WSGR logoWSGR logo
WSGR logo
  • Experience
  • People
  • Insights
  • About Us
  • Careers

  • Practice Areas
  • Industries

  • Corporate
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Patents and Innovations
  • Regulatory
  • Technology Transactions

  • Capital Markets
  • Corporate Governance
  • Corporate Life Sciences
  • Derivatives
  • Emerging Companies and Venture Capital
  • Employee Benefits and Compensation
  • Energy and Climate Solutions
  • Executive Advisory Program
  • Finance and Structured Finance
  • Fund Formation
  • Greater China
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Private Equity
  • Public Company Representation
  • Real Estate
  • Restructuring
  • Shareholder Engagement and Activism
  • Tax
  • U.S. Expansion
  • Wealthtech

  • Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs)

  • Environmental, Social, and Governance

  • AI and Data Center Infrastructure
  • Energy Regulation and Competition
  • Project Development and M&A
  • Project Finance and Tax Credit Transactions
  • Sustainability and Decarbonization
  • Transportation Electrification

  • U.S. Expansion Library and Resources

  • Post-Grant Review
  • Trademark and Advertising

  • Antitrust Litigation
  • Arbitration
  • Board and Internal Investigations
  • Class Action Litigation
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Consumer Litigation
  • Corporate Governance Litigation
  • Employment Litigation
  • Executive Branch Updates
  • Government Investigations
  • Internet Strategy and Litigation
  • Patent Litigation
  • Securities Litigation
  • State Attorneys General
  • Supreme Court and Appellate Practice
  • Trade Secret Litigation
  • Trademark and Copyright Litigation
  • Trial
  • White Collar Crime

  • Advertising, Promotions, and Marketing
  • Antitrust and Competition
  • Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. (CFIUS)
  • Communications
  • Data, Privacy, and Cybersecurity
  • Export Control and Sanctions
  • FCPA and Anti-Corruption
  • FDA Regulatory, Healthcare, and Consumer Products
  • Federal Trade Commission
  • Fintech and Financial Services
  • Government Contracts
  • National Security and Trade
  • Payments
  • State Attorneys General
  • Strategic Risk and Crisis Management
  • Tariffs, Customs, and Import Compliance

  • Antitrust and Intellectual Property
  • Antitrust Civil Enforcement
  • Antitrust Compliance and Business Strategy
  • Antitrust Criminal Enforcement
  • Antitrust Litigation
  • Antitrust Merger Clearance
  • European Competition Law
  • Third-Party Merger and Non-Merger Antitrust Representation

  • Anti-Money Laundering
  • Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence (FOCI)
  • Team Telecom

  • AI in Healthcare
  • Animal Health
  • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
  • Aviation
  • Biotech
  • Blockchain and Cryptocurrency
  • Clean Energy
  • Climate and Clean Technologies
  • Communications and Networking
  • Consumer Products and Services
  • Data Storage and Cloud
  • Defense Tech
  • Diagnostics, Life Science Tools, and Deep Tech
  • Digital Health
  • Digital Media and Entertainment
  • Electronic Gaming
  • Fintech and Financial Services
  • FoodTech and AgTech
  • Global Generics
  • Internet
  • Life Sciences
  • Medical Devices
  • Mobile Devices
  • Mobility
  • NewSpace
  • Quantum Computing
  • Semiconductors
  • Software

  • Offices
  • Country Desks
  • Events
  • Pro Bono
  • Community
  • Our Diversity
  • Sustainability
  • Our Values
  • Board of Directors
  • Management Team

  • Austin
  • Boston
  • Boulder
  • Brussels
  • Century City
  • Hong Kong
  • London
  • Los Angeles
  • New York
  • Palo Alto
  • Salt Lake City
  • San Diego
  • San Francisco
  • Seattle
  • Shanghai
  • Washington, D.C.
  • Wilmington, DE

  • Law Students
  • Judicial Clerks
  • Experienced Attorneys
  • Patent Agents
  • Business Professionals
  • Alternative Legal Careers
  • Contact Recruiting
Streamlining Innovation in Space-Related Acquisitions: OMB Proposes a Broadening of NASA’s Procurement Tools
Alerts
July 21, 2025

In July 2025, the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) proposed legislative changes to current procurement laws that include a recommendation to provide the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) with permanent statutory authority to utilize Commercial Solutions Openings (CSOs) and Other Transaction agreements (OTAs). These acquisition tools, long used by the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), are designed to reduce procurement barriers, accelerate timelines, and enable engagement with innovative commercial vendors, particularly those that do not traditionally contract with the federal government. Together, these changes are intended to substantially enhance NASA’s ability to access cutting-edge technologies and support complex mission needs by enabling NASA to engage in faster, more agile procurement, reduce administrative overhead, and broaden participation by start-ups, research institutions, and commercial technology providers.

The proposed legislation would make two significant changes that could benefit companies looking to break into contracting with NASA. First, it would make NASA’s existing CSO authority permanent and extend its applicability to awards from $10 million to $100 million. Under a CSO, agencies may solicit proposals for innovative commercial solutions through simplified, non-FAR-based procedures. Unlike traditional solicitations, CSOs focus on outcomes and allow for greater flexibility in how offers are evaluated and awarded. The proposed changes mirror the authority already made permanent for DoD under prior National Defense Authorization Act legislation and reflect growing interest in expanding the government’s access to nontraditional contractors.

Second, the proposal would grant NASA permanent authority (it was set to expire in 2029) to use OTAs for prototype projects. OTAs allow for more flexible contracting when compared to traditional government procurement (i.e., pursuant to the Federal Acquisition Regulation, or FAR). OTA’s are not subject to the FAR and therefore include fewer extra-contract compliance obligations that apply to FAR-based procurement. Importantly, the proposed authority includes the ability to issue noncompetitive follow-on production contracts, provided the initial prototype effort was successful and met statutory conditions. This provision would allow NASA to move directly from prototyping to scaled production without issuing a new competitive solicitation.

These changes, if adopted, would present increased opportunities to partner with NASA under flexible terms that more closely resemble commercial transactions that expand NASA’s access to commercial innovation while reducing procurement timelines and compliance burdens. The agency’s growing portfolio—including Moon-to-Mars missions, climate monitoring, and deep space communications—requires faster access to emerging technologies that may not fit within the traditional FAR-based process. While these changes have only been proposed and it is not clear whether they will gain support in Congress, by establishing permanent CSO and OTA authorities, Congress would signal support for acquisition models that prioritize speed, flexibility, and innovation.

We will follow this proposed legislation and other proposed changes to the rules surrounding government procurements. For questions about this or any matter concerning your business with the federal government, please contact one of Wilson Sonsini’s Government Contracts attorneys.

Contributors

  • Seth Cowell
  • Timothy (Tim) Cox
  • Mark Bass
  • Mark R. Fitzgerald
  • Curt Blake
  • people
  • insights
  • about us
  • careers
  • Binder
  • Alumni
  • Mailing List Signup
  • Client FTP Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Accessibility
WSGR logo
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Instagram
Youtube
Copyright © 2026 Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati. All Rights Reserved.