WSGR logoWSGR logo
WSGR logo
  • Experience
  • People
  • Insights
  • About Us
  • Careers

  • Practice Areas
  • Industries

  • Corporate
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Patents and Innovations
  • Regulatory
  • Technology Transactions

  • Capital Markets
  • Corporate Governance
  • Corporate Life Sciences
  • Derivatives
  • Emerging Companies and Venture Capital
  • Employee Benefits and Compensation
  • Energy and Climate Solutions
  • Executive Advisory Program
  • Finance and Structured Finance
  • Fund Formation
  • Greater China
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Private Equity
  • Public Company Representation
  • Real Estate
  • Restructuring
  • Shareholder Engagement and Activism
  • Tax
  • U.S. Expansion

  • Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs)

  • Environmental, Social, and Governance

  • AI and Data Center Infrastructure
  • Energy Regulation and Competition
  • Project Development and M&A
  • Project Finance and Tax Credit Transactions
  • Sustainability and Decarbonization
  • Transportation Electrification

  • U.S. Expansion Library and Resources

  • Post-Grant Review
  • Trademark and Advertising

  • Antitrust Litigation
  • Arbitration
  • Board and Internal Investigations
  • Class Action Litigation
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Consumer Litigation
  • Corporate Governance Litigation
  • Employment Litigation
  • Government Investigations
  • Internet Strategy and Litigation
  • Patent Litigation
  • Securities Litigation
  • State Attorneys General
  • Supreme Court and Appellate Practice
  • Trade Secret Litigation
  • Trademark and Copyright Litigation
  • Trial
  • White Collar Crime

  • Advertising, Promotions, and Marketing
  • Antitrust and Competition
  • Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. (CFIUS)
  • Communications
  • Data, Privacy, and Cybersecurity
  • Export Control and Sanctions
  • FCPA and Anti-Corruption
  • Federal Trade Commission
  • Fintech and Financial Services
  • Government Contracts
  • Healthcare and FDA Regulatory
  • National Security and Trade
  • Payments
  • State Attorneys General
  • Strategic Risk and Crisis Management
  • Tariffs, Customs, and Import Compliance

  • Antitrust and Intellectual Property
  • Antitrust Civil Enforcement
  • Antitrust Compliance and Business Strategy
  • Antitrust Criminal Enforcement
  • Antitrust Litigation
  • Antitrust Merger Clearance
  • European Competition Law
  • Third-Party Merger and Non-Merger Antitrust Representation

  • FDA Regulatory and Compliance

  • Anti-Money Laundering
  • Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence (FOCI)
  • Team Telecom

  • AI in Healthcare
  • Animal Health
  • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
  • Aviation
  • Biotech
  • Blockchain and Cryptocurrency
  • Clean Energy
  • Climate and Clean Technologies
  • Communications and Networking
  • Consumer Products and Services
  • Data Storage and Cloud
  • Defense Tech
  • Diagnostics, Life Science Tools, and Deep Tech
  • Digital Health
  • Digital Media and Entertainment
  • Electronic Gaming
  • Fintech and Financial Services
  • FoodTech and AgTech
  • Global Generics
  • Internet
  • Life Sciences
  • Medical Devices
  • Mobile Devices
  • Mobility
  • NewSpace
  • Quantum Computing
  • Semiconductors
  • Software

  • Offices
  • Country Desks
  • Events
  • Community
  • Our Diversity
  • Sustainability
  • Our Values
  • Board of Directors
  • Management Team

  • Austin
  • Boston
  • Boulder
  • Brussels
  • Century City
  • Hong Kong
  • London
  • Los Angeles
  • New York
  • Palo Alto
  • Salt Lake City
  • San Diego
  • San Francisco
  • Seattle
  • Shanghai
  • Washington, D.C.
  • Wilmington, DE

  • Law Students
  • Judicial Clerks
  • Experienced Attorneys
  • Patent Agents
  • Business Professionals
  • Alternative Legal Careers
  • Contact Recruiting
Status of California Climate Laws: Deadline for SB 253 Reporting Delayed Until November; SB 261 Remains Stayed
Alerts
July 21, 2026

The California Air Resources Board (CARB) is updating its regulatory proposal related to SB 253, which will defer the reporting deadline for entities to report Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from August 10, 2026, to November 10, 2026. During this time, CARB will propose limited changes to the regulation to clarify certain requirements. CARB’s proposed changes to SB 253 will be available for public comment.

The California Corporate Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program authorized by SB 253 (codified in California Health and Safety Code (HSC) § 38532) requires private and public U.S.-based companies with total annual revenues in excess of $1 billion that do business in California to annually disclose their Scope 1, Scope 2, and Scope 3 emissions for the prior fiscal year. SB 253 requires that the initial (first-year) annual emissions disclosures in 2026 address Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions, and in subsequent years (beginning in 2027), include Scope 3 emissions.

In-scope companies should continue to work toward compliance based on the existing requirements of SB 253 and related guidance released by CARB, which can be found on CARB’s website. Companies should also continue to monitor CARB’s website for the proposed changes to SB 253. CARB has not indicated that it will change its first-year compliance accommodations, which allow companies to (i) use flexible reporting formats, or (ii) submit a letter stating they will not undertake first-year reporting under SB 253 because they had not collected Scope 1 and Scope 2 data as of December 2024.

As a reminder, SB 261 remains stayed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Ninth Circuit) pending the court’s ruling on an appeal of a lower court’s denial of a motion for a preliminary injunction in litigation challenging SB 261 and SB 253. The Climate-Related Financial Risk Disclosure Program authorized by SB 261 (codified in HSC § 38533) requires private and public U.S.-based companies with total annual revenues in excess of $500 million that do business in California to publish biennial climate-related financial risk reports.

The Ninth Circuit’s pending decision may be rendered at any time, including ahead of the new proposed deadline for compliance with SB 253. The Ninth Circuit's decision may affect compliance obligations under both laws. The court could lift the existing stay on SB 261, requiring in-scope companies to prepare for disclosure under both statutes. Alternatively, the court could enjoin SB 253, placing both laws on indefinite hold.

For more information on this topic or any related matter, please contact any member of the Wilson Sonsini’s Corporate practice.

Contributors

  • Amanda N. Urquiza
  • Richard C. Blake
  • people
  • insights
  • about us
  • careers
  • Binder
  • Alumni
  • Mailing List Signup
  • Client FTP Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Accessibility
WSGR logo
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Instagram
Youtube
Copyright © 2026 Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati. All Rights Reserved.