WSGR logoWSGR logo
WSGR logo
  • Experience
  • People
  • Insights
  • About Us
  • Careers

  • Practice Areas
  • Industries

  • Corporate
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Patents and Innovations
  • Regulatory
  • Technology Transactions

  • Capital Markets
  • Corporate Governance
  • Corporate Life Sciences
  • Derivatives
  • Emerging Companies and Venture Capital
  • Employee Benefits and Compensation
  • Energy and Climate Solutions
  • Executive Advisory Program
  • Finance and Structured Finance
  • Fund Formation
  • Greater China
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Private Equity
  • Public Company Representation
  • Real Estate
  • Restructuring
  • Shareholder Engagement and Activism
  • Tax
  • U.S. Expansion
  • Wealthtech

  • Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs)

  • Environmental, Social, and Governance

  • AI and Data Center Infrastructure
  • Energy Regulation and Competition
  • Project Development and M&A
  • Project Finance and Tax Credit Transactions
  • Sustainability and Decarbonization
  • Transportation Electrification

  • U.S. Expansion Library and Resources

  • Post-Grant Review
  • Trademark and Advertising

  • Antitrust Litigation
  • Arbitration
  • Board and Internal Investigations
  • Class Action Litigation
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Consumer Litigation
  • Corporate Governance Litigation
  • Employment Litigation
  • Executive Branch Updates
  • Government Investigations
  • Internet Strategy and Litigation
  • Patent Litigation
  • Securities Litigation
  • State Attorneys General
  • Supreme Court and Appellate Practice
  • Trade Secret Litigation
  • Trademark and Copyright Litigation
  • Trial
  • White Collar Crime

  • Advertising, Promotions, and Marketing
  • Antitrust and Competition
  • Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. (CFIUS)
  • Communications
  • Data, Privacy, and Cybersecurity
  • Export Control and Sanctions
  • FCPA and Anti-Corruption
  • FDA Regulatory, Healthcare, and Consumer Products
  • Federal Trade Commission
  • Fintech and Financial Services
  • Government Contracts
  • National Security and Trade
  • Payments
  • State Attorneys General
  • Strategic Risk and Crisis Management
  • Tariffs, Customs, and Import Compliance

  • Antitrust and Intellectual Property
  • Antitrust Civil Enforcement
  • Antitrust Compliance and Business Strategy
  • Antitrust Criminal Enforcement
  • Antitrust Litigation
  • Antitrust Merger Clearance
  • European Competition Law
  • Third-Party Merger and Non-Merger Antitrust Representation

  • Anti-Money Laundering
  • Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence (FOCI)
  • Team Telecom

  • AI in Healthcare
  • Animal Health
  • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
  • Aviation
  • Biotech
  • Blockchain and Cryptocurrency
  • Clean Energy
  • Climate and Clean Technologies
  • Communications and Networking
  • Consumer Products and Services
  • Data Storage and Cloud
  • Defense Tech
  • Diagnostics, Life Science Tools, and Deep Tech
  • Digital Health
  • Digital Media and Entertainment
  • Electronic Gaming
  • Fintech and Financial Services
  • FoodTech and AgTech
  • Global Generics
  • Internet
  • Life Sciences
  • Medical Devices
  • Mobile Devices
  • Mobility
  • NewSpace
  • Quantum Computing
  • Semiconductors
  • Software

  • Offices
  • Country Desks
  • Events
  • Community
  • Our Diversity
  • Sustainability
  • Our Values
  • Board of Directors
  • Management Team

  • Austin
  • Boston
  • Boulder
  • Brussels
  • Century City
  • Hong Kong
  • London
  • Los Angeles
  • New York
  • Palo Alto
  • Salt Lake City
  • San Diego
  • San Francisco
  • Seattle
  • Shanghai
  • Washington, D.C.
  • Wilmington, DE

  • Law Students
  • Judicial Clerks
  • Experienced Attorneys
  • Patent Agents
  • Business Professionals
  • Alternative Legal Careers
  • Contact Recruiting
Evan L. Seite
Partner
Litigation
Palo Alto
eseite@wsgr.com

D650-849-3289

Download vCard
Open PDF

Evan Seite is a partner in the Palo Alto office of Wilson Sonsini, where he is a member of the litigation department.  Evan specializes in several areas, including securities litigation and counseling, complex commercial litigation and arbitration, and government and internal investigations.  Evan frequently represents companies, as well as their officers and directors, in various types of litigation matters, including securities class actions, shareholder derivative suits, complex civil litigation and arbitration matters, and shareholder litigation.

Experience

Evan Seite is a partner in the Palo Alto office of Wilson Sonsini, where he is a member of the litigation department.  Evan specializes in several areas, including securities litigation and counseling, complex commercial litigation and arbitration, and government and internal investigations.  Evan frequently represents companies, as well as their officers and directors, in various types of litigation matters, including securities class actions, shareholder derivative suits, complex civil litigation and arbitration matters, and shareholder litigation.

Education
  • J.D., University of Iowa College of LawWith Distinction; Contributing Editor, Iowa Law Review
  • B.A., Economics, Grinnell College
Admissions
  • State Bar of California
  • U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
  • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
  • U.S. Supreme Court
Credentials
Education
  • J.D., University of Iowa College of LawWith Distinction; Contributing Editor, Iowa Law Review
  • B.A., Economics, Grinnell College
Admissions
  • State Bar of California
  • U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
  • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
  • U.S. Supreme Court

Current and Recent Matters

Securities Litigation and Derivative Actions

  • Represents Viatris in various securities class actions and derivative actions related to the transaction by which Upjohn and Mylan combined to form Viatris, the announcement of receipt of Form 483s and implementation of remediation programs, and a transaction involving the acquisition of Viatris’ biosimilars business. Secured dismissal with prejudice on the first round of briefing in the securities class action challenging the disclosures relating to Viatris’ biosimilars transaction, and the dismissal was affirmed by a panel of the Third Circuit.
  • Represented the former Chairman of Intelsat S.A. in a securities class action arising out of allegations of insider trading. The court granted defendants' motion to dismiss in full and with prejudice. On appeal, a panel of the Ninth Circuit recently affirmed dismissal.
  • Represented iRhythm in a securities class action arising from regulatory reimbursement rate determinations for iRhythm’s product, an ambulatory cardiac monitoring device. The first motion to dismiss was granted in full and with prejudice. On a recent review by a panel of the Ninth Circuit, iRhythm obtained dismissal of the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
  • Represented Precigen in a securities class action arising out of announcement of SEC cease and desist order relating to the company’s disclosures concerning its methane bioconversion platform. The court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss and the action was settled.
  • Represented Nutanix in a securities class action and derivative actions arising out of its announcement of quarterly guidance. The court in the class action granted the motion to dismiss with prejudice as to most of the allegedly misleading statements. The derivative action was dismissed for failure to plead demand futility and, thereafter, voluntarily dismissed following the plaintiffs’ election to pursue a litigation demand rather than amend the complaint. The securities class action settled.
  • Represented Nutanix in a securities class action and derivative action arising out of its announcement that evaluation software from two software providers was used in a non-compliant manner. The securities class action was dismissed following settlement with the lead plaintiff and the derivative actions were voluntarily dismissed thereafter.
  • Represented Dropbox in securities class actions in state and federal courts arising out of its IPO. The federal court granted defendants’ first motions to dismiss in their entirety and the state court granted a motion to dismiss based on Dropbox’s federal forum provision. The state court’s dismissal based on the federal forum provision was affirmed on appeal.
  • Represented SolarCity and its officers and directors in a securities class action and derivative action filed following the company’s restatement of financial results. The securities class action was dismissed with prejudice and the dismissal was affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.  The derivative action was dismissed.
  • Represented Celesta Capital in a securities class action arising from the publication of a short-seller report targeting Berkeley Lights, Inc. The court granted defendants’ motions to dismiss and plaintiff elected to voluntarily dismiss.
  • Represented Root9B, Inc. in a securities class action arising out of a short-seller report. The action was dismissed with prejudice and the dismissal was affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
  • Represented Juno Therapeutics and its officers in a securities class action filed following clinical trial setbacks.
  • Represented Rocket Fuel in a securities class action and derivative actions arising out of alleged misstatements regarding the company’s ability to detect “bot fraud,” a form of internet ad fraud. The motion to dismiss was granted as to all but one of the challenged statements.

Governmental and Internal Investigations

  • Represented the Audit Committee of a technology company in an internal investigation regarding serious employee misconduct.
  • Represented the Audit Committee of a technology company in an internal investigation regarding licensing matters.
  • Represented the former CFO of Walgreens in a publicly reported SEC investigation regarding the disclosure of financial goals.
  • Represented the former CFO of a technology company in an SEC investigation regarding insider trading allegations. Following the submission of a white paper, the SEC declined to pursue charges.
  • Represented a technology company in an SEC investigation regarding disclosure of non-GAAP financial metrics.
  • Represented the Audit Committee of a technology company in an internal investigation regarding accounting classification issues.
  • Represented an evaluation committee of the Board of Directors of E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company.
  • Represented a special investigatory committee of a life sciences company regarding the potential unauthorized disclosure of confidential information to company outsiders.

Select Other Representations

  • Represented officers and directors of Stem, a smart energy storage company, in a dispute regarding equity dilution stemming from various financing transactions.
  • Represented Sasken Communication Technologies in two international arbitration disputes against Spreadtrum Communications.
Matters

Current and Recent Matters

Securities Litigation and Derivative Actions

  • Represents Viatris in various securities class actions and derivative actions related to the transaction by which Upjohn and Mylan combined to form Viatris, the announcement of receipt of Form 483s and implementation of remediation programs, and a transaction involving the acquisition of Viatris’ biosimilars business. Secured dismissal with prejudice on the first round of briefing in the securities class action challenging the disclosures relating to Viatris’ biosimilars transaction, and the dismissal was affirmed by a panel of the Third Circuit.
  • Represented the former Chairman of Intelsat S.A. in a securities class action arising out of allegations of insider trading. The court granted defendants' motion to dismiss in full and with prejudice. On appeal, a panel of the Ninth Circuit recently affirmed dismissal.
  • Represented iRhythm in a securities class action arising from regulatory reimbursement rate determinations for iRhythm’s product, an ambulatory cardiac monitoring device. The first motion to dismiss was granted in full and with prejudice. On a recent review by a panel of the Ninth Circuit, iRhythm obtained dismissal of the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
  • Represented Precigen in a securities class action arising out of announcement of SEC cease and desist order relating to the company’s disclosures concerning its methane bioconversion platform. The court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss and the action was settled.
  • Represented Nutanix in a securities class action and derivative actions arising out of its announcement of quarterly guidance. The court in the class action granted the motion to dismiss with prejudice as to most of the allegedly misleading statements. The derivative action was dismissed for failure to plead demand futility and, thereafter, voluntarily dismissed following the plaintiffs’ election to pursue a litigation demand rather than amend the complaint. The securities class action settled.
  • Represented Nutanix in a securities class action and derivative action arising out of its announcement that evaluation software from two software providers was used in a non-compliant manner. The securities class action was dismissed following settlement with the lead plaintiff and the derivative actions were voluntarily dismissed thereafter.
  • Represented Dropbox in securities class actions in state and federal courts arising out of its IPO. The federal court granted defendants’ first motions to dismiss in their entirety and the state court granted a motion to dismiss based on Dropbox’s federal forum provision. The state court’s dismissal based on the federal forum provision was affirmed on appeal.
  • Represented SolarCity and its officers and directors in a securities class action and derivative action filed following the company’s restatement of financial results. The securities class action was dismissed with prejudice and the dismissal was affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.  The derivative action was dismissed.
  • Represented Celesta Capital in a securities class action arising from the publication of a short-seller report targeting Berkeley Lights, Inc. The court granted defendants’ motions to dismiss and plaintiff elected to voluntarily dismiss.
  • Represented Root9B, Inc. in a securities class action arising out of a short-seller report. The action was dismissed with prejudice and the dismissal was affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
  • Represented Juno Therapeutics and its officers in a securities class action filed following clinical trial setbacks.
  • Represented Rocket Fuel in a securities class action and derivative actions arising out of alleged misstatements regarding the company’s ability to detect “bot fraud,” a form of internet ad fraud. The motion to dismiss was granted as to all but one of the challenged statements.

Governmental and Internal Investigations

  • Represented the Audit Committee of a technology company in an internal investigation regarding serious employee misconduct.
  • Represented the Audit Committee of a technology company in an internal investigation regarding licensing matters.
  • Represented the former CFO of Walgreens in a publicly reported SEC investigation regarding the disclosure of financial goals.
  • Represented the former CFO of a technology company in an SEC investigation regarding insider trading allegations. Following the submission of a white paper, the SEC declined to pursue charges.
  • Represented a technology company in an SEC investigation regarding disclosure of non-GAAP financial metrics.
  • Represented the Audit Committee of a technology company in an internal investigation regarding accounting classification issues.
  • Represented an evaluation committee of the Board of Directors of E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company.
  • Represented a special investigatory committee of a life sciences company regarding the potential unauthorized disclosure of confidential information to company outsiders.

Select Other Representations

  • Represented officers and directors of Stem, a smart energy storage company, in a dispute regarding equity dilution stemming from various financing transactions.
  • Represented Sasken Communication Technologies in two international arbitration disputes against Spreadtrum Communications.

Select Speaking Engagments

  • Panelist, “Recent Trends in Securities Class Action Litigation: 2023 Full-Year Review,” NERA Economic Consulting, January 2024
Insights

Select Speaking Engagments

  • Panelist, “Recent Trends in Securities Class Action Litigation: 2023 Full-Year Review,” NERA Economic Consulting, January 2024
Focus Areas
  • Board and Internal Investigations
  • Class Action Litigation
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Corporate Governance
  • Corporate Governance Litigation
  • Government Investigations
  • Litigation
  • Securities Litigation
Recent Insights
Alerts
Takeaways from the Maduro Raid Prediction Market Indictment
On April 23, 2026, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) brought parallel civil and criminal charges against U.S. Army Master Sergeant Gannon Ken Van Dyke related to insider trading in connection with event contracts used in prediction markets. The civil complaint marks the first-ever insider trading case brought by the CFTC involving event contracts in prediction markets.
Learn More
Alerts
Nasdaq Board Diversity Rules Struck Down
On December 11, 2024, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC’s) order approving The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC’s (Nasdaq’s) board diversity listing standards. As a result of this ruling, Nasdaq-listed companies are no longer required to disclose the board diversity information specified in the rules.1 While such disclosure is no longer mandated, companies should continue to consider possible stakeholder interest in board diversity disclosure.
Learn More
View All
  • people
  • insights
  • about us
  • careers
  • Binder
  • Alumni
  • Mailing List Signup
  • Client FTP Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Accessibility
WSGR logo
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Instagram
Youtube
Copyright © 2026 Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati. All Rights Reserved.