WSGR logoWSGR logo
WSGR logo
  • Experience
  • People
  • Insights
  • About Us
  • Careers

  • Practice Areas
  • Industries

  • Corporate
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Patents and Innovations
  • Regulatory
  • Technology Transactions

  • Capital Markets
  • Corporate Governance
  • Corporate Life Sciences
  • Derivatives
  • Emerging Companies and Venture Capital
  • Employee Benefits and Compensation
  • Energy and Climate Solutions
  • Executive Advisory Program
  • Finance and Structured Finance
  • Fund Formation
  • Greater China
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Private Equity
  • Public Company Representation
  • Real Estate
  • Restructuring
  • Shareholder Engagement and Activism
  • Tax
  • U.S. Expansion
  • Wealthtech

  • Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs)

  • Environmental, Social, and Governance

  • AI and Data Center Infrastructure
  • Energy Regulation and Competition
  • Project Development and M&A
  • Project Finance and Tax Credit Transactions
  • Sustainability and Decarbonization
  • Transportation Electrification

  • U.S. Expansion Library and Resources

  • Post-Grant Review
  • Trademark and Advertising

  • Antitrust Litigation
  • Arbitration
  • Board and Internal Investigations
  • Class Action Litigation
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Consumer Litigation
  • Corporate Governance Litigation
  • Employment Litigation
  • Executive Branch Updates
  • Government Investigations
  • Internet Strategy and Litigation
  • Patent Litigation
  • Securities Litigation
  • State Attorneys General
  • Supreme Court and Appellate Practice
  • Trade Secret Litigation
  • Trademark and Copyright Litigation
  • Trial
  • White Collar Crime

  • Advertising, Promotions, and Marketing
  • Antitrust and Competition
  • Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. (CFIUS)
  • Communications
  • Data, Privacy, and Cybersecurity
  • Export Control and Sanctions
  • FCPA and Anti-Corruption
  • FDA Regulatory, Healthcare, and Consumer Products
  • Federal Trade Commission
  • Fintech and Financial Services
  • Government Contracts
  • National Security and Trade
  • Payments
  • State Attorneys General
  • Strategic Risk and Crisis Management
  • Tariffs, Customs, and Import Compliance

  • Antitrust and Intellectual Property
  • Antitrust Civil Enforcement
  • Antitrust Compliance and Business Strategy
  • Antitrust Criminal Enforcement
  • Antitrust Litigation
  • Antitrust Merger Clearance
  • European Competition Law
  • Third-Party Merger and Non-Merger Antitrust Representation

  • Anti-Money Laundering
  • Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence (FOCI)
  • Team Telecom

  • AI in Healthcare
  • Animal Health
  • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
  • Aviation
  • Biotech
  • Blockchain and Cryptocurrency
  • Clean Energy
  • Climate and Clean Technologies
  • Communications and Networking
  • Consumer Products and Services
  • Data Storage and Cloud
  • Defense Tech
  • Diagnostics, Life Science Tools, and Deep Tech
  • Digital Health
  • Digital Media and Entertainment
  • Electronic Gaming
  • Fintech and Financial Services
  • FoodTech and AgTech
  • Global Generics
  • Internet
  • Life Sciences
  • Medical Devices
  • Mobile Devices
  • Mobility
  • NewSpace
  • Quantum Computing
  • Semiconductors
  • Software

  • Offices
  • Country Desks
  • Events
  • Pro Bono
  • Community
  • Our Diversity
  • Sustainability
  • Our Values
  • Board of Directors
  • Management Team

  • Austin
  • Boston
  • Boulder
  • Brussels
  • Century City
  • Hong Kong
  • London
  • Los Angeles
  • New York
  • Palo Alto
  • Salt Lake City
  • San Diego
  • San Francisco
  • Seattle
  • Shanghai
  • Washington, D.C.
  • Wilmington, DE

  • Law Students
  • Judicial Clerks
  • Experienced Attorneys
  • Patent Agents
  • Business Professionals
  • Alternative Legal Careers
  • Contact Recruiting
Wilson Sonsini Secures Denial of Petition for Emergency Anti-Suit Injunction on Behalf of Sinovac
Client Highlights
June 20, 2025

On June 20, 2025, U.S. District Judge Ronnie Abrams of the Southern District of New York sided with Wilson Sonsini clients Sinovac Biotech, Ltd. and 1Globe Capital LLC, and denied Prime Success, L.P.’s emergency request for injunctive relief in aid of arbitration. Sinovac is a Chinese vaccine manufacturer and developed and commercialized CoronaVac—the leading COVID-19 vaccine in the world.

Petitioner Prime Success had sought an anti-suit injunction to enjoin Sinovac from prosecuting a currently pending Antiguan court proceeding. Instead, Prime Success argued that the same issues should be heard in a Hong Kong arbitration it also brought regarding the same issues at stake in the Antiguan case.

As background, earlier this year, the Judicial Committee for the Privy Council—the highest court for UK overseas territories and Crown dependencies—determined that the former directors of Sinovac, who lost a 2018 board election and refused to cede control thereafter, have been “imposters” ever since. Prime Success is a member of the group that suffered that resounding defeat at the Privy Council.

Prime Success and other similarly situated shareholders received their shares in Sinovac from a PIPE transaction during the time when the “imposter” board was in de facto control of Sinovac. The current board of Sinovac has taken the position that those PIPE shares are invalid and should be set aside. Sinovac filed the Antiguan action to confirm this necessary effect of the Privy Council judgment.

In an effort to collaterally attack the Privy Council judgment and the Antiguan action, Prime Success brought an action in the Southern District of New York for emergency injunctive relief purportedly in aid of the arbitration it also brought against Sinovac in Hong Kong.

Judge Abrams agreed with Wilson Sonsini that the strict requirements for issuing an anti-suit injunction had not been met. Judge Abrams explained that “Sinovac ha[s] asked the Antiguan court to determine, as a matter of Antiguan law, whether Prime Success is a lawful shareholder of Sinovac” and that the Antiguan court is in a better position to decide that question than the Southern District of New York. Accordingly, Judge Abrams denied Prime Success’s petition.

The Wilson Sonsini team was led by partners Moe Fodeman and Sheryl Shapiro Bassin and senior associate Alec Luhring.

For more information, please see the court’s decision. Additional coverage is available in Law360.

Matter Leads

  • Moe Fodeman
  • Sheryl Shapiro Bassin
  • Alec Luhring
  • people
  • insights
  • about us
  • careers
  • Binder
  • Alumni
  • Mailing List Signup
  • Client FTP Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Accessibility
WSGR logo
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Instagram
Youtube
Copyright © 2026 Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati. All Rights Reserved.