WSGR logoWSGR logo
WSGR logo
  • Experience
  • People
  • Insights
  • About Us
  • Careers

  • Practice Areas
  • Industries

  • Corporate
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Patents and Innovations
  • Regulatory
  • Technology Transactions

  • Capital Markets
  • Corporate Governance
  • Corporate Life Sciences
  • Derivatives
  • Emerging Companies and Venture Capital
  • Employee Benefits and Compensation
  • Energy and Climate Solutions
  • Executive Advisory Program
  • Finance and Structured Finance
  • Fund Formation
  • Greater China
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Private Equity
  • Public Company Representation
  • Real Estate
  • Restructuring
  • Shareholder Engagement and Activism
  • Tax
  • U.S. Expansion
  • Wealthtech

  • Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs)

  • Environmental, Social, and Governance

  • AI and Data Center Infrastructure
  • Energy Regulation and Competition
  • Project Development and M&A
  • Project Finance and Tax Credit Transactions
  • Sustainability and Decarbonization
  • Transportation Electrification

  • U.S. Expansion Library and Resources

  • Post-Grant Review
  • Trademark and Advertising

  • Antitrust Litigation
  • Arbitration
  • Board and Internal Investigations
  • Class Action Litigation
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Consumer Litigation
  • Corporate Governance Litigation
  • Employment Litigation
  • Executive Branch Updates
  • Government Investigations
  • Internet Strategy and Litigation
  • Patent Litigation
  • Securities Litigation
  • State Attorneys General
  • Supreme Court and Appellate Practice
  • Trade Secret Litigation
  • Trademark and Copyright Litigation
  • Trial
  • White Collar Crime

  • Advertising, Promotions, and Marketing
  • Antitrust and Competition
  • Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. (CFIUS)
  • Communications
  • Data, Privacy, and Cybersecurity
  • Export Control and Sanctions
  • FCPA and Anti-Corruption
  • FDA Regulatory, Healthcare, and Consumer Products
  • Federal Trade Commission
  • Fintech and Financial Services
  • Government Contracts
  • National Security and Trade
  • Payments
  • State Attorneys General
  • Strategic Risk and Crisis Management
  • Tariffs, Customs, and Import Compliance

  • Antitrust and Intellectual Property
  • Antitrust Civil Enforcement
  • Antitrust Compliance and Business Strategy
  • Antitrust Criminal Enforcement
  • Antitrust Litigation
  • Antitrust Merger Clearance
  • European Competition Law
  • Third-Party Merger and Non-Merger Antitrust Representation

  • Anti-Money Laundering
  • Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence (FOCI)
  • Team Telecom

  • AI in Healthcare
  • Animal Health
  • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
  • Aviation
  • Biotech
  • Blockchain and Cryptocurrency
  • Clean Energy
  • Climate and Clean Technologies
  • Communications and Networking
  • Consumer Products and Services
  • Data Storage and Cloud
  • Defense Tech
  • Diagnostics, Life Science Tools, and Deep Tech
  • Digital Health
  • Digital Media and Entertainment
  • Electronic Gaming
  • Fintech and Financial Services
  • FoodTech and AgTech
  • Global Generics
  • Internet
  • Life Sciences
  • Medical Devices
  • Mobile Devices
  • Mobility
  • NewSpace
  • Quantum Computing
  • Semiconductors
  • Software

  • Offices
  • Country Desks
  • Events
  • Community
  • Our Diversity
  • Sustainability
  • Our Values
  • Board of Directors
  • Management Team

  • Austin
  • Boston
  • Boulder
  • Brussels
  • Century City
  • Hong Kong
  • London
  • Los Angeles
  • New York
  • Palo Alto
  • Salt Lake City
  • San Diego
  • San Francisco
  • Seattle
  • Shanghai
  • Washington, D.C.
  • Wilmington, DE

  • Law Students
  • Judicial Clerks
  • Experienced Attorneys
  • Patent Agents
  • Business Professionals
  • Alternative Legal Careers
  • Contact Recruiting
Daniyal M. Iqbal
Partner
Litigation
Wilmington, DE
diqbal@wsgr.com

D302-304-7632

Download vCard
Open PDF

Daniyal Iqbal is a partner in the Wilmington office of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, where his practice focuses on corporate governance litigation and counseling. He has represented companies and their directors and officers in a wide range of complex stockholder and M&A litigation in the Delaware courts, including several high-stakes busted deal and corporate control disputes and cases involving novel issues of Delaware corporate law. In addition, Daniyal specializes in advising companies on shareholder activism and corporate governance matters, and regularly advises public company boards in their defense against proxy contests. He also frequently advises on special litigation committee and demand review committee matters.

Prior to joining the firm, Daniyal was an associate in the Wilmington office of Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, where he served as lead and local counsel to clients in corporate and commercial litigation in the Delaware Court of Chancery. During law school, he served as a judicial extern to the Honorable Juan Torruella of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.

Experience

Daniyal Iqbal is a partner in the Wilmington office of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, where his practice focuses on corporate governance litigation and counseling. He has represented companies and their directors and officers in a wide range of complex stockholder and M&A litigation in the Delaware courts, including several high-stakes busted deal and corporate control disputes and cases involving novel issues of Delaware corporate law. In addition, Daniyal specializes in advising companies on shareholder activism and corporate governance matters, and regularly advises public company boards in their defense against proxy contests. He also frequently advises on special litigation committee and demand review committee matters.

Prior to joining the firm, Daniyal was an associate in the Wilmington office of Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, where he served as lead and local counsel to clients in corporate and commercial litigation in the Delaware Court of Chancery. During law school, he served as a judicial extern to the Honorable Juan Torruella of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.

Education
  • J.D., Boston University School of Law, 2015Note Development Editor, Boston University Law Review; Jack T. Litman Fellow, Harvard Defenders Clinic, Harvard Law School
  • B.A., Fordham University, 2012
Admissions
  • State Bar of Delaware
  • U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
Credentials
Education
  • J.D., Boston University School of Law, 2015Note Development Editor, Boston University Law Review; Jack T. Litman Fellow, Harvard Defenders Clinic, Harvard Law School
  • B.A., Fordham University, 2012
Admissions
  • State Bar of Delaware
  • U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware

Select Governance and M&A Litigation Matters

  • Starboard Value, LP v. Autodesk, Inc. (Del. Ch.) – Represented Autodesk and its board in expedited litigation filed by activist seeking to reopen director nomination window; successfully opposed motion to expedite and secured dismissal of case
  • In re Fox/Snap Section 242 Litigation (Del. Ch.) – Represented Fox in novel litigation concerning class voting rights in multi-class corporations under Delaware law; successfully obtained summary judgment and affirmance on appeal
  • Twitter v. Musk (Del. Ch.) – Represented Twitter in expedited litigation to successfully enforce Elon Musk’s acquisition of Twitter
  • Forescout Technologies, Inc. v. Ferrari Group Holdings (Del. Ch.) – Represented Forescout in expedited busted deal litigation to enforce merger agreement with Advent International; obtained favorable settlement for client and closing of transaction
  • Ligos v. Isramco, Inc. (Del. Ch.) – Represented Special Committee of Isramco in litigation challenging controlling stockholder buyout; successfully obtained dismissal of all claims against the Special Committee
  • Riskin v. Burns (Del. Ch.) – Represented UPMC and its affiliates and officers in litigation challenging preferred stock issuances to UPMC; successfully obtained dismissal of various direct and derivative claims
  • In re TrueCar, Inc. Stockholder Derivative Litigation (Del. Ch.) – Represented TrueCar and its board in multi-district litigation challenging secondary offering following earnings loss; successfully obtained dismissal of derivative suits
  • Neurvana Medical, LLC v. Balt USA, LLC (Del. Ch.) – Represented Balt USA and its affiliates in action asserting post-closing claims in connection with Balt’s purchase of assets from Neurvana; successfully obtained dismissal of all claims
  • Morrison v. Berry (Del. Ch.) – Represented officer of The Fresh Market, Inc. in post-closing fiduciary duty lawsuit; successfully obtained dismissal of duty of loyalty claims and settlement of remaining duty of care claims
  • Oxbow Carbon & Mineral Holdings, Inc. v. Crestview-Oxbow Acquisition, LLC (Del Ch.) – Represented controller in litigation with minority investors seeking to force a sale of Oxbow Carbon, resulting in a successful appeal to the Delaware Supreme Court
  • Represented Momentive Global, Inc. in multi-district stockholder litigation challenging acquisition of Momentive by Zendesk
  • Represented Zynga in multi-district stockholder litigation challenging acquisition of Zynga by Take-Two
  • Represented technology company in high-stakes arbitration concerning claims related to a joint venture

Select Shareholder Activism and Corporate Governance Matters

  • Advised Cutera, Inc. in its defense against proxy contest by dissident director
  • Advised VirnetX Holding Co. in its defense against proxy contest by Bradley Radoff and affiliates
  • Advised Twitter, Inc. in connection with sale to Elon Musk
  • Advised Athira Pharma, Inc. in its defense against proxy contest by Richard Kayne and affiliates
  • Advised Lifeway Foods, Inc. in its defense against proxy contest by dissident directors
  • Advised group of stockholders in connection with their activist campaign at Pasithea Therapeutics Corp.
  • Advised Eriksen Capital Management in connection with its activist campaign at Nocopi Technologies, Inc.

Select Special Litigation Committee Matters

  • Representing special litigation committee of Coinbase Global, Inc. in investigation of stockholder derivative claims
  • Representing special litigation committee of Novavax, Inc. in investigation of stockholder derivative claims
  • Represented special litigation committee of Insys Therapeutics, Inc. in investigation of stockholder derivative claims

 

Matters

Select Governance and M&A Litigation Matters

  • Starboard Value, LP v. Autodesk, Inc. (Del. Ch.) – Represented Autodesk and its board in expedited litigation filed by activist seeking to reopen director nomination window; successfully opposed motion to expedite and secured dismissal of case
  • In re Fox/Snap Section 242 Litigation (Del. Ch.) – Represented Fox in novel litigation concerning class voting rights in multi-class corporations under Delaware law; successfully obtained summary judgment and affirmance on appeal
  • Twitter v. Musk (Del. Ch.) – Represented Twitter in expedited litigation to successfully enforce Elon Musk’s acquisition of Twitter
  • Forescout Technologies, Inc. v. Ferrari Group Holdings (Del. Ch.) – Represented Forescout in expedited busted deal litigation to enforce merger agreement with Advent International; obtained favorable settlement for client and closing of transaction
  • Ligos v. Isramco, Inc. (Del. Ch.) – Represented Special Committee of Isramco in litigation challenging controlling stockholder buyout; successfully obtained dismissal of all claims against the Special Committee
  • Riskin v. Burns (Del. Ch.) – Represented UPMC and its affiliates and officers in litigation challenging preferred stock issuances to UPMC; successfully obtained dismissal of various direct and derivative claims
  • In re TrueCar, Inc. Stockholder Derivative Litigation (Del. Ch.) – Represented TrueCar and its board in multi-district litigation challenging secondary offering following earnings loss; successfully obtained dismissal of derivative suits
  • Neurvana Medical, LLC v. Balt USA, LLC (Del. Ch.) – Represented Balt USA and its affiliates in action asserting post-closing claims in connection with Balt’s purchase of assets from Neurvana; successfully obtained dismissal of all claims
  • Morrison v. Berry (Del. Ch.) – Represented officer of The Fresh Market, Inc. in post-closing fiduciary duty lawsuit; successfully obtained dismissal of duty of loyalty claims and settlement of remaining duty of care claims
  • Oxbow Carbon & Mineral Holdings, Inc. v. Crestview-Oxbow Acquisition, LLC (Del Ch.) – Represented controller in litigation with minority investors seeking to force a sale of Oxbow Carbon, resulting in a successful appeal to the Delaware Supreme Court
  • Represented Momentive Global, Inc. in multi-district stockholder litigation challenging acquisition of Momentive by Zendesk
  • Represented Zynga in multi-district stockholder litigation challenging acquisition of Zynga by Take-Two
  • Represented technology company in high-stakes arbitration concerning claims related to a joint venture

Select Shareholder Activism and Corporate Governance Matters

  • Advised Cutera, Inc. in its defense against proxy contest by dissident director
  • Advised VirnetX Holding Co. in its defense against proxy contest by Bradley Radoff and affiliates
  • Advised Twitter, Inc. in connection with sale to Elon Musk
  • Advised Athira Pharma, Inc. in its defense against proxy contest by Richard Kayne and affiliates
  • Advised Lifeway Foods, Inc. in its defense against proxy contest by dissident directors
  • Advised group of stockholders in connection with their activist campaign at Pasithea Therapeutics Corp.
  • Advised Eriksen Capital Management in connection with its activist campaign at Nocopi Technologies, Inc.

Select Special Litigation Committee Matters

  • Representing special litigation committee of Coinbase Global, Inc. in investigation of stockholder derivative claims
  • Representing special litigation committee of Novavax, Inc. in investigation of stockholder derivative claims
  • Represented special litigation committee of Insys Therapeutics, Inc. in investigation of stockholder derivative claims

 

Select Publications

  • Co-author, “Approaching Shareholder Engagement in 2024,” Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, February 16, 2024

  • Co-author, "Lessons from the 2023 Proxy Season: Advance Notice Bylaws and Officer Exculpation," Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, September 5, 2023

  • Co-author, "Are Directors Liable if Their Company Violates the Law? The Practical Implications of 'Kandell,'" Delaware Business Court Insider, December 6, 2017
Insights

Select Publications

  • Co-author, “Approaching Shareholder Engagement in 2024,” Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, February 16, 2024

  • Co-author, "Lessons from the 2023 Proxy Season: Advance Notice Bylaws and Officer Exculpation," Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, September 5, 2023

  • Co-author, "Are Directors Liable if Their Company Violates the Law? The Practical Implications of 'Kandell,'" Delaware Business Court Insider, December 6, 2017
Focus Areas
  • Corporate Governance
  • Litigation
  • Securities Litigation
  • Shareholder Engagement and Activism
Recent Insights
Alerts
Delaware Court of Chancery Interprets New Section 144 and Applies Heightened Presumption of Director Independence
On June 15, 2026, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued an Opinion interpreting Section 144 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the DGCL), the landmark statutory measure adopted last year to provide safe harbors for certain conflicted transactions and address director independence, among other reforms.1 The Opinion arose in a common context in Delaware stockholder litigation: claims over director and management compensation. In the decision, Vice Chancellor Lori W. Will applied, for the first time, the statute’s heightened presumption of independence for directors of public companies determined by the board to be independent under the relevant NYSE or Nasdaq listing standards to dismiss derivative claims on demand futility grounds.
Learn More
Client Highlights
Firm Advises BlackLine on Agreement with Engaged Capital
On March 10, 2026, BlackLine announced that it entered into a cooperation agreement with Engaged Capital. Under this agreement, BlackLine appointed Storm Duncan and Megan Prichard to its board of directors, and Engaged Capital agreed to various restrictions on its activities at BlackLine. Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati advised BlackLine on the cooperation agreement.
Learn More
View All
Recent Events
Affiliated Programs
2026 BYU Winter Deals Conference
Wilson Sonsini is proud to sponsor BYU Law School’s Winter Deals Conference. The conference brings together leading scholars and practitioners to discuss the modern global economy’s most pressing legal issues from mergers and acquisitions to venture capital to corporate governance, and more. Litigation partner Dan Iqbal will serve as a panelist on the Keynote Panel with Justice Karen Valihura (Delaware Supreme Court) on Friday, February 6 at 6:10 p.m. For more details, please visit the event website.
Learn More
  • people
  • insights
  • about us
  • careers
  • Binder
  • Alumni
  • Mailing List Signup
  • Client FTP Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Accessibility
WSGR logo
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Instagram
Youtube
Copyright © 2026 Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati. All Rights Reserved.