • Arbitration
  • Board and Internal Investigations
  • Class Action Litigation
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Consumer Litigation
  • Corporate Governance Litigation
  • Employment Litigation
  • Executive Branch Updates
  • Government Investigations
  • Internet Strategy and Litigation
  • Patent Litigation
  • Securities Litigation
  • State Attorneys General
  • Supreme Court and Appellate Practice
  • Trade Secret Litigation
  • Trademark and Copyright Litigation
  • Trial
  • White Collar Crime

  • Advertising, Promotions, and Marketing
  • Antitrust and Competition
  • Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. (CFIUS)
  • Communications
  • Data, Privacy, and Cybersecurity
  • Export Control and Sanctions
  • FCPA and Anti-Corruption
  • FDA Regulatory, Healthcare, and Consumer Products
  • Federal Trade Commission
  • Fintech and Financial Services
  • Government Contracts
  • National Security and Trade
  • Payments
  • State Attorneys General
  • Strategic Risk and Crisis Management
  • Tariffs, Customs, and Import Compliance

  • Antitrust and Intellectual Property
  • Antitrust Civil Enforcement
  • Antitrust Compliance and Business Strategy
  • Antitrust Criminal Enforcement
  • Antitrust Litigation
  • Antitrust Merger Clearance
  • European Competition Law
  • Third-Party Merger and Non-Merger Antitrust Representation

  • Anti-Money Laundering
  • Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence (FOCI)
  • Team Telecom

  • AI in Healthcare
  • Animal Health
  • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
  • Aviation
  • Biotech
  • Blockchain and Cryptocurrency
  • Clean Energy
  • Climate and Clean Technologies
  • Communications and Networking
  • Consumer Products and Services
  • Data Storage and Cloud
  • Defense Tech
  • Diagnostics, Life Science Tools, and Deep Tech
  • Digital Health
  • Digital Media and Entertainment
  • Electronic Gaming
  • Fintech and Financial Services
  • FoodTech and AgTech
  • Global Generics
  • Internet
  • Life Sciences
  • Medical Devices
  • Mobile Devices
  • Mobility
  • NewSpace
  • Quantum Computing
  • Semiconductors
  • Software

  • Offices
  • Country Desks
  • Events
  • Community
  • Our Diversity
  • Sustainability
  • Our Values
  • Board of Directors
  • Management Team

  • Austin
  • Boston
  • Boulder
  • Brussels
  • Century City
  • Hong Kong
  • London
  • Los Angeles
  • New York
  • Palo Alto
  • Salt Lake City
  • San Diego
  • San Francisco
  • Seattle
  • Shanghai
  • Washington, D.C.
  • Wilmington, DE

  • Law Students
  • Judicial Clerks
  • Experienced Attorneys
  • Patent Agents
  • Business Professionals
  • Alternative Legal Careers
  • Contact Recruiting
California Mandates Female Representation on Boards of Directors
Alerts
October 1, 2018

On September 30, 2018, California Governor Jerry Brown signed legislation that is intended to ensure that public companies headquartered in California have at least one female director. This law, known as SB 826, provides for substantial penalties for noncompliance.

What is SB 826 and what does it do?

SB 826 provides that no later than December 31, 2019, each publicly held corporation—regardless of its jurisdiction of incorporation—with its principal executive offices in California (as disclosed in its Form 10-K) must have at least one female director or be subject to a fine. A "publicly held corporation" is one whose outstanding shares are listed on a major United States stock exchange.

By December 31, 2021, these corporations must have a minimum of:

  • three female directors, if they have six or more directors;
  • two female directors, if they have five directors; or
  • one female director, if they have four or fewer directors.

Are there any reporting obligations?

The California secretary of state must adopt implementing regulations, but it is expected that subject companies will be required to report on the gender composition of their board of directors, and this information will be made public. No later than July 1, 2019, the secretary of state must publish on its website a report documenting the number of companies whose principal executive offices are located in California and who have at least one female director.

No later than March 1, 2020, and then on an annual basis, the secretary of state must publish a report on its website regarding the number of:

  • companies subject to SB 826 that were in compliance with the law during at least one point during the preceding calendar year;
  • publicly held corporations that moved their U.S. headquarters to California from another state or out of California into another state during the preceding calendar year; and
  • publicly held corporations that were subject to SB 826 during the preceding year, but are no longer publicly traded.

What happens to a company that does not comply with SB 826?

Companies that do not comply with SB 826 are subject to a variety of fines, ranging from $100,000 for a first violation or a failure to timely file the required information with the secretary of state, to $300,000 for subsequent violations. A "violation" occurs when a director seat required to be held by a female is not held by a female during at least a portion of a calendar year.

What should be done now?

Although some commentators have expressed concern over the constitutionality of SB 826—for example, related to the interaction of SB 826 with corporate laws of other states—subject companies should begin making preparations to comply in order to avoid fines. SB 826 does permit companies to increase the number of directors in order to comply, but care should be taken to follow proper corporate formalities in doing so.

On a more practical level, companies should monitor the implementing regulations adopted by the secretary of state to understand the necessary reports that need to be filed to demonstrate compliance and report required information. Annual compliance calendars will also need to be updated to include this important filing.

For more information, please contact any member of the corporate law practice at Wilson Sonsini.

Contributors

  • Jose F. Macias
  • Lisa L. Stimmell
  • Amy L. Simmerman
  • Douglas K. Schnell
  • Katherine L. Henderson
  • people
  • insights
  • about us
  • careers
  • Binder
  • Alumni
  • Mailing List Signup
  • Client FTP Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Accessibility
WSGR logo
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Instagram
Youtube
Copyright © 2026 Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati. All Rights Reserved.