WSGR logoWSGR logo
WSGR logo
  • Experience
  • People
  • Insights
  • About Us
  • Careers

  • Practice Areas
  • Industries

  • Corporate
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Patents and Innovations
  • Regulatory
  • Technology Transactions

  • Broker-Dealer
  • Capital Markets
  • Corporate Governance
  • Corporate Life Sciences
  • Derivatives
  • Emerging Companies
  • Employee Benefits and Compensation
  • Energy and Climate Solutions
  • Executive Advisory Program
  • Finance and Structured Finance
  • Fund Formation
  • Greater China
  • Investment Adviser
  • Israel
  • Latin America
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Private Equity
  • Public Company Representation
  • Real Estate
  • Restructuring
  • Shareholder Engagement and Activism
  • Tax
  • U.S. Expansion

  • Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs)

  • Environmental, Social, and Governance

  • Decarbonization Strategies
  • Energy Regulation and Competition
  • Project Development and Transactions
  • Project Finance and Tax Equity
  • Sustainability and Decarbonization
  • Transportation Electrification

  • U.S. Expansion Library and Resources

  • Post-Grant Review
  • Trademark and Advertising

  • Arbitration
  • Board and Internal Investigations
  • Class Action Litigation
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Consumer Litigation
  • Corporate Governance Litigation
  • Employment Litigation
  • Government Investigations
  • Internet Strategy and Litigation
  • Patent Litigation
  • Securities Litigation
  • Supreme Court and Appellate Practice
  • Trade Secret Litigation
  • Trademark and Copyright Litigation
  • Trial
  • White Collar Crime

  • Advertising, Promotions, and Marketing
  • Antitrust and Competition
  • Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. (CFIUS)
  • Export Control and Sanctions
  • FCPA and Anti-Corruption
  • FDA Regulatory, Healthcare, and Consumer Products
  • Federal Trade Commission
  • Fintech and Financial Services
  • National Security
  • Payments
  • Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • Strategic Risk and Crisis Management

  • Antitrust and Intellectual Property
  • Antitrust Civil Enforcement
  • Antitrust Compliance and Business Strategy
  • Antitrust Criminal Enforcement
  • Antitrust Merger Clearance
  • Antitrust Litigation
  • European Competition Law
  • Third-Party Merger and Non-Merger Antitrust Representation

  • Anti-Money Laundering
  • Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence (FOCI)
  • Team Telecom

  • Animal Health
  • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
  • Aviation
  • Biotech
  • Blockchain and Cryptocurrency
  • Clean Energy
  • Climate and Clean Technologies
  • Communications and Networking
  • Consumer Products and Services
  • Data Storage and Cloud
  • Digital Health
  • Digital Media and Entertainment
  • Electronic Gaming
  • FoodTech and AgTech
  • Fintech and Financial Services
  • Global Generics
  • Internet
  • Life Sciences
  • Medical Devices
  • Mobile Devices
  • Mobility
  • NewSpace
  • Semiconductors
  • Software

  • Offices
  • Events
  • Pro Bono
  • Community
  • Our Diversity
  • Our Values
  • Board of Directors
  • Management Team

  • Austin
  • Beijing
  • Boston
  • Boulder
  • Brussels
  • Century City
  • Hong Kong
  • London
  • Los Angeles
  • New York
  • Palo Alto
  • Salt Lake City
  • San Diego
  • San Francisco
  • Seattle
  • Shanghai
  • SOMA
  • Washington, D.C.
  • Wilmington, DE

  • Law Students + Recent Graduates
  • Experienced Attorneys
  • Patent Agents
  • Professional Staff
  • Alternative Legal Careers
  • Contact Recruiting
Daniyal M. Iqbal
Associate
Litigation
Wilmington, DE
diqbal@wsgr.com

D302-304-7632

Download vCard
Open PDF

Daniyal Iqbal is an associate in the Wilmington office of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, where his practice focuses on corporate governance litigation and counseling. He has represented companies and their directors and officers in a wide range of complex stockholder and M&A litigation in the Delaware courts, including several high-stakes busted deal cases and cases involving novel issues of Delaware corporate law. Daniyal also specializes in advising companies on shareholder activism and corporate governance matters, and regularly advises public company boards in their defense against proxy contests.

Prior to joining the firm, Daniyal was an associate in the Wilmington office of Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, where he served as lead and local counsel to clients in corporate and commercial litigation in the Delaware Court of Chancery. During law school, he served as a judicial extern to the Honorable Juan Torruella of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.

Experience

Daniyal Iqbal is an associate in the Wilmington office of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, where his practice focuses on corporate governance litigation and counseling. He has represented companies and their directors and officers in a wide range of complex stockholder and M&A litigation in the Delaware courts, including several high-stakes busted deal cases and cases involving novel issues of Delaware corporate law. Daniyal also specializes in advising companies on shareholder activism and corporate governance matters, and regularly advises public company boards in their defense against proxy contests.

Prior to joining the firm, Daniyal was an associate in the Wilmington office of Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, where he served as lead and local counsel to clients in corporate and commercial litigation in the Delaware Court of Chancery. During law school, he served as a judicial extern to the Honorable Juan Torruella of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.

Education
  • J.D., Boston University School of Law, 2015Note Development Editor, Boston University Law Review; Jack T. Litman Fellow, Harvard Defenders Clinic, Harvard Law School
  • B.A., Philosophy, Fordham University, 2012Minor in Biological Sciences
Admissions
  • State Bar of Delaware
  • U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
Credentials
Education
  • J.D., Boston University School of Law, 2015Note Development Editor, Boston University Law Review; Jack T. Litman Fellow, Harvard Defenders Clinic, Harvard Law School
  • B.A., Philosophy, Fordham University, 2012Minor in Biological Sciences
Admissions
  • State Bar of Delaware
  • U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware

Select Governance and M&A Litigation Matters

  • Twitter v. Musk (Del. Ch.) – Represented Twitter in high-profile expedited litigation to successfully enforce Elon Musk’s acquisition of Twitter
  • In re Fox/Snap Section 242 Litigation (Del. Ch.) – Representing Fox in novel litigation concerning class voting rights in multi-class corporations under Delaware law; successfully obtained summary judgment, pending appeal
  • Forescout Technologies, Inc. v. Ferrari Group Holdings (Del. Ch.) – Represented Forescout in expedited busted deal litigation to enforce merger agreement with Advent International; obtained favorable settlement for client and closing of transaction
  • Ligos v. Isramco, Inc. (Del. Ch.) – Represented Special Committee of Isramco in litigation challenging controlling stockholder buyout; successfully obtained dismissal of all claims against the Special Committee
  • Riskin v. Burns (Del. Ch.) – Represented UPMC and its affiliates and officers in litigation challenging preferred stock issuances to UPMC; successfully obtained dismissal of various direct and derivative claims
  • In re TrueCar, Inc. Stockholder Derivative Litigation (Del. Ch.) – Represented TrueCar and members of its board of directors in multi-district litigation challenging secondary offering following earnings loss; successfully obtained dismissal of derivative suits
  • Neurvana Medical, LLC v. Balt USA, LLC (Del. Ch.) – Represented Balt USA and its affiliates in action asserting post-closing claims in connection with Balt’s purchase of assets from Neurvana; successfully obtained dismissal of all claims
  • Morrison v. Berry (Del. Ch.) – Represented officer of The Fresh Market, Inc. in post-closing fiduciary duty lawsuit; successfully obtained dismissal of duty of loyalty claims and settlement of remaining duty of care claims
  • Oxbow Carbon & Mineral Holdings, Inc. v. Crestview-Oxbow Acquisition, LLC (Del Ch.) – Represented controller in litigation with minority investors seeking to force a sale of Oxbow Carbon, resulting in a successful appeal to the Delaware Supreme Court
  • Represented Momentive Global, Inc. in multi-district stockholder litigation challenging acquisition of Momentive by Zendesk
  • Represented Zynga in multi-district stockholder litigation challenging acquisition of Zynga by Take-Two
  • Represented technology company in high-stakes arbitration concerning claims related to a joint venture

Select Shareholder Activism and Corporate Governance Matters

  • Advised Cutera, Inc. in its defense against proxy contest by dissident director
  • Advised VirnetX Holding Co. in its defense against proxy contest by Bradley Radoff and affiliates
  • Advised Twitter, Inc. in connection with sale to Elon Musk
  • Advised Athira Pharma, Inc. in its defense against proxy contest by Richard Kayne and affiliates
  • Advised Lifeway Foods, Inc. in its defense against proxy contest by dissident directors
  • Advised group of stockholders in connection with their activist campaign at Pasithea Therapeutics Corp.
  • Advised Eriksen Capital Management in connection with its activist campaign at Nocopi Technologies, Inc.
Matters

Select Governance and M&A Litigation Matters

  • Twitter v. Musk (Del. Ch.) – Represented Twitter in high-profile expedited litigation to successfully enforce Elon Musk’s acquisition of Twitter
  • In re Fox/Snap Section 242 Litigation (Del. Ch.) – Representing Fox in novel litigation concerning class voting rights in multi-class corporations under Delaware law; successfully obtained summary judgment, pending appeal
  • Forescout Technologies, Inc. v. Ferrari Group Holdings (Del. Ch.) – Represented Forescout in expedited busted deal litigation to enforce merger agreement with Advent International; obtained favorable settlement for client and closing of transaction
  • Ligos v. Isramco, Inc. (Del. Ch.) – Represented Special Committee of Isramco in litigation challenging controlling stockholder buyout; successfully obtained dismissal of all claims against the Special Committee
  • Riskin v. Burns (Del. Ch.) – Represented UPMC and its affiliates and officers in litigation challenging preferred stock issuances to UPMC; successfully obtained dismissal of various direct and derivative claims
  • In re TrueCar, Inc. Stockholder Derivative Litigation (Del. Ch.) – Represented TrueCar and members of its board of directors in multi-district litigation challenging secondary offering following earnings loss; successfully obtained dismissal of derivative suits
  • Neurvana Medical, LLC v. Balt USA, LLC (Del. Ch.) – Represented Balt USA and its affiliates in action asserting post-closing claims in connection with Balt’s purchase of assets from Neurvana; successfully obtained dismissal of all claims
  • Morrison v. Berry (Del. Ch.) – Represented officer of The Fresh Market, Inc. in post-closing fiduciary duty lawsuit; successfully obtained dismissal of duty of loyalty claims and settlement of remaining duty of care claims
  • Oxbow Carbon & Mineral Holdings, Inc. v. Crestview-Oxbow Acquisition, LLC (Del Ch.) – Represented controller in litigation with minority investors seeking to force a sale of Oxbow Carbon, resulting in a successful appeal to the Delaware Supreme Court
  • Represented Momentive Global, Inc. in multi-district stockholder litigation challenging acquisition of Momentive by Zendesk
  • Represented Zynga in multi-district stockholder litigation challenging acquisition of Zynga by Take-Two
  • Represented technology company in high-stakes arbitration concerning claims related to a joint venture

Select Shareholder Activism and Corporate Governance Matters

  • Advised Cutera, Inc. in its defense against proxy contest by dissident director
  • Advised VirnetX Holding Co. in its defense against proxy contest by Bradley Radoff and affiliates
  • Advised Twitter, Inc. in connection with sale to Elon Musk
  • Advised Athira Pharma, Inc. in its defense against proxy contest by Richard Kayne and affiliates
  • Advised Lifeway Foods, Inc. in its defense against proxy contest by dissident directors
  • Advised group of stockholders in connection with their activist campaign at Pasithea Therapeutics Corp.
  • Advised Eriksen Capital Management in connection with its activist campaign at Nocopi Technologies, Inc.

Select Publications

  • Co-author, "Lessons from the 2023 Proxy Season: Advance Notice Bylaws and Officer Exculpation," Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, September 5, 2023

  • Co-author, "Are Directors Liable if Their Company Violates the Law? The Practical Implications of 'Kandell,'" Delaware Business Court Insider, December 6, 2017
Insights

Select Publications

  • Co-author, "Lessons from the 2023 Proxy Season: Advance Notice Bylaws and Officer Exculpation," Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, September 5, 2023

  • Co-author, "Are Directors Liable if Their Company Violates the Law? The Practical Implications of 'Kandell,'" Delaware Business Court Insider, December 6, 2017
Focus Areas
  • Corporate Governance
  • Litigation
  • Securities Litigation
  • Shareholder Engagement and Activism
Recent Insights
Alerts
Lessons from the 2023 Proxy Season: Advance Notice Bylaws and Officer Exculpation
With the 2023 proxy season now over for most companies, we took a fresh look at recent bylaw and charter amendments at the Silicon Valley 150 (the SV150) to better understand how companies are addressing i) new Rule 14a-19, which mandates the use of a universal proxy card in contested elections; and ii) the recent amendment to Section 102(b)(7) of the Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL) to permit the adoption of officer exculpation charter provisions.
Learn More
Alerts
Delaware Court of Chancery Issues Decision on Disney Board’s Obligations in the DeSantis Dispute
On June 27, 2023, Vice Chancellor Lori Will of the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a much-anticipated decision addressing the obligations of the board of directors of The Walt Disney Company (Disney) in overseeing Disney’s response to Governor Ron DeSantis and the “Don’t Say Gay” bill, or HB 1557. In particular, the court rejected a books and records demand by a Disney stockholder seeking to investigate wrongdoing on the basis that the Disney board had breached its fiduciary duties by placing its own personal beliefs ahead of the interests of the corporation and its stockholders and taking positions that impaired the company’s value. The litigation reflects the pressures increasingly confronting corporations, and the landmark decision provides valuable guidance to boards in navigating environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues and controversies.
Learn More
View All
  • people
  • insights
  • about us
  • careers
  • Binder
  • Alumni
  • Mailing List Signup
  • Employee Login
  • Client FTP Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Accessibility
WSGR logo
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Instagram
Youtube
Copyright © 2023 Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati. All Rights Reserved.