WSGR logoWSGR logo
WSGR logo
  • Experience
  • People
  • Insights
  • About Us
  • Careers

  • Practice Areas
  • Industries

  • Corporate
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Patents and Innovations
  • Regulatory
  • Technology Transactions

  • Capital Markets
  • Corporate Governance
  • Corporate Life Sciences
  • Derivatives
  • Emerging Companies and Venture Capital
  • Employee Benefits and Compensation
  • Energy and Climate Solutions
  • Executive Advisory Program
  • Finance and Structured Finance
  • Fund Formation
  • Greater China
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Private Equity
  • Public Company Representation
  • Real Estate
  • Restructuring
  • Shareholder Engagement and Activism
  • Tax
  • U.S. Expansion
  • Wealthtech

  • Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs)

  • Environmental, Social, and Governance

  • AI and Data Center Infrastructure
  • Energy Regulation and Competition
  • Project Development and M&A
  • Project Finance and Tax Credit Transactions
  • Sustainability and Decarbonization
  • Transportation Electrification

  • U.S. Expansion Library and Resources

  • Post-Grant Review
  • Trademark and Advertising

  • Antitrust Litigation
  • Arbitration
  • Board and Internal Investigations
  • Class Action Litigation
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Consumer Litigation
  • Corporate Governance Litigation
  • Employment Litigation
  • Executive Branch Updates
  • Government Investigations
  • Internet Strategy and Litigation
  • Patent Litigation
  • Securities Litigation
  • State Attorneys General
  • Supreme Court and Appellate Practice
  • Trade Secret Litigation
  • Trademark and Copyright Litigation
  • Trial
  • White Collar Crime

  • Advertising, Promotions, and Marketing
  • Antitrust and Competition
  • Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. (CFIUS)
  • Communications
  • Data, Privacy, and Cybersecurity
  • Export Control and Sanctions
  • FCPA and Anti-Corruption
  • FDA Regulatory, Healthcare, and Consumer Products
  • Federal Trade Commission
  • Fintech and Financial Services
  • Government Contracts
  • National Security and Trade
  • Payments
  • State Attorneys General
  • Strategic Risk and Crisis Management
  • Tariffs, Customs, and Import Compliance

  • Antitrust and Intellectual Property
  • Antitrust Civil Enforcement
  • Antitrust Compliance and Business Strategy
  • Antitrust Criminal Enforcement
  • Antitrust Litigation
  • Antitrust Merger Clearance
  • European Competition Law
  • Third-Party Merger and Non-Merger Antitrust Representation

  • Anti-Money Laundering
  • Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence (FOCI)
  • Team Telecom

  • AI in Healthcare
  • Animal Health
  • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
  • Aviation
  • Biotech
  • Blockchain and Cryptocurrency
  • Clean Energy
  • Climate and Clean Technologies
  • Communications and Networking
  • Consumer Products and Services
  • Data Storage and Cloud
  • Defense Tech
  • Diagnostics, Life Science Tools, and Deep Tech
  • Digital Health
  • Digital Media and Entertainment
  • Electronic Gaming
  • Fintech and Financial Services
  • FoodTech and AgTech
  • Global Generics
  • Internet
  • Life Sciences
  • Medical Devices
  • Mobile Devices
  • Mobility
  • NewSpace
  • Quantum Computing
  • Semiconductors
  • Software

  • Offices
  • Country Desks
  • Events
  • Community
  • Our Diversity
  • Sustainability
  • Our Values
  • Board of Directors
  • Management Team

  • Austin
  • Boston
  • Boulder
  • Brussels
  • Century City
  • Hong Kong
  • London
  • Los Angeles
  • New York
  • Palo Alto
  • Salt Lake City
  • San Diego
  • San Francisco
  • Seattle
  • Shanghai
  • Washington, D.C.
  • Wilmington, DE

  • Law Students
  • Judicial Clerks
  • Experienced Attorneys
  • Patent Agents
  • Business Professionals
  • Alternative Legal Careers
  • Contact Recruiting
Firm Secures Win in Pro Bono Case Involving Former Colombian Paramilitary Leader
Client Highlights
September 28, 2021

On September 27, 2021, a federal court in Florida ruled that former Colombian paramilitary leader Carlos Mario Jiménez Naranjo, aka “Macaco,” is liable for the extrajudicial killing of Eduardo Estrada, a beloved community leader in the Middle Magdalena region of Colombia. Over a thousand people attended Eduardo’s funeral after he was brutally gunned down in 2001 by paramilitaries commanded by Macaco.

Macaco was the head of the Bloque Central Bolívar (BCB), a division of the paramilitary group called United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia (AUC). A self-described “killing machine,” the BCB murdered, disappeared, and tortured thousands of civilians. In today’s landmark decision, the court found that the BCB’s human rights violations were facilitated by the Colombian military. “The symbiotic relationship between state actors and paramilitaries, acknowledged for the first time by a U.S court, enabled the BCB’s campaign of murder and torture,” said Dylan Savage, litigation associate at Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, which served as co-counsel for plaintiffs with the Center for Justice and Accountability (CJA) and local counsel Kerrigan Estess Rankin McLeod & Thompson.

Macaco, like more than a dozen other high-ranking paramilitaries who demobilized in 2005 and began to take part in truth-telling in Colombia’s Justice and Peace process, was extradited to the United States solely on drug trafficking charges in 2008. Many of these paramilitaries were implicated in human rights crimes, but their removal to the United States abruptly upended any opportunity for survivors to seek truth and reparations against them in Colombia. This case, which was filed in 2010 in the Southern District of Florida, refocused attention on the devastating human rights toll inflicted by Macaco. “The United States government had the opportunity to prosecute Macaco for his human rights crimes when they sought his extradition from Colombia,” said Daniel McLaughlin, Senior Staff Attorney at CJA. “Its decision to focus solely on narco-trafficking charges, however, means that today’s ruling may be the only accountability Macaco sees for his human rights crimes.”

Gustavo Gallón, Director of the Colombian Commission of Jurists, which represents the plaintiffs in Colombia, added: “We truly hope that the decision of the federal court in Florida will contribute to our accountability efforts for the BCB’s killings and will also send a strong message to Colombian victims of human rights abuses not to lose hope.”

“This is a victory for truth,” said Claret Vargas, Senior Staff Attorney at CJA. “After over a decade of litigation and over a thousand pages of evidence—including statements by Macaco, admissions by former paramilitary members in depositions, expert reports, and eyewitness testimony—a court has acknowledged the facts surrounding Eduardo’s assassination and held the head of the BCB liable.”

“While nothing will bring Eduardo back to his beloved community and family, we are thankful for the court’s ruling, the trust and perseverance of our clients, and our collaboration with CJA. From strategy meetings in Palo Alto, to a fact-finding investigation on the ground in Bogota, to depositions of high-level former paramilitaries in Medellin, this was a true and sustained team effort. The result exemplifies how and why we pour our hearts into every matter,” said Luke Liss, Senior Counsel and Pro Bono Counsel at Wilson Sonsini.

For more information, please refer to the court’s order, Law360's coverage, or The Intercept’s coverage. 

  • people
  • insights
  • about us
  • careers
  • Binder
  • Alumni
  • Mailing List Signup
  • Client FTP Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Accessibility
WSGR logo
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Instagram
Youtube
Copyright © 2026 Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati. All Rights Reserved.