WSGR logoWSGR logo
WSGR logo
  • Experience
  • People
  • Insights
  • About Us
  • Careers

  • Practice Areas
  • Industries

  • Corporate
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Patents and Innovations
  • Regulatory
  • Technology Transactions

  • Capital Markets
  • Corporate Governance
  • Corporate Life Sciences
  • Derivatives
  • Emerging Companies and Venture Capital
  • Employee Benefits and Compensation
  • Energy and Climate Solutions
  • Executive Advisory Program
  • Finance and Structured Finance
  • Fund Formation
  • Greater China
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Private Equity
  • Public Company Representation
  • Real Estate
  • Restructuring
  • Shareholder Engagement and Activism
  • Tax
  • U.S. Expansion
  • Wealthtech

  • Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs)

  • Environmental, Social, and Governance

  • AI and Data Center Infrastructure
  • Energy Regulation and Competition
  • Project Development and M&A
  • Project Finance and Tax Credit Transactions
  • Sustainability and Decarbonization
  • Transportation Electrification

  • U.S. Expansion Library and Resources

  • Post-Grant Review
  • Trademark and Advertising

  • Antitrust Litigation
  • Arbitration
  • Board and Internal Investigations
  • Class Action Litigation
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Consumer Litigation
  • Corporate Governance Litigation
  • Employment Litigation
  • Executive Branch Updates
  • Government Investigations
  • Internet Strategy and Litigation
  • Patent Litigation
  • Securities Litigation
  • State Attorneys General
  • Supreme Court and Appellate Practice
  • Trade Secret Litigation
  • Trademark and Copyright Litigation
  • Trial
  • White Collar Crime

  • Advertising, Promotions, and Marketing
  • Antitrust and Competition
  • Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. (CFIUS)
  • Communications
  • Data, Privacy, and Cybersecurity
  • Export Control and Sanctions
  • FCPA and Anti-Corruption
  • FDA Regulatory, Healthcare, and Consumer Products
  • Federal Trade Commission
  • Fintech and Financial Services
  • Government Contracts
  • National Security and Trade
  • Payments
  • State Attorneys General
  • Strategic Risk and Crisis Management
  • Tariffs, Customs, and Import Compliance

  • Antitrust and Intellectual Property
  • Antitrust Civil Enforcement
  • Antitrust Compliance and Business Strategy
  • Antitrust Criminal Enforcement
  • Antitrust Litigation
  • Antitrust Merger Clearance
  • European Competition Law
  • Third-Party Merger and Non-Merger Antitrust Representation

  • Anti-Money Laundering
  • Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence (FOCI)
  • Team Telecom

  • AI in Healthcare
  • Animal Health
  • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
  • Aviation
  • Biotech
  • Blockchain and Cryptocurrency
  • Clean Energy
  • Climate and Clean Technologies
  • Communications and Networking
  • Consumer Products and Services
  • Data Storage and Cloud
  • Defense Tech
  • Diagnostics, Life Science Tools, and Deep Tech
  • Digital Health
  • Digital Media and Entertainment
  • Electronic Gaming
  • Fintech and Financial Services
  • FoodTech and AgTech
  • Global Generics
  • Internet
  • Life Sciences
  • Medical Devices
  • Mobile Devices
  • Mobility
  • NewSpace
  • Quantum Computing
  • Semiconductors
  • Software

  • Offices
  • Country Desks
  • Events
  • Community
  • Our Diversity
  • Sustainability
  • Our Values
  • Board of Directors
  • Management Team

  • Austin
  • Boston
  • Boulder
  • Brussels
  • Century City
  • Hong Kong
  • London
  • Los Angeles
  • New York
  • Palo Alto
  • Salt Lake City
  • San Diego
  • San Francisco
  • Seattle
  • Shanghai
  • Washington, D.C.
  • Wilmington, DE

  • Law Students
  • Judicial Clerks
  • Experienced Attorneys
  • Patent Agents
  • Business Professionals
  • Alternative Legal Careers
  • Contact Recruiting
Telefônica Brasil Case Reinforces Gifts and Hospitality Risks
Alerts
May 10, 2019

On May 9, 2019, Telefônica Brasil agreed to pay a US$4.13 million civil fine to settle U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission charges for violations of the internal accounting controls and recordkeeping provisions of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 (the FCPA) related to sporting tickets and hospitality provided to foreign government officials in connection with two high-profile soccer tournaments. The case serves as an important reminder of the significant risks associated with providing gifts and entertainment to officials, even in situations in which particular officials may not be in a position to exercise direct influence over a pending government decision but might be in a position to do so, and the gifts are merely given to engender "goodwill" with local officials.

In March 2012, Telefônica Brasil, whose American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) are traded in the United States, purchased 1,860 tickets for the 2014 World Cup from a FIFA vendor at a cost of approximately $5.1 million. An internal memorandum stated the purchase was "for relationship-building activities with strategic audiences." However, it was understood within the company, including by senior managers who had approved the purchase, that government officials would be receiving some of the tickets. A total of 194 World Cup tickets and related hospitality were given to 93 government officials from several countries, at a total value of $621,576. While most of the tickets were given to government officials who were "significant to the company's business interests," the SEC Order also includes references to officials who may not have had direct influence over the company but were influential merely in "opening doors" for Telefônica Brasil. In 2013, Telefônica Brasil engaged in a similar practice, providing a total of 38 Confederations Cup tickets and related hospitality to 34 government officials at a total value of $117,230.

According to the SEC's Order, while Telefônica Brasil had a code of ethics that prohibited bribery, it "lacked internal accounting controls sufficient to implement or maintain these policies and prevent giving things of value, like World Cup tickets, to government officials where such gifts might influence or reward an official decision (emphasis added)." Among other things, the Order observed that the company's management focused on employees accepting gifts and hospitality rather than providing gifts and hospitality, and that the broader prohibition against bribery was "not followed due to the lack of internal accounting controls, a compliance breakdown, and a deficient internal audit function."

In addition, the SEC Order states that Telefônica Brasil's records failed to properly account for the purchase of the tickets, characterizing the purchase of the tickets and related hospitality as being for "general advertising and publicity purposes." As a result, the SEC concluded that the company's books and records did not "in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the company's assets."

The Telefônica Brasil case is a powerful reminder of the significant risks of providing any gifts and hospitality to foreign government officials even in situations where the recipients are not presently in a position to directly benefit the company. The case should prove useful to compliance officers as part of their ongoing efforts to enhance training protocols and compliance alerts to include "real life" examples of FCPA risks that should resonate with a broad audience within most companies.

The full text of the SEC Order can be found here.

For more information about this publication, please email FCPA@wsgr.com, or contact any WSGR member of the regulatory and compliance practice.

Contributors

  • Seth Cowell
  • people
  • insights
  • about us
  • careers
  • Binder
  • Alumni
  • Mailing List Signup
  • Client FTP Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Accessibility
WSGR logo
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Instagram
Youtube
Copyright © 2026 Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati. All Rights Reserved.